
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why is the SEC contesting the lawsuit filed in Louisiana and not the one in Texas?
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:12 pm
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:12 pm
Thanks!
This post was edited on 8/30/26 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:13 pm to LSU4Life2021
They arent contesting in the traditional since.
They have to go defend their position because they have been ordered to show cause in Louisiana.
They have to go defend their position because they have been ordered to show cause in Louisiana.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 12:46 pm to Ebridg3
Not really. If the SEC wanted to concede or not contest they could do so in multiple ways, i.e. not show up, consent to the relief sought. The TRO was issued without a hearing. Thursday will be a contested hearing on the merits. I think the SEC is unlikely to prevail given the previous decisions of other courts.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 1:20 pm to LSU4Life2021
NVM that was some Kentucky case
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 8/31/26 at 1:53 pm to LSU4Life2021
quote:
Why is the SEC contesting the lawsuit filed in Louisiana and not the one in Texas?
The press release I saw said they would.
My question is why are these lawsuits only involving the SEC and not the Big10 who started this conference line in the sand thing.
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:01 pm to Brownlaw
quote:With a contempt of court hearing in the offing, not showing up would be an odd choice.
If the SEC wanted to concede or not contest they could do so in multiple ways, i.e. not show up, consent to the relief sought.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:07 pm to NC_Tigah
Has a rule for contempt been filed? I have not heard anything about that. In what manner has the SEC violated a court order? In fact, the most recent news is that the SEC will abide by any court orders.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:20 pm to Brownlaw
They are used to LSU folding like a bitch. See the Will Wade firing fiasco. Now with the new leadership and Governor involvement LSU is fighting back. They don’t like that. Let them try to make an example.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:49 pm to Brownlaw
quote:
Has a rule for contempt been filed? I have not heard anything about that. In what manner has the SEC violated a court order? In fact, the most recent news is that the SEC will abide by any court orders.
The judge issued a show cause because they created their rule after the ruling against the NCAA and it directly conflicts with the same relief the players were given.
I.e. it has the same effect... and that was the intended impact of the rule.. and like I said, it was made in response to the TRO.
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 8/31/26 at 3:58 pm to Ebridg3
That’s not how civil procedure works.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 6:00 pm to Brownlaw
quote:
I have not heard anything about that. In what manner has the SEC violated a court order?
quote:
The judge also signed a show-cause order that requires the SEC and NCAA to explain during Thursday's hearing why the new penalties associated with their pro athlete rules, which plaintiffs' attorneys described as "draconian," do not put them in contempt of court and in violation of the judge's previous ruling in the case.
LINK
quote:Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 6:02 pm to Brownlaw
The SEC will appeal in that case. I don't believe the SEC will let this go. They wouldn't hire outside counsel from NOLA if the SEC were going to cede this case.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 6:11 pm to LVag1997
quote:They will appeal for a stay of the injunction (assuming a PI is granted). They will, with virtual certainty, lose that appeal.
The SEC will appeal in that case.

Popular
Back to top
4











