- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What will be your reaction if RJ Jackson
Posted on 7/15/09 at 11:32 am to Cash
Posted on 7/15/09 at 11:32 am to Cash
quote:
And the coaches never make a mistake. Clearly Malveto was the best hire Miles could have made. Clearly we should have just keep running JV up the middle against Auburn in 2006. Clearly the best move was to keep Chales Scott on the bench in the second half against Kentucky in 2007. Fear da HAT!!!
0
Posted on 7/15/09 at 11:34 am to BT
quote:
All Im saying is that RJ starts over a RR there's probably a good reason why.
seniority > talent?
Posted on 7/15/09 at 11:37 am to ForeLSU
I'm not saying the hands are there, but RJ Jackson always reminded me a little of Josh Reed with the size and position change. I think we just have better WR than when Josh was here so the QB's don't have to throw to one guy like Rohan did. I wonder if Reed would have gotten as much PT as a sophmore/freshman with LaFell, Tolliver and Early on the team???
Before everyone goes crazy, I know Reed >>> RJ.
Before everyone goes crazy, I know Reed >>> RJ.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 11:48 am to TheDoc
quote:
like when keiland and charles were on the bench as freshman until miles figured out that KW was pretty damn good?
Keiland missed fall practice due to clearinghouse issues, he arrived a few days before the first game...by most accounts, it was mid-season before him and CS knew enough of the offense to be counted on. Of course I guess they could have just thrown out the playbook and gone with "talent"...
"Toss to Keiland, everybody find someone to block, on 2"
Posted on 7/15/09 at 11:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i've heard that RJ will be the #4 WR over randall.
from where?
Posted on 7/15/09 at 11:52 am to ForeLSU
Two changes I would have made for Auburn 2006:
1. Flynn would have come in for at least one series
2. Scott/Williams would have come in for at LEAST a couple of plays.
1. Flynn would have come in for at least one series
2. Scott/Williams would have come in for at LEAST a couple of plays.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 11:56 am to TheDoc
I woulda doubled whatever the refs were getting
Posted on 7/15/09 at 12:01 pm to BT
quote:
none, coaches know more about whats going on than td posters..
Apparently you weren't a fan when Josh Reed was sitting the bench while Craig Nall and some other walk on quarterback were playing WR because we had no depth.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 12:02 pm to TheDoc
quote:
Two changes I would have made for Auburn 2006:
1. Flynn would have come in for at least one series
agree somewhat, but I would have preferred they had a package for him that could have been put in at any time like we had for RP, with an equal threat to run or pass...of course this was Jimbo.
quote:
2. Scott/Williams would have come in for at LEAST a couple of plays.
given the blocking, not sure they would have been much more effective.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 12:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
My initial reaction to seeing RJ Jackson starting ahead of Randle will be curiosity... if Jackson is ineffective ala Vincent/Broussard around 2005, then I'm sure I will second guess the coaches. If Jackson performs well, I'll be happy for him. And if Randle does start ahead of Jackson, I'll feel a little bad for Jackson, figuring he never did fully come back from the injury.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 12:20 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
from where?
From his "I'm going to go stir shite up on the Rant because it gets me off" folder.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 12:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
starts over randle this year while looking like the same RJ Jackson he's always looked like?
won't happen if he looks the same
Posted on 7/15/09 at 12:32 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
I'm well aware of what he said after the game but do you honestly think that had shite to do with the outcome of that game?
Posted on 7/15/09 at 12:38 pm to BilJ
quote:
but do you honestly think that had shite to do with the outcome of that game?
quote:
Papa Purple and Gold
Posted on 7/15/09 at 12:42 pm to truthbetold
quote:
From his "I'm going to go stir shite up on the Rant because it gets me off" folder.
yeah, basically.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 12:43 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
quote:
you forgot about pissing off Darren McFadden in 2007 by pronouncing Arkansas "R-Kansas" leading up to the game.
You never cease to amaze me.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 12:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
man who else was excited when rj got that call against georgia tech. i was like frick yes even though it was like a 1 yard gain if even that.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 1:07 pm to S
to respond to the original question...who gives a shite who starts, just win baby!
Posted on 7/15/09 at 1:10 pm to S
quote:My buddy Steve is a huge RJ Jackson fan for some reason and he went nuts.
who else was excited when rj got that call against georgia tech
Posted on 7/15/09 at 1:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
julio had an NFL body and physicality at 18 years old randle is more explosive and a better athlete, but he doesn't have JJs body. sorry
disagree that Randle is more explosive and better athlete than Julio. Hope I'm wrong, but I really don't see Randle performing at the level Julio did his first year. Julio is a freak.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News