- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Was Miles Playing for 40-50 YD Field Goal?
Posted on 10/5/09 at 8:56 pm to specs1
Posted on 10/5/09 at 8:56 pm to specs1
quote:Who gives a shite, we won, get over it and lets move on to florida.
Thanks and Congrats to Charles Scott on the winning run. That was outstanding.
However, no one expected him to break a run like that. So my question is was Les going to be content w/ a 50-yd fieldgoal?
Also, in an obvious passing situation Miles wanted to run. So, was he that confident in the run game or did he not have any confidence in the pass game?
I know my thoughts on these questions, but would like to hear everyone else chime in.
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:04 pm to tigerfoot
quote:This thread is a perfect example of why Miles will never be a good coach to some of the haters. Half of the haters are bitching because we ran the ball and we won "in spite" of our coaching. Still other haters are bitching because our coaches might have called a play-action pass before deciding to run it one more time and it could have resulted in a negative play. The haters are covered either way. Truly pathetic!!
I like Miles, but come on, if there is any truth to a Soph bringing up the fact we need to avoid a negative yardage play
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:10 pm to specs1
WTH is everyone talking about? This question is absurd. IT WAS SECOND AND 5!!
You bet we had less of a chance to score a TD (Common sense)........but that doesnt mean it wasnt one of our goals. Our priorities were with sustaining the drive, getting a first down, and getting the ball closer into scoring position. We still had a timeout left with 54 sec to go. Two downs to gain just 5 yards for the 1st.........10-15 yards out from a VERY makable FG. Geeeez.
Whats up with this "settling for a 40-50 YD field goal" nonsense?
You bet we had less of a chance to score a TD (Common sense)........but that doesnt mean it wasnt one of our goals. Our priorities were with sustaining the drive, getting a first down, and getting the ball closer into scoring position. We still had a timeout left with 54 sec to go. Two downs to gain just 5 yards for the 1st.........10-15 yards out from a VERY makable FG. Geeeez.
Whats up with this "settling for a 40-50 YD field goal" nonsense?
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:14 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:
why Miles will never be a good coach to some of the haters
I dont even know what a 'hater' is.
I like Miles, and have defended him to the mockery of EVERYONE that is not a diehard LSU fan, and to about 20 percent of those.
His track record of strange decision making is beginning to make any arguments to the contrary moot. So any doubt of his strategic decisions is based off what is fast becoming a track record of odd (if nothing else) in game decisions.
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:17 pm to specs1
No he wasn't, Crowton had a play action pass called. JJ called a TO and said he'd rather keep on running it or something along that nature. BAM TD. OMG MILES WAS PLAYING FOR THE FG OMG NO!!!! oh wait...
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:29 pm to LSURep864
quote:
JJ called a TO and said he'd rather keep on running it or something along that nature
So we ran it on first, did not call a timeout, sent a play in...then the Soph QB called the timeout after precious seconds ran off the clock? I dont remember it that way, I remember our TO immediately after the run on first. As it should have been.
Your scenario stinks as a coaching decision any way you stack it.
PS. Who in the hell would call a play action pass when there is little time left on the clock AND no real threat to run.
Of course, we did run it......that may be the genius that is Les Miles.
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:34 pm to specs1
Maybe JJ should call all the plays.
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:35 pm to specs1
quote:Why am I not suprised? You're usually wrong on most of your analysis and woefully uninformed.
Have not seen the newspaper. Is that where from this info came?
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:38 pm to specs1
quote:
I know my thoughts on these questions, but would like to hear everyone else chime in.
I've learned to not question anything when it works.
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:39 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
PS. Who in the hell would call a play action pass when there is little time left on the clock AND no real threat to run.
No threat to run on second down and 5 with a timeout to burn on UGA's 33........almost a minute left on the clock? That's odd considering UGA was defending the run on that play and had everyone on the line.
This board never ceases to amaze me.
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:45 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:
This thread is a perfect example of why Miles will never be a good coach to some of the haters. Half of the haters are bitching because we ran the ball and we won "in spite" of our coaching. Still other haters are bitching because our coaches might have called a play-action pass before deciding to run it one more time and it could have resulted in a negative play. The haters are covered either way. Truly pathetic!!
Come on now. You kinda gotta love those guys. They're kinda like that "unique" uncle who keeps insisting that floridated water is a communist plot or that we never went to the moon. Not always the most logical but heck, their rants do make for some intersting conversation from time to time.
Posted on 10/5/09 at 9:47 pm to specs1
OK jackass, everything you've said on this thread is wrong and has been proven to be wrong. You're really criticizing a run play on 2nd and 5 in field goal range and with 1 timeout and almost a minute left on the clock? You need to get on here and man up and admit what an idiot you are for starting this, because you didn't have your facts straight. Come on jackass let's have it. But no, you'll never admit it, you'll ignore this thread and start another one to stir some more crap up until you get called out on it once again. I have heard that a retroactive birth control is close to being developed. Is there anyway we could get your father to be a test subject for it?
This post was edited on 10/5/09 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 10/5/09 at 10:14 pm to GeauxBayouBengals
quote:
for starting this, because you didn't have your facts straight
See original thread below. Note it is only posing questions.
quote:
Thanks and Congrats to Charles Scott on the winning run. That was outstanding.
However, no one expected him to break a run like that. So my question is was Les going to be content w/ a 50-yd fieldgoal?
Also, in an obvious passing situation Miles wanted to run. So, was he that confident in the run game or did he not have any confidence in the pass game?
I know my thoughts on these questions, but would like to hear everyone else chime in.
Furthermore loser I'll continue to post whatever topic I deem interesting and worthy of posting.
Signed: Those of Us Who Attended the GAME!
Posted on 10/5/09 at 10:29 pm to specs1
quote:
See original thread below. Note it is only posing questions.
Questions based on a false premise. Why ask if we were settling for a 40-50 yard FG? Why not a 15-20 yard FG? Or 30-40 yard FG?
IT WAS 2ND DOWN AND 5.......1 TIMEOUT.......ALMOST A MINUTE LEFT AT THE UGA 33.
How is asking if the coach was purposely settling on NOT gaining more than 5 yards in 2 downs NOT DUMB?
quote:
Was Miles Playing for 40-50 YD Field Goal?
Posted on 10/5/09 at 10:30 pm to specs1
In 2007, against Florida, it was widely reported that the players afffected the offensive play calling. Some of the 4th down tries and the march down the field in the 4th (runs with Hester behind the offensive line). Why would it shock anyone for today's players to affect the play calling? It is Miles' M.O. It is also part of why his players will definitley run through a brick wall for him. Too late for him to change now. You haters will have to go on hating. He will be here for a while longer.
And NO, It was not an obvious passing down. If I were him, I would have been playing for a short FG/TD with no time left on the clock, therefore, I would have likely run at some point.
And NO, It was not an obvious passing down. If I were him, I would have been playing for a short FG/TD with no time left on the clock, therefore, I would have likely run at some point.
This post was edited on 10/5/09 at 10:32 pm
Posted on 10/5/09 at 10:53 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Crowton said his plan was to gain at least 5 more yards, which would have left Josh Jasper with a long field goal try to win the game.
Looks like Crowton/Miles were happy to try a long (relatively) field goal.
This article answers almost all the questions posed in this thread. Some will not like the answers.
ESPN
This post was edited on 10/5/09 at 10:56 pm
Posted on 10/5/09 at 11:43 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
Ask Auburn 2007 if he was playing for a field goal.
Posted on 10/6/09 at 12:18 am to DomePatrol
Did you read the article? The author atributes Crowton as saying they were content with the FG try. It's not a direct quote but, I guess you know more. OK.
This post was edited on 10/6/09 at 12:20 am
Posted on 10/6/09 at 1:00 am to Sid in Lakeshore
Did we all forget the end of the 2007 Auburn game? Worked out, but c'mon that was just ridiculous...mad hatter indeed.
Posted on 10/6/09 at 3:17 am to specs1
quote:
Was Miles Playing for 40-50 YD Field Goal?
no
Popular
Back to top


0






