- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/27/22 at 6:52 pm to Miketheseventh
Very athletic play by a very athletic player. Obviously he is safe bc I bleed P&G. If we were in the field, an obvious out.
Either way. It’s great to read the excitement on our first postseason game of the season.
Let’s carry this positivity for the next few rds.
Either way. It’s great to read the excitement on our first postseason game of the season.
Let’s carry this positivity for the next few rds.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 6:58 pm to kciDAtaE
quote:
If we were in the field, an obvious out.
Only if you’re a moron.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 7:06 pm to Byrdybyrd05
So with the tag……….does any part of the glove touch him and he is out? Or does it need to be full glove tag out? Because the edge of the glove obviously brushes the jersey first but the full tag was after.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 7:07 pm to Palm Beach Tiger
No it doesn’t.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 7:15 pm to Byrdybyrd05
Safe. There was no conclusive evidence to overturn that call.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 7:21 pm to Palm Beach Tiger
quote:
any part of the glove touch him and he is out
yes -
That was technically an out even it it barely brushed a wrinkle in the shirt.
But it would take a slo-mo replay to see it.
The catcher obviously thought he had not made contact so he continued toward a solid contact.
No way any ump would see that in real time.
Don't know why they didn't overturn it in the review tho.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 7:22 pm to geauxpurple
quote:
no conclusive evidence
What do you call the shirt reacting to the glove contact??
look - I;ve been following LSU sports since 1948 - and have seen many many bad decisions, most of which seemed to go agains LSU. But I can recognize those rare occasions when we get a break - that was one of them.
Doesn't bother me a bit to say = "bad calls go both ways - we got by with one this time."
This post was edited on 5/27/22 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 5/27/22 at 7:24 pm to geauxpurple
quote:
There was no conclusive evidence to overturn that call.
wrong. Umps CONFIRMED the call
Posted on 5/27/22 at 7:30 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
What do you call the shirt reacting to the glove contact?
Are there really LSU fans in here trying to say that crews was out?
I would guess none of those people watched the game. There was an angle on the replay that clearly showed when Crews reached the plate, and you could see space between the glove and Crews body.
I saw the shirt argument last night. Are you idiots really under the assumption that when a player is running full speed, then diving and sliding across the dirt that their shirt would be perfectly still? The call was CONFIRMED, not just upheld. He was safe. And if you would reverse the jerseys in that situation, the Kentucky kid would have been safe.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 7:32 pm to Byrdybyrd05
Did he slide into home and feel a little foam?
Posted on 5/27/22 at 9:03 pm to LSUmomma
Maybe a stupid question but do you have to tag the runner or the clothing? Maybe that's the argument being made.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 9:29 pm to otowntiger
quote:
the official had by far the absolute best view of the play. He literally was right on top of it, in that he was directly above it.
Exactly what I said last night
Posted on 5/27/22 at 9:34 pm to Burreaux09
quote:
Man this gif makes me wanna watch the movie.
Great movie. Never a waste of time
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News