Started By
Message

re: What do UGA and Texas have in common that have made them so successful?

Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:22 pm to
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
19928 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:22 pm to
NIL is pay for play and nothing to do with image and likeness. Nobody would recognize these people if they walk in front of them on the street.
And for some reason, LSU is not just giving cash on potential. The entire situation must be causing major dissensions on teams. Imagine some guy walking off the street getting double your pay after starting for a year and busting to make it 3 years in the program.
This post was edited on 12/9/24 at 5:01 pm
Posted by mhc4tigers
Member since Aug 2016
4478 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:29 pm to
Kirby is in year 8. He is not three years from having 39 players. 2020 and 2021 years were very bad for the LSU brand and roster. Completely different situation. Unfortunately because of Orgeron we got zero uptick in recruiting from the NC.
Posted by PasadenaTiger
Pasadena
Member since Jul 2012
227 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:30 pm to
Nick Saban
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Bogalusa
Member since Jul 2018
6692 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:41 pm to
The NCAA is giving the sky screamers what they wanted with NIL basically being pay for play and unlimited transfers with immediate playing opportunity. The NCAA is gonna let the fans and schools reach a fever pitch and then they’ll step in, after we’re groveling at their feet, and make kids sit out a year after transferring or limit the number of times someone can transfer.
Posted by Shaq4prez
The Deaf Dome
Member since Oct 2021
4102 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Georgia’s success isn’t built on transfers. Over the past four full recruiting classes (2021–2024), Georgia brought in just 19 transfers


When your classes are top 3 each year, you dont need transfers. Thats like saying rich people dont use coupons. Well, they dont bc they don't need to
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
132597 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:07 pm to
It took UGA 4 years to get the program to the level that it is now. Texas has not won a NC since Vince Young.
Posted by grich31
Youngsville, La
Member since May 2008
1599 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:08 pm to
Both have great player development, that seems to be the difference, signing talent is great but developing that talent to their full extent is most important
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
284802 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

You have pointed to the class of would be juniors this year that haven’t worked out as a reason for LSU’s shortcomings. That class of would be juniors next year is going to be just as bad.




2023 is in line to have 12 players on next years roster , most who contributed this season so they will be in line to contribute next as well.

2022 had like 5 that contributed & three were OL. Perkins was of course injured.


It’s not ideal but certainly will be a large improvement next year of upperclassmen contributing to the roster
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
13164 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:32 pm to
I'm not defending the 2022 class, more so saying that the 2023 isn't very good either. Guys like Toviano, Chester, Jackson, Mubenga haven't done much to get me excited about them being contributors next year.
Posted by la_birdman
Northern GA via Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31552 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Member since Dec 2024
102 posts


Hmmm
This post was edited on 12/9/24 at 2:09 pm
Posted by bengalfan50
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2009
2628 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:54 pm to
Georgia relied on talent good coaching and hard work....Texas relied on Stankey gifting them two solid years of powder puff scheduling!
Posted by LSUSAINT79
Member since Oct 2018
220 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 3:15 pm to
How many of the 41 transfers were from his first season at LSU?? He inherited a crap show.
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
28036 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 3:16 pm to
UGA's success comes from Mark Richt leaving Kirby with a treasure trove and him not starting a takeover in an NIL and transfer portal era.

He was able to become established almost immediately. Georgia is a talent rich state, top 4, and he borders Bama, Florida, and the Carolinas. He had clout from being with Nick Saban through a billion championships as well. By the time everything started changing, he was established. He got buy in before the drastic shift.

Texas's success was that it was effing Texas. People act like Tom Herman didn't get top classes. Sark was also another one propped up as a Saban disciple. He definitely improved Texas, but he's in Texas and aided by Texas billionaires. They were also aided by the easiest schedule in the SEC.

Let Kelly cook. He's dealing with different circumstances.
Posted by John Rambeaux
Heauxpe, WA
Member since Oct 2023
73 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 3:48 pm to
quote:


Well whenever all of your commits are getting offered over a million $ it’s kinda of hard to build solely through high school. And other schools like Texas and UGA keep upping the offer until our commit flips to them so frick them.


I kinda disagree here.

Texas 100% came back to relevancy in the NIL era because they could absolutely go buy players.

Georgia was already in a good place and then they happened to get the next generational coach. Once he showed kids everywhere that he was the real deal and would have Georgia competing for titles / constantly putting talent in the NFL, now kids just want to flock there.

Very, very different routes if you ask me.
Posted by GeauxJZK
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2017
1640 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 8:12 pm to
The only correct answer is money
Posted by BlueTiger23
Member since Dec 2020
450 posts
Posted on 12/10/24 at 2:37 pm to
Why do we act like Kirby took over some dead in the water program. Richt handed him the keys to a program that was already extremely competitive and had done everything except win a title. He upticked the recruiting a bit and he coaches a great defense. That’s the difference. Texas had the easiest sec schedule while also having some crazy money
Posted by thinkthenspeak
Member since Nov 2021
89 posts
Posted on 12/10/24 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

NIL is pay for play and nothing to do with image and likeness.


I've posted variations of that statement since NIL became a thing and always get negged for it. I guess some people can't deal with the truth.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram