- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What's our record had we signed chad kelly?
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:44 pm to DarthLannister
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:44 pm to DarthLannister

Posted on 12/17/15 at 3:11 pm to DarthLannister
same , miles would not have played him.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 3:16 pm to geauxtigers456
quote:
You may be right, but why are we even talking about this, its a terrible question.
miles supporters typically ask questions like this to deflect as much negativity away from miles as possible
Posted on 12/17/15 at 3:23 pm to DarthLannister
quote:
What's our record had we signed chad kelly?
Our record would be, and will be, the same regardless of who we signed before or will sign in the future.
quote:
We for sure would have beaten ole miss. The QBs behind kelly are miserable....
bullshite. Freeze beat Miles in 2013 with half a team. We have had higher ranked recruiting classes four out of the last five years. Freeze is simply better than Miles and will perform better than Miles. One player switching rosters will not change that.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 3:32 pm to DarthLannister
I'm tired of of reading about "what ifs".
Posted on 12/17/15 at 3:34 pm to DarthLannister
quote:
Well we have gotten to that day. Look at their past two bowl games compared to ours
You do realize that LSU beat them two years ago and they had the same overall record this year. So that means with their best recruiting class ever from three years ago they still have not won anything and most of those guys are leaving after this year.
My point still remains LSU should not take a recruit for the sole purpose of well if we don't take him he is going to Ole Miss or any school for that matter. You take a recruit because you think he will help your team on and off the field.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 3:50 pm to TigerStripes30
9-2 because Ole Miss would not have had him
Really though I know what you are asking but truly you can't say. The dude is a gunslinger and he would not have been doing that here. So I will stick by the 9-2 because Ole Miss would not have had him and they don't have any other QB hence that is why they went after Kelly so hard! Ole Miss better pray that Kelly returns for his senior year because if not they will be handing it off to a true freshman in Patterson and that does not bold well I don't care how much so called talent Patterson has.
Name me one true freshman that started at QB in the SEC the last 10 years? Tebow?

Really though I know what you are asking but truly you can't say. The dude is a gunslinger and he would not have been doing that here. So I will stick by the 9-2 because Ole Miss would not have had him and they don't have any other QB hence that is why they went after Kelly so hard! Ole Miss better pray that Kelly returns for his senior year because if not they will be handing it off to a true freshman in Patterson and that does not bold well I don't care how much so called talent Patterson has.
Name me one true freshman that started at QB in the SEC the last 10 years? Tebow?
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 12/17/15 at 4:05 pm to Nissanmaxima
quote:
Name me one true freshman that started at QB in the SEC the last 10 years? Tebow?
Tebow didn't start his freshman year. Chris Leak was the starter. Tebow was there short yardage QB.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 4:22 pm to DarthLannister
After all the shite that dude did at Clemson, I'm happy we didn't sign him.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:19 pm to DarthLannister
What's our record in 2016 if we freed up a coaching vacancy for Shea Patterson? Some kids just aren't worth it.
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:31 pm to DarthLannister
We would be playing for a championship.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:39 pm to beauchristopher
Bs
Kelly is a player.
Best qb in the sec.
Dude is tough, fast enough and can make every throw.
For a guy that just came on the team sorta makes you wonder about this "learning the offense" limitation that certain LSU qbs under miles seems to have.
Kelly is a player.
Best qb in the sec.
Dude is tough, fast enough and can make every throw.
For a guy that just came on the team sorta makes you wonder about this "learning the offense" limitation that certain LSU qbs under miles seems to have.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:41 pm to DarthLannister
quote:
What's our record had we signed chad kelly?
Probably 8-3. He would not be nearly as good under Miles and Cam and likely would have regressed.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:42 pm to DarthLannister
quote:
Ole miss would not have beaten us so it's not dumb
It is entirely possible that Miles would have found a way to lose.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:43 pm to DarthLannister
Our defense gave up 20 points plus for EVERY game between Miss State and Aggies
So idk maybe 9-2 rn
So idk maybe 9-2 rn
Posted on 12/17/15 at 8:32 pm to DarthLannister
Not much different. It's a lot easier for Ole piss to keep Chad Kelly in line than it would be for LSU.
IMHO, Kelly will get into trouble there soon enough. At LSU, he would be kicked off the team.
IMHO, Kelly will get into trouble there soon enough. At LSU, he would be kicked off the team.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 8:54 pm to DarthLannister
The same. In this offense with this staff he would have been a shade better than Harris. The problem isn't the players here. It's the coaching and scheme.
Back to top
