- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The argument over whether to pull for Bama or ND is silly
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:20 am
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:20 am
Bama is going to crush ND anyway so it's pointless
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:21 am to Powerman
Yeah, I'm pulling for Notre Dame but, like I was telling people yesterday, it's kinda like pulling for Wile E. Coyote.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:24 am to Powerman
I agree. Bama should destroy the Irish. I'll be pulling for ND just the same. Having had a sister attend ND we still have some ties to South Bend. Plus there is no way I could ever pull for Alabama.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:25 am to wilfont
Don't get me wrong, if ND pulls off the upset I won't complain
But this is the biggest mismatch since 2001 Miami vs Nebraska
But this is the biggest mismatch since 2001 Miami vs Nebraska
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:28 am to Powerman
Why exactly should Alabama "destroy" Notre Dame
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:30 am to MrWiseGuy
quote:
Why exactly should Alabama "destroy" Notre Dame
It's just not a good matchup
ND has a good defense but they haven't seen an offensive line like Bama's
Bama's line is just that good this year. They can run for 200 yards on anyone. There isn't a front 7 in football that matches up with them.
ND won't be able to hold them to under 28 and it's doubtful that they'll be able to score that much
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:30 am to Powerman
2001 should've been Tennessee versus Miami.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:31 am to Powerman
quote:Did they run for 200 on us?
They can run for 200 yards on anyone.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:31 am to MrWiseGuy
quote:
Why exactly should Alabama "destroy" Notre Dame
if you were going to design an offense for bama's D to tee off on, it's notre dame's offense

Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:33 am to Powerman
quote:
ND has a good defense but they haven't seen an offensive line like Bama's
What's so great about Bama's offense other than the running game? Which plays into ND's strength in their front 7....
I don't get this whole "Bama is going to trash ND" thought process.
Bama showed yesterday that they're pretty one dimensional. They have ONE WR. ONE. Take out Williams as a safety valve and put pressure on McCarron and he struggles.
BAMA ran for over 300 yards on the ground yesterday and still had to fight to win the game. Something doesn't add up there. BAMA is lucky that UGA's run D suuuucks. Notre Dame's doesn't.
ND matches up well, and IMO, add the SEC bias up with the hatred of ND because of the media (like the media doesn't love BAMA either

Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:43 am to Powerman
I don't see Bama crushing Notre Dame. They might win but it is not a guarantee. When Bama has faced good defenses they have barely won; Georgia and LSU. When they faced a running quarterback, good offense and a decent defense they lost; TAMU.
Notre Dame has a very good defense and were pretty good against Stanford's run game. They held them to 147 rushing and 272 total yards.
Notre Dame has a running quarterback and I think he'll give Bama trouble. This Alabama defense is NOT the defense of a year ago and has shown it is suseptible to both run and pass. We ran for 139 and passed for 296. We're not an offensive juggernaut.
Go Irish! (at least this game)

Notre Dame has a very good defense and were pretty good against Stanford's run game. They held them to 147 rushing and 272 total yards.
Notre Dame has a running quarterback and I think he'll give Bama trouble. This Alabama defense is NOT the defense of a year ago and has shown it is suseptible to both run and pass. We ran for 139 and passed for 296. We're not an offensive juggernaut.
Go Irish! (at least this game)


Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
if you were going to design an offense for bama's D to tee off on, it's notre dame's offense
Disagree.
Is Notre Dame going to put up 450 yards? No.
But they will move the ball effectively and have the players to create mismatches and the ability to run the ball to keep the Bama defense honest.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:47 am to MrWiseGuy
Manteo disagrees. Says they gonna crush bamas arse
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:49 am to Powerman
I think ND has a chance. Bama played a soft schedule too.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 11:14 am to Powerman
quote:
The argument over whether to pull for Bama or ND is silly
It's silly because you should just pull for whomever you want. Neither outcome affects LSU an iota.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 11:15 am to MrWiseGuy
ND not seen speed on D like SEC/Bama when play BC, Navy, and the like. Please don't say USCw, is laughable.The line will open ND-10 i'm sure!
Posted on 12/2/12 at 11:17 am to Penrod
quote:
Penrod
quote:
Neither outcome affects LSU an iota.
correction, the outcome affects LSU a lot. Recruiting is a lot easier when you come calling fresh off a NC win. You guys need to start realizing this.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 11:18 am to Powerman
quote:
Bama is going to crush ND anyway so it's pointless
Not so fast, my friend. Bama isn't that good - they went 2-1 against the only good teams they played, and they needing coaching blunders to eke out those two wins. Brian Kelly is a solid coach unlikely to make the mistakes that Richt amd Miles made handing those games to Bama. I think ND has a good shot at beating the Gumps.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 11:27 am to Powerman
It probably is silly, but from the perspective of an LSU fan and maybe other fans, it represents two systems and traditions of athletics that LSU will emulate in the future.
Alabama is a football factory, this is their history. There is little of renown in any other aspect of Alabama as a institution or university. Alabama fans can enlighten me, as to why I am wrong.
Notre Dame has tried to maintain something more then just football throughout its history, although I'm not so naive to understand that they have not done some sinister things to win games, recruit, etc.
So what about LSU, sometimes I am afraid LSU will become Alabama, a school whose identity is based solely around athletics, and not the traditions and academics that are unique to it.
Therefore I prefer LSU have more in common with Notre Dame with some ethic, spirit, and soul as opposed to the philistine Alabama.
Alabama is a football factory, this is their history. There is little of renown in any other aspect of Alabama as a institution or university. Alabama fans can enlighten me, as to why I am wrong.
Notre Dame has tried to maintain something more then just football throughout its history, although I'm not so naive to understand that they have not done some sinister things to win games, recruit, etc.
So what about LSU, sometimes I am afraid LSU will become Alabama, a school whose identity is based solely around athletics, and not the traditions and academics that are unique to it.
Therefore I prefer LSU have more in common with Notre Dame with some ethic, spirit, and soul as opposed to the philistine Alabama.
Popular
Back to top
