Started By
Message

re: What's our record had we signed chad kelly?

Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:44 pm to
Posted by la_birdman
Northern GA via Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31564 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:44 pm to
Posted by TigerStripes30
Alexandria, LA
Member since Dec 2011
6397 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:46 pm to
National Title
Posted by Kingpenm3
Xanadu
Member since Aug 2011
9526 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:47 pm to
15-0
Posted by JTA1985
Member since Feb 2012
3456 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 3:11 pm to
same , miles would not have played him.
Posted by ODSanchez
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2015
210 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

You may be right, but why are we even talking about this, its a terrible question.


miles supporters typically ask questions like this to deflect as much negativity away from miles as possible
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

What's our record had we signed chad kelly?


Our record would be, and will be, the same regardless of who we signed before or will sign in the future.

quote:

We for sure would have beaten ole miss. The QBs behind kelly are miserable....


bullshite. Freeze beat Miles in 2013 with half a team. We have had higher ranked recruiting classes four out of the last five years. Freeze is simply better than Miles and will perform better than Miles. One player switching rosters will not change that.
Posted by Folsom
Folsom
Member since Mar 2006
3455 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 3:32 pm to
I'm tired of of reading about "what ifs".
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13734 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 3:34 pm to
quote:


Well we have gotten to that day. Look at their past two bowl games compared to ours


You do realize that LSU beat them two years ago and they had the same overall record this year. So that means with their best recruiting class ever from three years ago they still have not won anything and most of those guys are leaving after this year.

My point still remains LSU should not take a recruit for the sole purpose of well if we don't take him he is going to Ole Miss or any school for that matter. You take a recruit because you think he will help your team on and off the field.
Posted by Nissanmaxima
Member since Feb 2006
14928 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 3:50 pm to
9-2 because Ole Miss would not have had him


Really though I know what you are asking but truly you can't say. The dude is a gunslinger and he would not have been doing that here. So I will stick by the 9-2 because Ole Miss would not have had him and they don't have any other QB hence that is why they went after Kelly so hard! Ole Miss better pray that Kelly returns for his senior year because if not they will be handing it off to a true freshman in Patterson and that does not bold well I don't care how much so called talent Patterson has.

Name me one true freshman that started at QB in the SEC the last 10 years? Tebow?
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 3:55 pm
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13734 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

Name me one true freshman that started at QB in the SEC the last 10 years? Tebow?


Tebow didn't start his freshman year. Chris Leak was the starter. Tebow was there short yardage QB.
Posted by bluebarracuda
Member since Oct 2011
18860 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 4:22 pm to
After all the shite that dude did at Clemson, I'm happy we didn't sign him.
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12137 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:19 pm to
What's our record in 2016 if we freed up a coaching vacancy for Shea Patterson? Some kids just aren't worth it.
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 5:33 pm
Posted by uncledog1958
monroe
Member since Sep 2015
319 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:31 pm to
We would be playing for a championship.
Posted by Makinbacon
Member since Jul 2015
2791 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:39 pm to
Bs

Kelly is a player.
Best qb in the sec.

Dude is tough, fast enough and can make every throw.
For a guy that just came on the team sorta makes you wonder about this "learning the offense" limitation that certain LSU qbs under miles seems to have.
Posted by NoNameTiger
Mandeville, LA
Member since Nov 2015
2054 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

What's our record had we signed chad kelly?


Probably 8-3. He would not be nearly as good under Miles and Cam and likely would have regressed.
Posted by NoNameTiger
Mandeville, LA
Member since Nov 2015
2054 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

Ole miss would not have beaten us so it's not dumb


It is entirely possible that Miles would have found a way to lose.
Posted by UnAnon
Breaux Bridge
Member since Sep 2013
6570 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:43 pm to
Our defense gave up 20 points plus for EVERY game between Miss State and Aggies

So idk maybe 9-2 rn
Posted by LuzianaFootball
DC
Member since Dec 2008
8027 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 6:13 pm to
Super Bowl
Posted by Paluka
One State Over
Member since Dec 2010
10763 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 8:32 pm to
Not much different. It's a lot easier for Ole piss to keep Chad Kelly in line than it would be for LSU.

IMHO, Kelly will get into trouble there soon enough. At LSU, he would be kicked off the team.
Posted by baobabtiger
Member since May 2009
4863 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 8:54 pm to
The same. In this offense with this staff he would have been a shade better than Harris. The problem isn't the players here. It's the coaching and scheme.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram