Started By
Message

re: Top 10 List of players that have to be retained this offseason

Posted on 12/14/20 at 8:13 am to
Posted by burreauxxx
Member since Dec 2019
2758 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 8:13 am to
Explain why you think Shanihan bolsters our OLine play next year

The concept of wanting most upperclassmen to return from LSUs historically worst team is not one I’ll buy into, especially if they have to be sold as starters to come back

We need Roy, Ricks, Ojulari, Guillory, Gilbert, Boutte, Max/TJ, Stingley, Gaye, TDP/Emery etc to come back and take the next step for us to be relevant in 2021, adding in the ‘21 freshmen with the hope it all really comes together in 2022 with Max/TJ as upperclassmen with experience. Then we can make a title run again. We are not making a title run next year with much of the same team that just lost more games than it won.

That’s just the way I see it. If you really believe we are ready to ball out next year with Shanihan and Deculus anchoring the line then I like your optimism, as misguided as I believe it to be.
Posted by RileyTime
Gulf Breeze, FL
Member since Oct 2008
6930 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 8:17 am to
LSU won Saturday because all the selfish and uninspired players either bitched or opted out.

What you saw was pure hustle, determination and will to win. Something the Stingleys, Gilberts, Marshalls, Baskerfields can learn from.

If you don’t want to play every snap like it’s 2019 again, be gone with you.
Posted by KTiger85
Member since Oct 2018
666 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 8:51 am to
Dude, take a break. Your posts in this thread are terrible! Give it a rest and come back another day.
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
11979 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 8:58 am to
quote:

I’d add QB. Whichever of the three that will consider transferring after the season.




That won't be determined until after Spring Practice.
Remember when Burrow won the job, then two QBs left.
Posted by wilceaux
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2004
12405 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Kind of counterintuitive to bring back low-ceiling players that led you to a 4-6 record if you want to get back to being a title contender

The truth is they’re not coming back unless theyre starting obviously, so in some areas you’re just limiting your team.

Do you want to see Shanihan’s shite get pushed in at the point of attack for another year and immediately causing road blocks for our RBs? I don’t.

It’s seems like this desire to re-recruit average players is born out of our numbers issues, rather than trying to really improve the team’s performance.

Screw Logan, I’m ready to see Roy and the youth take over at DT and a lot of other areas where we’ve had average play at best



This is the dumbest shite I've ever read.
Posted by burreauxxx
Member since Dec 2019
2758 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 9:16 am to
Great explanation



Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
11979 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Great explanation


The OL players in 18 was about the same as 19, what happened? They were superior in 19.
If the OL 2020 comes back intact it's reasonable there will be some improvement in strength as well as team cohesion.
If a Freshman/Sophomore outperforms a veteran player and becomes a starter then it's even better.
Posted by smoke225
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2007
7868 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 10:01 am to
Geezus man you are embarrassing yourself, your football IQ is in the mentally retarded range.

Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
11293 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 10:37 am to
this motherfricker sucks
Posted by burreauxxx
Member since Dec 2019
2758 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 11:17 am to
quote:

The OL players in 18 was about the same as 19, what happened? They were superior in 19.


5 first-round picks at skill positions - including the greatest QB ever at LSU or maybe anywhere - made them look better than they were

If you can bring back Joe, Clyde, Jets, Chase and Marshall then I will be fine with Deculus whiffing on blocks once every 3 snaps

Posted by SupermanSlim
Member since Jan 2018
698 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 11:32 am to
Seniors who return next year won’t count toward LSU’s 81 scholarship positions. So it would to keep all seniors who want to come back. Austin Deculus and ZVR should be on that list as well.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9357 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 11:46 am to
quote:

5 first-round picks at skill positions - including the greatest QB ever at LSU or maybe anywhere - made them look better than they were

Damien Lewis and Lloyd Cushenberry are both NFL starters.

Charles became a starter before he got injured.

By your logic, we would have been better off without 3 NFL starters (so far) on our OL last year, because the OL didn’t play well in 2018.

You’re fixated on Shanahan, but your entire stance (that upperclassmen from a bad team won’t help) implies that Ingram, Logan, Farrell, Gaye, Stevens, and Anthony also wouldn’t make our team more successful next year. It’s ridiculous.

If we lose Ingram, Deculus, Rosenthal, and Shanahan and you think that makes the OL better, I don’t know what to tell you other than you’re wrong.
Posted by burreauxxx
Member since Dec 2019
2758 posts
Posted on 12/14/20 at 12:48 pm to
I never said the OLine was trash in 2019, I simply said our skill and scheme made them look better than they were.

And we're not talking about Cush, Lewis or Charles, we're talking about the leftovers and an Ivy League transfer that produced the weakest link in our offense this season

I saw bright spots in the OLine play in 2018 aside from the Bama game. We pushed UGA around at home and went on to win 10 games with a decent rushing attack

And no, I have said players with true upside (like Gaye who is physically capable but raw having come from the JUCO ranks) were worth re-recruiting. I don't even mind rotational players coming back because you need those along the DLine, but I think you're probably going to have to make promises to guys like Logan and that's the part I don't like. I'd rather up-and-comers like Roy starting than older limited players like Logan.

Biggest concern is Oline since we were so bad this year. Ingram was the only bright spot but he's gone IMO. So we're talking about bringing back 2 liabilities at Center and Right Tackle and probably giving them assurances to do so despite both being physically limited players. I'm not a fan of that idea

Yes, I think Wire is already better than Deculus and we can't get worse at Center unless we can't teach someone to snap a ball which literally every other school can do so why not us?
Posted by buckRogers
Nashville, TN
Member since Dec 2014
1835 posts
Posted on 12/24/20 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

burreauxxx


This is, collectively, the worst set of takes I’ve ever seen confined to a single thread. Merry Christmas to you sir.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram