- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
thoughts on Murphys fumble
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:19 pm
Should Les have challenged the ruling on Murphy's fumble in the 2nd quarter? It looked closure than the one Butch challenged and lost in the first quarter.
3
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:20 pm to landmanner
I think the real question is should Murphy touch the field in any meaningful situation? And we got our answer last night.
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:21 pm to danman6336
I thought all plays were reviewed?
Coaches don't challenge....or am I incorrect here?
Coaches don't challenge....or am I incorrect here?
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:21 pm to landmanner
Actually, it wasn't a fumble. It was caused by the ground on the replay. I guess they thought the game was inhand. Thats what we have as a coaching staff. No killer instinct!!!
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:25 pm to CamdenTiger
bullshite...it was a clear fumble. moron
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:28 pm to DunbartonTiger
quote:
bullshite...it was a clear fumble. moron
From what i saw....he fumbled when his arm hit the ground.
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:29 pm to lsusteve1
quote:
From what i saw....he fumbled when his arm hit the ground.
I saw that as well..
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:30 pm to Codythetiger
Ground forced the fumble, I thought it would get challenged and overturned. I was ticked when there wasn't a review.
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:31 pm to DunbartonTiger
quote:
bullshite...it was a clear fumble. moron
It was clearly not a fumble.
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:32 pm to DunbartonTiger
quote:
bullshite...it was a clear fumble. moron
No it wasn't.
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:34 pm to danman6336
quote:
I think the real question is should Murphy touch the field in any meaningful situation? And we got our answer last night.
Let's try using him in the slot as a receiver, as a back up slot back. Maybe he can do something in space. He cannot run inside. He goes down like a sack of potatoes.
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:38 pm to ottothewise
He had one carry I think last night. Sort of a small sample space to be looking at
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:38 pm to ottothewise
I hate Ridley getting that many touches. What did he do last night besides fumble? I thought Murphy deserved a lot more touches than the converted FB who can't hold the ball. Murphy didn't even truely fumble. It was a bad call.
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:39 pm to lsutigertalk
I think it was a fumble.
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:41 pm to CamdenTiger
I agree CT - his forearm and elbow hit jarring the ball loose. It was a very poor decision not
forcing the challenge review. At the very least, Chavous could have gathered the D to fire somebody up during the down time.
I can't understand the hostility toward Murphy, Dan. If you guys will recall, he lit up the spring game two yrs ago. I hope he gets on the field and, after Ridley's late game fumble when circumstances dictated that the ball had to be taken care of, I hope this coaching staff will give Richard the opprtunity to carry the rock.
forcing the challenge review. At the very least, Chavous could have gathered the D to fire somebody up during the down time.
I can't understand the hostility toward Murphy, Dan. If you guys will recall, he lit up the spring game two yrs ago. I hope he gets on the field and, after Ridley's late game fumble when circumstances dictated that the ball had to be taken care of, I hope this coaching staff will give Richard the opprtunity to carry the rock.
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:42 pm to DunbartonTiger
it looked as though the ground caused it from what I could teld, and I replayed it about 5 times... it was at the very least worthy of a challenge
Posted on 9/5/10 at 5:43 pm to landmanner
i thought the ground caused the fumlbe, it's the replay booths job to review the play. they did it when ridley fumbled on the unc 12 yrd line. i was wondering why they didn't do the same thing last night.
Posted on 9/5/10 at 6:02 pm to DunbartonTiger
quote:
bullshite...it was a clear fumble. moron
Fail ... it was at least close enough to justify a review. I was pissed when Miles didn't call a timeout to challenge.
Posted on 9/5/10 at 6:13 pm to DunbartonTiger
---bullshite...it was a clear fumble. moron---
I love it when people like Dunbarton Tiger put a lot of thought into their responses.
I love it when people like Dunbarton Tiger put a lot of thought into their responses.
Posted on 9/5/10 at 6:14 pm to 1984Tiger
i was screaming for him to replay it. and for those who say he succked. he ran the ball twice. thats nowhere near enough carries to say he nneds to sit out. now i say ford and murphy should split the carries and ridley to be the third down back
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News