- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which QB should have been in there the last 30 seconds?
Posted on 10/4/10 at 1:36 pm to TigerWilson88
Posted on 10/4/10 at 1:36 pm to TigerWilson88
both of them? neither of them? RS?
Posted on 10/4/10 at 1:39 pm to LSU GrandDad
Enough of the RS shite. Its painfullyfrickingobvious they aren't going to use him as a QB. Why do you guys keep crying about it when its just not going to happen.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 1:47 pm to Putty
quote:
(a) Whichever one you trust the most not to dick up the clock management. The fact that the coaches either don't know this or trust the wrong guy is shameful.
(b) what Chicken said.
They should have made whatever decision they were gonna make (QB-wise) when the penalty was being called that gave us the first down at the 2.
There is no way I would throw it in the end zone right there (see first down attempt with the heavy pass rush and see previous throw into the end zone that was picked). You have a guy who was SEC offensive player of the week - RUN THE BALL and you're two yards away. Why risk a sack, intentional grounding or pick? JL did the smart thing and threw it away.
As for clock management - JJ is awful with that if he has to improvise. However, he's fine as long as you get the plays in to him. We barely ever have delay of game penalties with him...I'll give him that.
JL had no clue that the clock had hit zero on a 4th & 9 with the game on the line. And we followed up the penalty by having to waste one of our timeouts. That's awful game management from the QB and coaches. However, he followed that up with a beautiful pass conversion on 4th and long.
If we let games come down to the last seconds - we're basically F'd because nobody manages anything right in that situation. It's been proven.
I understand why they put JJ in after the incompletion because Tennessee had to worry about him taking the ball and it gave us more options running. Of course Tennessee knew we were gonna run after 1st down. So if you leave JL in there, it's even harder to get in running because they know to send the house at the RB in the backfield. With JJ, they had been burned before and had to key on him AND the RB. And we did eventually get in. But we barely got in...I think it would have been really hard to get in after the incompletion with JL in at QB and Tenn. knowing we were running. Then again, our coaches were so stupid that we might have passed again.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 1:48 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
Why do you guys keep crying about it when its just not going to happen.
Because this is the rant. That's what we do here besides correct each others grammar.
Also, just because it won't happen with miles as HC doesn't mean that it shouldn't. Plenty of other schools do this very well.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 3:07 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
Enough of the RS shite. Its painfullyfrickingobvious they aren't going to use him as a QB. Why do you guys keep crying about it when its just not going to happen.
worked for Lee...and look what we got!
Posted on 10/5/10 at 9:30 am to TigerWilson88
Nice sig Tigerfan 555555 but if you have to elaborate on the sig for it to make sense then it's really not a great sig. 
Posted on 10/5/10 at 9:36 am to just me
quote:
it was clear that Jefferson was throwing the ball better against Tennessee.
quote:
just me
You have been riding JJ so long that you said Jefferson instead of Lee
Posted on 10/5/10 at 9:37 am to Chicken
quote:
Lee took you down the field...why not just leave him in? you have no timeouts, so passing to the endzone is the safer option.
This is the only acceptable answer
Posted on 10/5/10 at 10:42 am to Powerman
quote:
This is the only acceptable answer
I'll elaborate even further. Lee is the only acceptable answer for the rest of the season!
Posted on 10/5/10 at 10:44 am to TigerWilson88
It does not matter. Les is winning with which ever QB is in the game. Les is on a roll. 
Posted on 10/5/10 at 10:44 am to Chicken
quote:
Lee took you down the field...why not just leave him in?
this and then run a HB dive.
Posted on 10/5/10 at 10:46 am to adammwilson
quote:
this and then run a HB dive.
Exactly, When we were on the 3, I had much more confidence with Ridley running the ball straight into the heart of their D then JJ running to the sidelines
Posted on 10/5/10 at 10:50 am to TigerWilson88
My only thought is realistically, from 2 yards out, any quarterback should be a running threat.
Posted on 10/5/10 at 10:51 am to TigerWilson88
I would have kept Lee in there, but I thought putting JJ in, due to the running threat, was reasonable. Of course, the failure to call 2 plays or manage the clock is inexcusable.
One thing that the QB change showed is that our playcaller (I assume Crowton) has a tendency to outsmart himself. You can sub personnel after the incompletion if you want but making wholesale changes after a failed running play, with the clock ticking, is crazy!
One thing that the QB change showed is that our playcaller (I assume Crowton) has a tendency to outsmart himself. You can sub personnel after the incompletion if you want but making wholesale changes after a failed running play, with the clock ticking, is crazy!
Popular
Back to top

1







