Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

The causes of lane’s big games issues imo.

Posted on 11/10/26 at 8:26 am
Posted by Cd104
Member since Aug 2018
2885 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 8:26 am
Lane’s big game struggles in year 1 haven’t simply been because of the result but his coaching decisions. Baker took a lot of heat for the ole miss first half gameplan but according to LSU insiders like shea Dixon, lane was heavily involved in the game planning vs chambliss due to his history with him. He felt going soft and not giving up the big play was the best approach vs his former QB. After that gamrplsn got torched baker did things his way in half 2 leading to the defense surrendering only 8 points. Looking at how GA and Texas suffocated Chambliss by blitzing him relentlessly it makes it more baffling Kiffin felt the soft approach was the best course of action.


Then vs bama, he coached thst game like he had no confidence the defense would make stops. He didn’t adjust to the flow of the game when it’s clear that first half points would be at a premium and that the defense was holding their own. 10-9 should’ve been the score at halftime if he managed the game properly. Coaching impulsively, not adjusting to the flow of the game and meddling in defensive gameplans have resulted in disappointing results in our biggest games under Kiffin so far.
This post was edited on 11/10/26 at 8:37 am
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
12721 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 8:49 am to
He is objectively a bad gameday decision maker. I have never seen a coach have a better ability to win the stat sheet and lose the game. The good news is that being a bad gameday coach doesn't mean we won't ever win. He seems to be good at everything else. roster building, team building, coaching hire decisions, gameplanning, etc. And we saw with CLM and CEO that questionable gameday guys can still win with good enough rosters. He just has no feel for in game decisions.
This post was edited on 11/10/26 at 8:51 am
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
30066 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 8:54 am to
Lane has forgotten the ONE BIG LESSON from his old boss Al Davis: JUST WIN, BABY!!!!

He wants to win, but he wants to do it by making a big splash. He tries too hard to make decisions that will make him look like a genius IF they work out.

Against good competition, they rarely do, so he just looks like a contrarian for no reason. Had Lane made sound football decisions, especially in the first half, then the outcome may very well have been different.

He's the George Costanza of college football - all of his instincts are wrong.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
48178 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:05 am to
Lane should learn to STFU and get a couple bullying seasons under his belt with at least 1 NC before he brings all the celebs and cookie on the sidelines and dunking shite into TS...

If he really wants to be what he can be with this program, he'll ditch all that for a bit, turn down the DJ music and use his influence to get Mike the Tiger back on the sidelines....
Posted by xGeauxLSUx
United States of Atrophy
Member since Oct 2008
23189 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:22 am to
quote:

lane was heavily involved in the game planning vs chambliss due to his history with him. He felt going soft and not giving up the big play was the best approach vs his former QB.

How ironic. That's what Bama did to Leavitt.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
34630 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:27 am to
quote:


He is objectively a bad gameday decision maker. I have never seen a coach have a better ability to win the stat sheet and lose the game. The good news is that being a bad gameday coach doesn't mean we won't ever win. He seems to be good at everything else. roster building, team building, coaching hire decisions, gameplanning, etc. And we saw with CLM and CEO that questionable gameday guys can still win with good enough rosters. He just has no feel for in game decisions
most coaches are. Nick Saban was pretty bad at times too. Most great coaches win the games before they start with all the prep work.

You tend to see these bad decisions when the coaches feel like they have to make them to win because the team isn't just better than the other team.
Posted by Liquidbizket
Member since Nov 2026
18 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:30 am to
It’s still year 1. CLK has been on campus what, 6 months? It’s all a learning experience. We are in such better shape than we were with CBK.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
63588 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Baker took a lot of heat for the ole miss first half gameplan but according to LSU insiders like shea Dixon, lane was heavily involved in the game planning vs chambliss due to his history with him.


As he should have been.

quote:

He felt going soft and not giving up the big play was the best approach vs his former QB.


It wasn’t just about Chambliss. Lane talked about the crowd too. And he knows the Ole Miss fan base and what the energy is like in that stadium, its ebbs and flows. He thought that taking away the big plays would keep the crowd from being a huge factor in the 1st half, then felt confident that our offense could score and would eventually take a 2 score lead in the 2nd half and take the crowd completely out of it.

He probably overthought it a bit. And wasn’t expecting Green to get hurt. He probably thought we would be able to ride Jones and Trey’Dez in the 4th and pull away. He also wasn’t expecting Spears to get hurt. That injury was absolutely brutal for that particular game. (Was brutal for the Bama game, too). It was certainly on the coaches to not be prepared for that. Jimcoily was absolutely abused until they finally figured out to go more nickel/dime with Jackson on the outside and sliding PJ down to the slot.

quote:

Looking at how GA and Texas suffocated Chambliss by blitzing him relentlessly it makes it more baffling Kiffin felt the soft approach was the best course of action.


And look at how that strategy worked against Russell. EVERYBODY before the game was saying “Blitz every down!!!! Russel will wilt under the pressure of Tiger Stadium!!!!!” Then completely changed their tune after we lost. We brought a ton of pressure all game, just couldn’t get home. There is not one way to completely shut down a dual threat QB. You have to pick your poison and take some chances. Sometimes the other guys just make plays.

***Few people are talking about this, but our DTs have been neutralized lately—Anderson going down hurt bigly—and it is affecting the entire defense. That position was already thin, and we are asking too much of a true freshman who has to be hitting a wall playing in his 1st grueling SEC schedule going up against guys that are 3 or 4 years older than him. And he doesn’t have a threat next to him, so he’s getting double teamed on passing downs. And is already undersized for stopping the run.

quote:

Coaching impulsively, not adjusting to the flow of the game


This is fair, and I’ve pointed it out a few times. He’s still learning how to coach “at LSU.” It’s different than any place he’s ever been. And he’s trying to find the right balance. I think he’ll figure it out. Just probably gonna be too late for this year to make a playoff run.

quote:

meddling in defensive gameplans


This is silly. Lane Kiffin is the head coach. He gets paid $11.5 million/per. He knows football on both sides. The wind and losses go on HIS record. He has every right—and responsibility—to be a part of defensive game planning. He’s not on the head set in overriding Baker and calling plays. He may tell him, “let’s go a little conservative here, make them drive the length of the field” or “get aggressive here, we need the ball back asap.” Or whatever. Which, again, is part of his job. No good coach gives a coordinator complete, 100% autonomy. They work together, not completely separate of each other.
Posted by T1gerNate
Member since Feb 2020
5119 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Coaching impulsively, not adjusting to the flow of the game and meddling in defensive gameplans have resulted in disappointing results in our biggest games under Kiffin so far.


This
Posted by saturncube21
Member since Nov 2015
12432 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:47 am to
In Bama game, Kiffin showed no faith in the defense
Posted by Lcguy
Member since Jan 2020
2422 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:03 am to
Agreed on Miles and Ed 0. They were just great recruiters, had better players and that would mask their decisions. Lane will recruit very well and Lsu will do well.
Posted by TroyTider
Florida Panhandle
Member since Oct 2009
4077 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:19 am to
quote:

He's the George Costanza of college football - all of his instincts are wrong.


If that is the case, then like George Costanza, CLK simply needs to abstain.

LINK
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
34630 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:30 am to
quote:


In Bama game, Kiffin showed no faith in the defense
and when the offense finally got the lead, it took one offensive play for Bama to show you why.
Posted by entmd2002
Lufkin, TX
Member since Dec 2010
485 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:44 am to
Laney doesn't want the game to be close. I get that but sometimes she just have to hang around and we did that through the first 3/4 of the game. Bama played zone in the backend almost all game until we got to the red zone. The field got squished, which made it harder to throw and they also threw in some cover zero with man in the red zone which proved to be effective. If only Levitt wouldn't have had those two passes blocked. On third down in three late in the game with Dylan Jones taking the direct snap, everyone in the stadium knew what the call was gonna be and I'm sure Alabama did too, and he was stuffed.

I would love to see what our offensive points per red zone attempt was, and I would love to see what our defensive points per opponents Redzone attempt was. Would be an interesting stat.
Posted by GeauxTigers6447
Member since Nov 2014
205 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:58 am to
The cause of Lane's big game issue's is we are playing teams with more talent, who have played together longer. We were a 6-6 team that brought in 40-50 new players and new coaches. We will improve to a 7-6 or 8-4 team this year and make big strides next year. There is no magic dust to make a 6-6 team a national title contender in one year. It takes hard work and a little time. Even the great Joe B needed a year to grow.

Geaux Tigers
Posted by Jack Crevalle
USVI
Member since Aug 2018
9486 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 11:02 am to
quote:

The cause of Lane's big game issue's is we are playing teams with more talent

Kentucky does not have as much talent as LSU.
Posted by NewportTiger
Newport Beach, CA
Member since Dec 2019
534 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 11:02 am to
One of the funniest sentences in TRant history:

"He's the George Costanza of college football - all of his instincts are wrong."
Posted by Cd104
Member since Aug 2018
2885 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 11:13 am to
quote:

we are playing teams with more talent


Kentucky absolutely doesn’t have more talent than us cmon
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram