- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:13 am to cajunjj
quote:
Mett had better improve his accuracy with the blocking he had Sat. or we might get to see Rivers
There it is
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:16 am to thelsutigerfan
the only difference was that the offensive line played very well.
that's it.
that's it.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:19 am to cajunjj
quote:
Mett had better improve his accuracy with the blocking he had Sat. or we might get to see Rivers
and this is why we cant have nice things
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:23 am to thelsutigerfan
Les finally.... kept doing what he was doing. They executed better. The only coaching changes I noticed were slightly different 3rd down play calls.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:24 am to thelsutigerfan
quote:
Improved play calling on the offense - finally Les
Its amazing how good execution makes plays look like a good call. We just executed the offense. This is why Les doesnt change, because if we play right, it works.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:25 am to CarRamrod
quote:quote:no he didnt.
Les finally listened to the rant.
He may not have listened to the Rant, but it looked like someone who shares our views had his ear for a while. And let's face it, some of the ranting here was shared by a lot of people.
quote:quote:it really didnt lok much different at all. WRs just held on to the ball and the line blocked.
6. Improved play calling on the offense - finally Les
The wide receivers held on - Yes, definitely.
The O-Line - so this game they just executed better? Who is responsible for that? Some of the "posi"-tards were saying that we didn't have an O-Line that was capable last week. They looked pretty capable on Saturday. Plus, I think that the up-tempo offense early on helped them a bunch.
The play calls were different especially before the INT and we didn't stop in the "check with me" that I noticed. The short yardage non-wildcat with Ware under center looked awesome!
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:28 am to thelsutigerfan
If Les listened to the rant we wouldn"t win 5 games a year.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:28 am to Riseupfromtherubble
This post was edited on 10/15/12 at 9:29 am
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:28 am to thelsutigerfan
quote:
Les finally listened to the rant
Delusion is the other river in Egypt.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:29 am to mmcgrath
quote:
The O-Line - so this game they just executed better? Who is responsible for that?
obviously, us.
Les was wanting them to block worse until we set it straight.
Can we tell Mett to not throw it in row 3 on the fade? It appears he has been taught to do it that way. We must address.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:29 am to CarRamrod
quote:
it really didnt lok much different at all. WRs just held on to the ball and the line blocked.
agreed at least not what I saw from my seats.
same passing plays. plenty we do not even incorporate into our game plan as i have listed many times before.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:34 am to thelsutigerfan
Good thing he finally listened to the rant and got rid of the toss everyone loves to hate. 
Posted on 10/15/12 at 9:36 am to thelsutigerfan
quote:
What was different this Saturday? Les finally listened to the rant.
quote:
6. Improved play calling on the offense - finally Les
it's called execution and it really is that simple.
quote:
3. Passing - Mett need to improve general accuracy/speed and redzone throwing. His passes hardly have any air so they need to be more accurate.
Mett needs to improve redzone recognition and our receivers need to run precise routes and get separation. still a work in progress...a weapon at TE would really help. the kid from PSU comes to mind....tall, fast and very athletic. of course, that would require Studs/Krags to think outside the box....hope, hope.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 11:18 am to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
Les was right all along too. It was the same game plan minus the drops and mistakes. Execution is the difference between winning and losing
Actually, we put a new RB in there for significant snaps. He broke the long one...even though LSU basically dominated, they still might have lost without that. Hill made some plays on calls that normally wouldn't be effective. And of course, the O-line played great.
This post was edited on 10/15/12 at 11:26 am
Posted on 10/15/12 at 11:22 am to thelsutigerfan
quote:
It's smart to look at the LSU boards for free advice.
would you like some free advice right now?
Posted on 10/15/12 at 11:23 am to SouthOfSouth
quote:
Its amazing how good execution makes plays look like a good call. We just executed the offense. This is why Les doesnt change, because if we play right, it works.
I disagree we did play some new plays and the execution was definitely better
Posted on 10/15/12 at 11:24 am to MOT
quote:
Good thing he finally listened to the rant and got rid of the toss everyone loves to hate.
It has been successful on about 2 of 30 tries this year (successful meaning actually gaining a yard).
Thanks Jeremy Hill...
Posted on 10/15/12 at 11:27 am to thelsutigerfan
Some people make me laugh. The play calling was no different than weeks past. Honestly, the play calling was't great. Especially setting up for a field goal after Reid's interception.
Posted on 10/15/12 at 11:40 am to lsutigertalk
If the play calling is good, why are 104th in the NCAA in the red zone?
Even agaisnt lesser teams like Towson , Idaho, AU and Washington, you can't will your way into the end zone with predictable calls against a nione man front.
The fade atttempt was a step int he right direction, but, yes, was poor;ly executed.
1. Poorly executed plays tend not to work , even if the call is brilliant..
2,Ill conceived calls, well executed also tend not to be successful. (see red zone discussion , above)
Proper execution of well schemed plays CAN occur simultaneously.
Even agaisnt lesser teams like Towson , Idaho, AU and Washington, you can't will your way into the end zone with predictable calls against a nione man front.
The fade atttempt was a step int he right direction, but, yes, was poor;ly executed.
1. Poorly executed plays tend not to work , even if the call is brilliant..
2,Ill conceived calls, well executed also tend not to be successful. (see red zone discussion , above)
Proper execution of well schemed plays CAN occur simultaneously.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News