Started By
Message

re: Who filed the motion to continue?

Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:52 pm to
Posted by White Tiger
Dallas
Member since Jul 2007
15928 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:52 pm to
Continue the present suit with SEC as plaintiff? No immediate reason comes to mind apart from knowing they have a winning case and may wish to play it out to receive restitution from the SEC and maybe wring some changes from that corrupt group? In any case, I do not see the SEC dropping things at this point. Too much sunken cost. I agree that it is moot but the SEC now has its dicks out. Would that LSU cuts them off.

Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
8097 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

Why would LSU agree to continue? Its obvious the SECs legal representation is a clownshow, along with Sankey... so this allows the SEC to seek consult in an attempt to navigate their heads out of their collective assholes.
When you're opposing a TRO, a continuance is a win.
Posted by Geaux Tahel
Member since Feb 2006
7083 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

When you're opposing a TRO, a continuance is a win


Gotcha
Posted by NC_Tigah
Ray Bans for Max Polarization
Member since Sep 2003
141006 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Who filed the motion to continue?
The court.

So, depending on SEC action, Sankey and the SEC are exposed. Possibly along with any individual university assholes pursuing action against LSU.
Posted by EulerRules
Member since Dec 2019
2175 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

the SEC now has its dicks out. Would that LSU cuts them off.

They should know the further out it gets, the more blood you lose when it's cut off.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram