- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:22 pm to dos crystal
quote:
23-0 Iowa and 24-3 Michigan State. I guess it’s not scheme after all
8th and 22nd in total defense, respectfully. Left that part out.
Canada is not some master-level schemer. But he demonstrates some imagination in his schemes. I didn't see imagination from Ensminger on Saturday. When you are facing a more talented team, that's when imagination is most needed.
This post was edited on 11/5/18 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:23 pm to GA Tiger
quote:
What did Matt Canada do differently last year to move ball?
Played against shite teams
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:24 pm to Ignignot
quote:
What did Matt Canada do differently last year to move ball?
Played against shite teams
LSU outgained Bama last year
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:24 pm to dos crystal
quote:
Canada has been shut out and scored exactly 3 point in his last two games. Fact.
23-0 Iowa and 24-3 Michigan State. I guess it’s not scheme after all
Have you seen what has been going on in this program, especially last week? They had 2 coaching changes last week alone. Players were protesting on twitter. Not exactly conducive to focus.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:25 pm to ibleedprplngld
quote:
Misdirection, mostly. All those moving pieces look stupid on the TV screen, but they really do serve a purpose.
this is correct. While no one is a fan of jet sweeps every drive, we probably could have used one to get Dillon (or anyone) around the edge
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:26 pm to Canwoodtiger
quote:
Matt was not the long term solution. But his offense showed some potential. Problem is it was going to be figured out eventually and the jet sweeps can only get you so far.
Maybe Canada wasn't a long-term solution, but it's not because the offense was simply going to be "figured out".
The jet sweep isn't a trick play. The offense has been around for over half a century, and the fly motion is a basic component. So many different plays can be run to off of it because it manipulates the positioning of LBs and safeties.
It's not an infallible offense, but just because it's different doesn't mean it's gimmicky or ineffective.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:28 pm to GA Tiger
Canada ran misdirection plays, sweeps, etc.. that made the Bama defense hesitate for a second which makes a huge difference. Etling also missed a few open receivers. Would have liked to see what Canada could have done with Burrow.
Ensminger runs the same offense regardless of opponent with no misdirection, no draws, or anything. It's basically a Les Miles offense that runs more shotgun formations.
I mean, we hired Les Miles' TE coach to run the offense. We were really expecting anything new against Bama?
Ensminger runs the same offense regardless of opponent with no misdirection, no draws, or anything. It's basically a Les Miles offense that runs more shotgun formations.
I mean, we hired Les Miles' TE coach to run the offense. We were really expecting anything new against Bama?
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:32 pm to RedPop4
Tua had a lot to do with it; i.e. number of possessions.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:54 pm to rbdallas
quote:
Different O Line IMHO. Also, not TUA as the QB.
How did Tua keep us from scoring exactly?
And let’s be fricking ja best about Tua. He looked average at best against us.
Back to top
