Started By
Message

re: Was Miles Playing for 40-50 YD Field Goal?

Posted on 10/5/09 at 8:56 pm to
Posted by mprtiger
Temple, Tx
Member since Jul 2009
1179 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

Thanks and Congrats to Charles Scott on the winning run. That was outstanding.

However, no one expected him to break a run like that. So my question is was Les going to be content w/ a 50-yd fieldgoal?

Also, in an obvious passing situation Miles wanted to run. So, was he that confident in the run game or did he not have any confidence in the pass game?

I know my thoughts on these questions, but would like to hear everyone else chime in.
Who gives a shite, we won, get over it and lets move on to florida.
Posted by XbengalTiger
New Bama Standard 9-4
Member since Oct 2003
5574 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

I like Miles, but come on, if there is any truth to a Soph bringing up the fact we need to avoid a negative yardage play
This thread is a perfect example of why Miles will never be a good coach to some of the haters. Half of the haters are bitching because we ran the ball and we won "in spite" of our coaching. Still other haters are bitching because our coaches might have called a play-action pass before deciding to run it one more time and it could have resulted in a negative play. The haters are covered either way. Truly pathetic!!
Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5725 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:10 pm to
WTH is everyone talking about? This question is absurd. IT WAS SECOND AND 5!!

You bet we had less of a chance to score a TD (Common sense)........but that doesnt mean it wasnt one of our goals. Our priorities were with sustaining the drive, getting a first down, and getting the ball closer into scoring position. We still had a timeout left with 54 sec to go. Two downs to gain just 5 yards for the 1st.........10-15 yards out from a VERY makable FG. Geeeez.

Whats up with this "settling for a 40-50 YD field goal" nonsense?
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60729 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

why Miles will never be a good coach to some of the haters


I dont even know what a 'hater' is.

I like Miles, and have defended him to the mockery of EVERYONE that is not a diehard LSU fan, and to about 20 percent of those.

His track record of strange decision making is beginning to make any arguments to the contrary moot. So any doubt of his strategic decisions is based off what is fast becoming a track record of odd (if nothing else) in game decisions.

Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11242 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:17 pm to
No he wasn't, Crowton had a play action pass called. JJ called a TO and said he'd rather keep on running it or something along that nature. BAM TD. OMG MILES WAS PLAYING FOR THE FG OMG NO!!!! oh wait...
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60729 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

JJ called a TO and said he'd rather keep on running it or something along that nature


So we ran it on first, did not call a timeout, sent a play in...then the Soph QB called the timeout after precious seconds ran off the clock? I dont remember it that way, I remember our TO immediately after the run on first. As it should have been.

Your scenario stinks as a coaching decision any way you stack it.

PS. Who in the hell would call a play action pass when there is little time left on the clock AND no real threat to run.

Of course, we did run it......that may be the genius that is Les Miles.
Posted by triplesauce
new york
Member since Oct 2006
1471 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:34 pm to


Maybe JJ should call all the plays.
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Ft. Lauderdale
Member since Jul 2005
33267 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

Have not seen the newspaper. Is that where from this info came?
Why am I not suprised? You're usually wrong on most of your analysis and woefully uninformed.
Posted by RummelTiger
Official TD Sauces Club Member
Member since Aug 2004
93024 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

I know my thoughts on these questions, but would like to hear everyone else chime in.



I've learned to not question anything when it works.
Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5725 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

PS. Who in the hell would call a play action pass when there is little time left on the clock AND no real threat to run.

No threat to run on second down and 5 with a timeout to burn on UGA's 33........almost a minute left on the clock? That's odd considering UGA was defending the run on that play and had everyone on the line.

This board never ceases to amaze me.
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

This thread is a perfect example of why Miles will never be a good coach to some of the haters. Half of the haters are bitching because we ran the ball and we won "in spite" of our coaching. Still other haters are bitching because our coaches might have called a play-action pass before deciding to run it one more time and it could have resulted in a negative play. The haters are covered either way. Truly pathetic!!

Come on now. You kinda gotta love those guys. They're kinda like that "unique" uncle who keeps insisting that floridated water is a communist plot or that we never went to the moon. Not always the most logical but heck, their rants do make for some intersting conversation from time to time.
Posted by GeauxBayouBengals
Member since Nov 2003
6236 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:47 pm to
OK jackass, everything you've said on this thread is wrong and has been proven to be wrong. You're really criticizing a run play on 2nd and 5 in field goal range and with 1 timeout and almost a minute left on the clock? You need to get on here and man up and admit what an idiot you are for starting this, because you didn't have your facts straight. Come on jackass let's have it. But no, you'll never admit it, you'll ignore this thread and start another one to stir some more crap up until you get called out on it once again. I have heard that a retroactive birth control is close to being developed. Is there anyway we could get your father to be a test subject for it?
This post was edited on 10/5/09 at 9:49 pm
Posted by specs1
Member since Dec 2005
10015 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

for starting this, because you didn't have your facts straight



See original thread below. Note it is only posing questions.

quote:

Thanks and Congrats to Charles Scott on the winning run. That was outstanding.

However, no one expected him to break a run like that. So my question is was Les going to be content w/ a 50-yd fieldgoal?

Also, in an obvious passing situation Miles wanted to run. So, was he that confident in the run game or did he not have any confidence in the pass game?

I know my thoughts on these questions, but would like to hear everyone else chime in.


Furthermore loser I'll continue to post whatever topic I deem interesting and worthy of posting.

Signed: Those of Us Who Attended the GAME!




Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5725 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

See original thread below. Note it is only posing questions.

Questions based on a false premise. Why ask if we were settling for a 40-50 yard FG? Why not a 15-20 yard FG? Or 30-40 yard FG?

IT WAS 2ND DOWN AND 5.......1 TIMEOUT.......ALMOST A MINUTE LEFT AT THE UGA 33.

How is asking if the coach was purposely settling on NOT gaining more than 5 yards in 2 downs NOT DUMB?
quote:

Was Miles Playing for 40-50 YD Field Goal?

Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 10:30 pm to
In 2007, against Florida, it was widely reported that the players afffected the offensive play calling. Some of the 4th down tries and the march down the field in the 4th (runs with Hester behind the offensive line). Why would it shock anyone for today's players to affect the play calling? It is Miles' M.O. It is also part of why his players will definitley run through a brick wall for him. Too late for him to change now. You haters will have to go on hating. He will be here for a while longer.

And NO, It was not an obvious passing down. If I were him, I would have been playing for a short FG/TD with no time left on the clock, therefore, I would have likely run at some point.
This post was edited on 10/5/09 at 10:32 pm
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

Crowton said his plan was to gain at least 5 more yards, which would have left Josh Jasper with a long field goal try to win the game.


Looks like Crowton/Miles were happy to try a long (relatively) field goal.

This article answers almost all the questions posed in this thread. Some will not like the answers.

ESPN
This post was edited on 10/5/09 at 10:56 pm
Posted by DomePatrol
Murphy, TX
Member since Aug 2005
224 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 11:43 pm to
Ask Auburn 2007 if he was playing for a field goal.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 10/6/09 at 12:18 am to
Did you read the article? The author atributes Crowton as saying they were content with the FG try. It's not a direct quote but, I guess you know more. OK.
This post was edited on 10/6/09 at 12:20 am
Posted by MemphisJerk
Memphis You Jerk
Member since Oct 2008
865 posts
Posted on 10/6/09 at 1:00 am to
Did we all forget the end of the 2007 Auburn game? Worked out, but c'mon that was just ridiculous...mad hatter indeed.
Posted by ultratiger89
Houston, Tx
Member since Aug 2007
3666 posts
Posted on 10/6/09 at 3:17 am to
quote:

Was Miles Playing for 40-50 YD Field Goal?


no
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram