- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/19/17 at 1:36 pm to Mac
quote:Fairly obvious Glover has no clue how this works.
“So if the king of LSU wants his cut of the beer money, let's make sure the kids get theirs, too,” Glover said.
Posted on 4/19/17 at 1:41 pm to pellietigersaint
I believe Cedric owned King.
Posted on 4/19/17 at 1:43 pm to chinhoyang
quote:
I believe Cedric owned King.
Elaborate.
Posted on 4/19/17 at 1:46 pm to ProjectP2294
Cedric was absolutely correct in his response (and to some degree in his original post).
No reason why student athelets shouldn't share in all this revenue (which would require an NCAA rule change).
The student athletes get screwed financially.
No reason why student athelets shouldn't share in all this revenue (which would require an NCAA rule change).
The student athletes get screwed financially.
Posted on 4/19/17 at 1:48 pm to chinhoyang
quote:
No reason why student athelets shouldn't share in all this revenue (which would require an NCAA rule change).
What does that have to do with licensing the LSU logo to a local brewery?
Posted on 4/19/17 at 1:57 pm to ProjectP2294
It has nothing to do with the original issue. He's deflecting.
Posted on 4/19/17 at 2:00 pm to chinhoyang
quote:
No reason why student athelets shouldn't share in all this revenue
You do realize how many student athletes there are in this country right?
This post was edited on 4/19/17 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 4/19/17 at 2:07 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
You do realize how many student athletes there are in this country right?
You do realize how much money student athletes generate for their schools? It is well over $1.0 billion.
Posted on 4/19/17 at 2:11 pm to chinhoyang
quote:
You do realize how much money student athletes generate for their schools? It is well over $1.0 billion.
And how is this relevant to pushing a bill that would disallow LSU to license their logo to a local brewery?
Posted on 4/19/17 at 2:12 pm to chinhoyang
quote:
It is well over $1.0 billion
sure do.
So lets say it was $2 billion. Between 460,000 student athletes that would be roughly $4500 per athlete.
Posted on 4/19/17 at 2:13 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
civiltiger07
Why are you playing into the deflection?
Posted on 4/19/17 at 2:14 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
Why are you playing into the deflection?
The deflection is still a terrible point. Just showing that
Posted on 4/19/17 at 2:28 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
So lets say it was $2 billion. Between 460,000 student athletes that would be roughly $4500 per athlete.
And a slice of that revenue should go to the athletes.
Posted on 4/19/17 at 2:30 pm to chinhoyang
quote:
And a slice of that revenue should go to the athletes.
And what relevance has that to the issue at hand?
Posted on 4/19/17 at 2:43 pm to chinhoyang
quote:I think student athletes should get a slice of pie (*upon graduating), but has little to do with his bill, or Fking. It's just political noise for ignorant folk.
And a slice of that revenue should go to the athletes.
Posted on 4/20/17 at 7:21 am to Mac
Think of the money the school could pull with this deal. It doesn't make a lot of sense to oppose this.
Posted on 4/20/17 at 8:59 am to Wayne Campbell
4-YR grad rate for freshman class of 2012 was 38%.
Not that this will sway your opinion, but here's your requested link. This is obviously a number that the University wants to improve. As an effort to improve that number, the University tries to consistently deliver a message to incoming students that partying your way through year 1 is a good way to become part of this statistic. My point that you will gloss over is that branding a beer with the LSU logo puts LSU in an inherently conflicting message.
Plus, LSU endangers itself in becoming "Hold my beer and watch this" State University. It's not worth the revenue. If you value higher education, bite the bullet and demand that your state legislature properly fund it through *gasp* taxes rather than having a bake, err beer sale.
Not that this will sway your opinion, but here's your requested link. This is obviously a number that the University wants to improve. As an effort to improve that number, the University tries to consistently deliver a message to incoming students that partying your way through year 1 is a good way to become part of this statistic. My point that you will gloss over is that branding a beer with the LSU logo puts LSU in an inherently conflicting message.
Plus, LSU endangers itself in becoming "Hold my beer and watch this" State University. It's not worth the revenue. If you value higher education, bite the bullet and demand that your state legislature properly fund it through *gasp* taxes rather than having a bake, err beer sale.
Posted on 4/20/17 at 9:11 am to victoire sécurisé
quote:
4-YR grad rate for freshman class of 2012 was 38%.
The 4-year graduation rate does not equal half of a freshman class flunking out or failing, as your first comment claimed. The average time spent in college is right about 5 years now as is indicated by your own link.
quote:
My point that you will gloss over is that branding a beer with the LSU logo puts LSU in an inherently conflicting message.
I'm not glossing over your point, I fully disagree with it. I guess all alcohol ads where the companies say "Enjoy responsibly" is conflicting as well? How can they sell alcohol while encouraging responsibility.
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:06 am to Wayne Campbell
Cedric may be accomplishing the impossible:
He's making F. King look reasonable.
He's making F. King look reasonable.
Popular
Back to top
