Started By
Message

What's our record had we signed chad kelly?

Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:20 pm
Posted by DarthLannister
Member since Dec 2015
63 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:20 pm
We for sure would have beaten ole miss. The QBs behind kelly are miserable....

I'm saying 10-1 going to sugar bowl. What I hate about miles and Cameron is that they knew he'd go to ole miss if they didn't offer. Why not take him purely so ole miss doesn't get him?
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76335 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:21 pm to
I don't know
Posted by BRTiger2005
Member since May 2005
1270 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:21 pm to
It's the same. Our record would've been the same.

Dumb question.
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
65957 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:22 pm to
Not much different IMO
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83583 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:22 pm to
Posted by DarthLannister
Member since Dec 2015
63 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:23 pm to
Ole miss would not have beaten us so it's not dumb
Posted by geauxtigers456
Member since Jul 2015
2067 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:23 pm to
8-3
Posted by DarthLannister
Member since Dec 2015
63 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:25 pm to
If you think ole miss beats lsu without Kelly then you're an idiot or don't understand football at all
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:25 pm to
I'm saying 10-1 going to sugar bowl. What I hate about miles and Cameron is that they knew he'd go to ole miss if they didn't offer. Why not take him purely so ole miss doesn't get him?

aka the Bear Bryant move.
Posted by geauxtigers456
Member since Jul 2015
2067 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:27 pm to
Oh really? I forgot Kelly played D-Line when you they held on the goal line and we turned the ball over on downs in the 4th. You may be right, but why are we even talking about this, its a terrible question.
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 2:29 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66562 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:27 pm to
We would have beat ole miss if Kelly isn't there. The backup is garbage.
Posted by DarthLannister
Member since Dec 2015
63 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:28 pm to
How would ole miss have scored without Kelly? We stack the box against those other clown qbs
Posted by DarthLannister
Member since Dec 2015
63 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

We would have beat ole miss if Kelly isn't there. The backup is garbage.


This
Posted by Roll on Tigers
Across the Border
Member since Jul 2013
4016 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:30 pm to
Get outta here with this stupid bullshite
Posted by geauxtigers456
Member since Jul 2015
2067 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:30 pm to
You may be right, but who cares its their starting QB. Has it gotten to the point where we have to rely on opposing teams players not be able to play for us to be able to win?
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13734 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

I'm saying 10-1 going to sugar bowl. What I hate about miles and Cameron is that they knew he'd go to ole miss if they didn't offer. Why not take him purely so ole miss doesn't get him?

aka the Bear Bryant move


Bear Bryant also could put people on swimming scholarships and have them play football. He was a character risk that LSU felt was not worth it. The day LSU signs a kid because he might go to Ole Miss will be a sad day.
Posted by DarthLannister
Member since Dec 2015
63 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:39 pm to
Well we have gotten to that day. Look at their past two bowl games compared to ours
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
11295 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

I'm saying 10-1 going to sugar bowl. What I hate about miles and Cameron is that they knew he'd go to ole miss if they didn't offer. Why not take him purely so ole miss doesn't get him?

aka the Bear Bryant move.


Absolutely. At the least it weakens Ole Miss.

I think coaches today are more concerned with scaring away existing players with competition. Sad really.
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:40 pm to
He'd probably struggle and folks will say he doesn't fit the offense.

Posted by Jeaux Cool
Frisco via NELA
Member since Sep 2015
1746 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

What's our record had we signed chad kelly?

Irrelevant. Dumb thread
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram