- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Top Billin - Derek Stingley
Posted on 9/11/19 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 9/11/19 at 12:58 pm
Youtube
Great video and reminded me how the refs stole an interception from this dude.
The fact that it was called a reception on the field blows my mind. Both hands on the ball and knee in bounds.
Great video and reminded me how the refs stole an interception from this dude.
The fact that it was called a reception on the field blows my mind. Both hands on the ball and knee in bounds.
This post was edited on 9/11/19 at 1:02 pm
11
Posted on 9/11/19 at 12:59 pm to jyoung1
I thought it was ruled an incomplete pass 
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:00 pm to jyoung1
It touched before then. Other camera angle from the field side caught it.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:00 pm to LSUNV
political call......it was an interception.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:02 pm to jimbeam
quote:
It touched before then.
The other camera angle looked like it was either resting on his hand or on Johnson's body, but doesn't show it touching ground.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:03 pm to LSUNV
quote:
I thought it was ruled an incomplete pass
Ref called it a reception on the field initially.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:03 pm to jyoung1
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/7/21 at 10:03 am
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:03 pm to jimbeam
It was not definitive that ball hit the ground. It was dark and blocked by the WR knee and you could assume it hit the ground but there was no conclusive evidence it hit the ground. I’ve watch the replay 10 times.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:04 pm to LSUNV
quote:
I thought it was ruled an incomplete pass
It was but the angle above was only shown once on the broadcast, it was a interception, that ball did not touch the ground. Stingley made a Honeybadger type play and did not get credit.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:04 pm to jyoung1
quote:
The fact that it was called a reception
But it wasn't called a reception.
quote:
Both hands on the ball and knee in bounds
The ball pretty clearly hit the ground on one of the camera views. Anybody arguing against it needs to take their purple and gold glasses off for a minute to see it probably.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:06 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
First off, it was ruled complete so your wrong. Secondly, if it hit the ground why haven’t I see one still shot showing that.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:06 pm to jyoung1
I was at the game and was so confused how they ruled it a reception. It was either an incomplete pass or Stingley had it. Not sure if I am remembering right but I don't think the ref's even explained the results of their review.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:10 pm to LSUNV
Ball hit the ground, they showed it very clearly on tv in a different angle
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:10 pm to Rtowntiger
If the call on the field had been interception, I think it stands.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:10 pm to jyoung1
You posted a video clearly showing an incomplete pass 
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:13 pm to jyoung1
Originally it was called a reception for Texas which changed everything.
The replay showed that it was definitely not a reception by Texas because he never had possession of the ball but there was a doubt whether it hit the ground before Stingley secures it.
If it would have been called INT by Stingley to begin with I don’t thing they overturn it but they could overturn the call that was made on the field because it was obvious that he never had possession.
The replay showed that it was definitely not a reception by Texas because he never had possession of the ball but there was a doubt whether it hit the ground before Stingley secures it.
If it would have been called INT by Stingley to begin with I don’t thing they overturn it but they could overturn the call that was made on the field because it was obvious that he never had possession.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:14 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
Talking about this angle? IDK man it looked like the momentum was carrying the ball on Johnson’s body and his elbow was also wedged beneath it.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:16 pm to jimbeam
quote:
It touched before then. Other camera angle from the field side caught it.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:17 pm to jyoung1
IF you watch the video the nose of the ball clearly hits the ground, with no one controlling it by that point, cant use the ground in any way to catch a pass if nobody had possession of it first
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:18 pm to jyoung1
His body is not waifer thin.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News