- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who filed the motion to continue?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:52 pm to Geaux Tahel
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:52 pm to Geaux Tahel
Continue the present suit with SEC as plaintiff? No immediate reason comes to mind apart from knowing they have a winning case and may wish to play it out to receive restitution from the SEC and maybe wring some changes from that corrupt group? In any case, I do not see the SEC dropping things at this point. Too much sunken cost. I agree that it is moot but the SEC now has its dicks out. Would that LSU cuts them off.

Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:58 pm to Geaux Tahel
quote:When you're opposing a TRO, a continuance is a win.
Why would LSU agree to continue? Its obvious the SECs legal representation is a clownshow, along with Sankey... so this allows the SEC to seek consult in an attempt to navigate their heads out of their collective assholes.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:12 pm to Salviati
quote:
When you're opposing a TRO, a continuance is a win
Gotcha
Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:16 pm to Obi Wan Ryobi
quote:The court.
Who filed the motion to continue?
So, depending on SEC action, Sankey and the SEC are exposed. Possibly along with any individual university assholes pursuing action against LSU.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:26 pm to White Tiger
quote:
the SEC now has its dicks out. Would that LSU cuts them off.
They should know the further out it gets, the more blood you lose when it's cut off.
Popular
Back to top


1






