- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: True or false. Dave Aranda could make LSU a dynasty
Posted on 9/27/18 at 4:08 pm to AshLSU
Posted on 9/27/18 at 4:08 pm to AshLSU
Aranda will be here one more year. Then it is head coach or NFL. His biggest concern will,be what age his children are. Orgeron is doing very well and has us on the right path. We have Arandas replacement on the staff. Bush is the defensive coordinator in waiting.
0
Posted on 9/27/18 at 4:10 pm to AshLSU
You need to be a top knotch recruiter to make a great dynasty. He seems like a great x and o's guy behind the scenes but not much of a people person to be a great recruiter imo. So no probably not.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 4:14 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
So yall cried and melted over the O hire because he wasn't successful as a head coach and LSU should hire a proven winner...and now a DC who has never coached is acceptable
I never was married to the idea that LSU needed to hire a proven winner. History has proven that at any given time there are coordinators out there that will prove to be great HCs in the future. They just need to be given their shot.
None of that means I wanted to hire someone with bad experience. I'd rather no experience if we're talking about hiring a bright coordinator for the job over bad experience.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 4:22 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
So yall cried and melted over the O hire because he wasn't successful as a head coach and LSU should hire a proven winner...and now a DC who has never coached is acceptable
There are 3 tiers of possible coaching candidates.
1. Proven winners as HC.
2. Proven winners as coordinators
3. Proven losers as HC
Which one do you think is the worst choice?
Posted on 9/27/18 at 4:22 pm to AshLSU
Too late. The dynasty will be established by Orgeron before Aranda takes the reins.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 4:24 pm to justice
quote:
he’d driven a program into the toilet already.
Ole Miss? they have always been in the toilet
Posted on 9/27/18 at 4:28 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
They just need to be given their shot.
but giving someone a "shot" isn't what the anti O guys were saying...a proven winner was what they wanted
Posted on 9/27/18 at 4:50 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
So yall cried and melted over the O hire because he wasn't successful as a head coach
because he was already an UNsuccessful HC.
BIG difference there man
Posted on 9/27/18 at 5:22 pm to AshLSU
Oh how different these responses would have been if you started this thread exactly one week ago.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 5:23 pm to AshLSU
Impossible to know. Not every great coordinator has turned into a great head coach
Posted on 9/27/18 at 5:27 pm to AshLSU
A great D Coordinator does not always = a great head coach. Just ask Muschamp.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 5:32 pm to MardiGrasCajun
quote:
Not if it's about money. He currently makes more money than most NFL defensive coordinators.
A&M was ready to throw the bank at him last year. Other desperate schools will too.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 5:59 pm to Datfish
If LSU becomes a dynasty, I would give a RAT's arse who the coach is or who gets the credit 
Posted on 9/27/18 at 7:14 pm to I-H8-BAMA
quote:
quote: loose
Ugh..
God damnit. And I know better.
I deserve this one. Lol. Thanks for calling me out on it.
Doh!!!
Posted on 9/27/18 at 7:25 pm to SammyTiger
Curious, how much does the DC make in the NFL? Tried looking it up but the figures that I saw must not be right with what he’s being paid.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 7:28 pm to AshLSU
negative.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 7:42 pm to atltiger6487
quote:
Our next head coach will be one with a proven record of success as a head coach.
I think this is a very shortsighted approach.
Kirby had zero experience before he took over UGA.
Jimbo had no experience when he took over Florida State.
And many coaches who have been successil at their first job at a small school were disasters when they got to the “big leagues”
But Aranda seems to have the personality traits and attention to detail the suggest he would be successful
And if we are being honest, given Os history as a head coach, Aranda pribably would have been a less risky pick for LSU than Ed was.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 7:48 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
So yall cried and melted over the O hire because he wasn't successful as a head coach and LSU should hire a proven winner...and now a DC who has never coached is acceptable
You should be smart enough to see the difference but obviously you are not.
While Aranda has never been a HC, O was previously a historic level disaster.
This post was edited on 9/27/18 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 9/27/18 at 9:56 pm to AshLSU
quote:
I say he could
I have no idea
quote:
He looks like the type that hates to loose more than he likes to win.
There’s a big difference between loose and lose. In any event, hating to lose is not much of a recommendation. I’m fairly sure every coach hates to lose.
A great coach can sell people on his vision and manage a lot of processes at the same time. He’s a motivator and an administrator. Being good at X’s and O’s, which we know Aranda has mastered, has little to do with it.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News