Started By
Message

re: We have a bad case of Mike Archer-itis!

Posted on 10/28/16 at 7:59 pm to
Posted by Croozin2
Somewhere on the water
Member since Dec 2004
3193 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 7:59 pm to
But the players loved him, am I wrong? Actually, I made no analogy, just a statement.
This post was edited on 10/28/16 at 8:01 pm
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 8:01 pm to
not even close to the same scenario
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
18158 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

#t! (Bill Belichick and Pete Carroll the most recent.)


Bad comparison, because both those guys failed in the NFL, which is a completely different game. See Saban and Spurrier as examples.
Posted by airbornetiger
SATX
Member since Sep 2006
1416 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:08 pm to
So we are looking at something 30 or so years ago. Not relevant at all. MA at the times was the--or one of the--youngest head coaches around. He had no prior relevant HC experience, and quite honestly, his follow-on history proved he was never HC material to begin with. He got the job because LSU was cheap--very cheap. They were fortunate with the BA hire.
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3476 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 3:14 am to
This a totally not a well thought out topic.


To say Mike Archer could and would not recruit is totally false, as Mike was the main recruiter from Bill's time as coach as Bill did not like to recruit and did very little to help recruiting (So Mike became the man on the recruiting front for LSU in Bill's time).


How many times do I have to post prop 48 killed Louisiana recruiting and LSU and the staff recruited out of state to help and signed many in the top 50 national only to have all fail.

Hindsight is at best 20/20, but this thread makes it like 90/100 as most forget that Steve had near no recruiting experience, he was a USFL coach (Tampa Bay Bandits). Steve would coach Duke the next season as his first year as a head coach at a college.

Steve's record at Tampa Bay Bandits at the time was 35-21. Before that he was a QB coach at Florida and Georgia Tech, then the OC at Duke.


What we have today is totally different situation, LSU is looked at as a top 5 job, back then it was not. Today LSU is a recruiting powerhouse, back then it was not.
This post was edited on 10/29/16 at 3:40 am
Posted by JohnnyU
Florida
Member since Nov 2006
12350 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 6:10 am to
quote:

After Bill Arnsparger's successful run we transitioned into Mike Archer. Shoulda, coulda, woulda'd on Steve Spurrier.


Different circumstances and a foolish decision. I'm okay with Orgeron if he is the best available. First, he has to get the most out of this team for the remainder of the season. It doesn't just all come down to Alabama.
We know he can recruit. However LSU's brand is stronger now (vs 1988) so recruiting is not going to suffer with any coach worth a damn. Does he have the goods in other areas: organization, vision, academics, discipline, hiring/retaining great coordinators and assistants and attention to detail? It's a big job.
We have no idea who has inquired about the job or their real level of interest vs obtaining leverage in their current job.
Just let it play out. We could certainly do worse than Orgeron but maybe we could do better.
Posted by mpwilging
Punta Gorda Isles, Florida
Member since Jan 2011
7012 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 6:54 am to
quote:

But the players love to win


FIFY

It's all about the W...
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
12519 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 8:44 am to
Agree with OP, Archer failed because he did not recruit and was not a disciplinarian when he needed to be. CEO does not share those weaknesses with Archer.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11201 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 8:55 am to
Archer was a "players coach" just like O.

Nobody's suggesting we get rid of Coach O. We can keep him on for recruiting coordinator, assistant head coach, etc. Give him a raise. whatever. But he wont bring anything more to the program by being HC than he's already doing as a recruiter/DL coach. What this staff needs is what its been needing since Jimbo left- a good tactician on the offensive side of the ball. Thats the only way to reach LSU's true potential of domination on both sides of the ball. Not just a dominant defense and then try to score a few points on offense with incredible athletes. That was the Miles way, and thats what we'd be with Coach O relying on whatever O coordinator we can find. (recruit better athletes and then get outcoached on game day so every game comes down to the wire. No thanks, been there, done that.)
This post was edited on 10/29/16 at 9:03 am
Posted by LSU Groupee
Member since Oct 2012
4026 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 9:06 am to
quote:

there are many a great football coach that have failed at the first stop


Name the SEC coaches who got fired for winning less than 40% of their games and their next head coach job was in the SEC.

If Les hadn't been fired and we were 5-2 after three wins over bad teams, this board would be screaming that those three wins didn't mean shite. Now, those same three wins are reason to hire a position coach from Les' staff.

Stupid does run deep on the rant!
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3476 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 9:57 am to
LSUtoBOOT do you even remember the recruiting back then or the names of the recruits and where they were ranked?

Mike recruited and no recruit from Louisiana made All American out of state.

The best 2 to leave the state at that time were Carr to Clemson and Jackson to Pitt.

Prop 48 killed Louisiana recruiting, so Mike and the staff recruited Florida, Miss. and Texas.

Near every recruit brought in with a higher ranking out of high school failed once in college level talent.

Recruiting back then is not like today.

Oh and who was that recruited and visited near all those recruits so much because Bill hated to recruit, oh that was Archer.

Disciplinarian, nice word, but no LSU coach was like that, not Charlie, not Stovall, not Bill and not Paul. How many fights did players have time and time again in the 50's-80's and near nothing was done? I had friends that got into fights with the players in those days. Class work? Like Pete how many missed classes and nothing was done? Not a good word to use in this miss guided thread.
This post was edited on 10/29/16 at 9:59 am
Posted by deepdeltatiger
Myrtle Grove
Member since Aug 2007
930 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 10:17 am to
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34393 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Nobody's suggesting we get rid of Coach O. We can keep him on for recruiting coordinator, assistant head coach, etc.


It's delusional to think this is going to happen.
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
12519 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 11:52 am to
Tigger1, recruiting is not just about going to the house of the recruit, it's also about knowing which house to go to, no matter which state it is located. Discipline is not just about off field behavior, but also on field focus, preparation, and accountability. Archer's teams got progressively worse each year, after a great first year. Perhaps you can tell us why that is the case if he was such a good recruiter and as good (or bad) a disciplinarian as the others you mentioned, with which I respectfully disagree.
Posted by roger79
Welcome Home, Scott
Member since Dec 2012
3226 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

We have a bad case of Mike Archer-itis!


I thought you were trying to douse the desire of the people who want to hire Orgeron. I was ready to support you until I read your post.
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8967 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Im on board the CEO train.


Yes I can understand the enthusiasm for CEO right now, but the beauty of the CEO train is that you can wait 4 weeks to be on board. It is smarter to sit and watch how the next 4 weeks go because WE ARE NOT going to hire a coach before the end of the TAMU game for sure. I love CEO also but I have time to hop on the train, being early here doesn't matter ONE bit!!!

Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3476 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 12:29 pm to
Maybe LSUtoBOOT that has much to do with prop 48 destroying many football teams at the time, only Miss St, Texas A&M and a few other teams faired better than us because the head coaches at those schools recruited the JuCo ranks, which Archer was not allowed to do other than for the 2-3 Louisiana recruits LSU was hard after?

Every think about that?

Or the fact our secondary, lb and dl position were thin when Bill left and if not for Young and Harmon coming in from the SMU death penalty we would not have won 10 games in 1987?


It is a fact LSU would not recruit JuCo at a time we were super thin at 3 positions, and by 1989 our OL was down to near nothing and that was our strong point, injuries, and players quitting caused that. The powers in power at LSU at the time would not let the staff recruit JuCo, that is the only way LSU likely could have kept a winning record at time.

This post was edited on 10/29/16 at 1:53 pm
Posted by Tiger in Texas
Houston, Texas
Member since Sep 2004
20898 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

I used it to show why I think people are afraid to hire Oregon


We all know Archer was a 'player's coach' like O, but that is where the comparison ends.
Archer was a terrible recruiter and whether his fault or not, did not have the best coaches.
Coach O on the other hand, is a great recruiter, this is his dream job, he also knows LSU has the $$ to bring in the best OC money can buy.
Posted by TigerNlc
Chocolate City
Member since Jun 2006
32513 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 1:27 pm to
Fun fact, Les Miles won the same amount of national titles as Steve Spurrier.
Posted by SL Tiger
Houston
Member since May 2007
2224 posts
Posted on 10/29/16 at 2:33 pm to
I'm pretty sure that we hired Archer mostly because Arnsparger told us to. He wasn't at LSU long enough to influence that decision...but he did.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram