- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The replay process in college football has to be streamlined
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:14 pm
It takes entirely too long for the on field ref to get notified of the need for replay and then go to the sideline tv and personally review the play. All reviews should take place by an official in the press box that begins the review process immediately after a controversial call. The LSU game this weekend was so long partially bc of the long replays. Something needs to change.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:18 pm to StatMaster
Birmingham needs to speed it up
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:18 pm to StatMaster
NFL is better. The opposing coach decides if it's important and has to be right.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:26 pm to StatMaster
The review monitor needed to be on a Segway because that Ref could run to well.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:36 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
Birmingham needs to speed it up
East Tuscaloosa needs to stay out of it. This will only further benefit the gumps.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:36 pm to Bestbank Tiger
You are right but college officials are terrible compared to the NFL ones. They make way more mistakes hence the need for more replays. However, something needs to be done. Maybe give each coach 2 challenges a quarter and it doesn’t affect timeouts or something. Booth review under 2 minutes.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:39 pm to StatMaster
Did anyone ever comment on the Anderson catch they overturned. No replay was shown in the stadium.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:42 pm to StatMaster
quote:
the review process immediately after a controversial call. The LSU game this weekend was so long partially bc of the long replays.
the head ref running like a crippled kid added to the time fram
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:43 pm to mhc4tigers
quote:
Did anyone ever comment on the Anderson catch they overturned. No replay was shown in the stadium.
i’ll agree with what announcers said.
i don’t think he caught it, but there really wasn’t enough evidence to overturn it either.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:44 pm to StatMaster
Not my idea but I love it:
There should be a “play clock” on the replay. If it takes longer than say :40 to determine if it’s a miss then it’s not indisputable evidence. Move along
There should be a “play clock” on the replay. If it takes longer than say :40 to determine if it’s a miss then it’s not indisputable evidence. Move along
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:47 pm to Quatre Pot
quote:
There should be a “play clock” on the replay. If it takes longer than say :40 to determine if it’s a miss then it’s not indisputable evidence. Move along
Watch this board melt to shambles if LSU were ever on the wrong end of a call that didn’t get overturned in time
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:49 pm to Quatre Pot
Exactly. If it's indisputable, it shouldn't take long to review.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 8:55 pm to Epaminondas
quote:
If it's indisputable, it shouldn't take long to review.
exactly.
the only thing that should extend the time is making sure you get the clock right, or an exact spot on field for like a fumble, etc.
Back to top
