Started By
Message

re: Steele's defense: the numbers

Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:01 pm to
Posted by TchPowDog
Zachary, LA
Member since Sep 2015
4798 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:01 pm to
I believe our points per game allowed is high because of busted coverages in the secondary. We had blown coverages and miscues EVERY game this year, except for maybe A&M. Other than that, we kept every opponent contained (for the most part).
Posted by hbuc88
San Antonio
Member since Dec 2009
1174 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:05 pm to
Only idiots put all of the blame on Steele. It was his first year and the DBs had to learn a new system. A DB can always get beat. What we saw last night was great and with experience, the D should be better.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164635 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Points per game could be in part to the offense and SPECIAL TEAMS!

The offense had barely any turnovers the first 7 games.

Special teams coverage was poor but that meant teams were starting around the 30. Teams weren't starting in plus territory. Teams drove the field on LSU and the defense usually helped them with busts.

LSU gave up way too many points this season which is an undeniable fact.
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
83548 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

total defense: #8


We were 8th in total defense last year


Unless he is saying total combined yards, which is bullshite because LSU played less games. You have to go by game average.


And last year, we were 3rd in the country in average points given up per game. This year, we are 44th. That's unacceptable
This post was edited on 12/30/15 at 1:13 pm
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164635 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Only idiots put all of the blame on Steele. It was his first year and the DBs had to learn a new system. A DB can always get beat. What we saw last night was great and with experience, the D should be better.

The first year reason for busts is such a poor excuse. The defense was solid and in position all season long in 2009 - Chavis' first season.
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:09 pm to
And? They didn't exactly shut them down except maybe you could argue they did WKU. Last night for that QB to even play like he did was amazing considering LSU had somewhere around 20 QB pressures in the third quarter.

Dak Prescott SHREDDED the LSU defense in the second half. Last night was probably their best defensive effort on the season. That's about the only positive I take from Steele this year as DC because nothing improved from last year except defensive line and that's clearly O doing that. The defense was getting worse from game 1 all the way to the 3 game skid. The positive there is they improved against a bad TAMU team and a very good TT offense.

No team scored under 19 points on LSU. That's the only stat that matters -- scoring defense. If at any point in the season LSU's offense struggled you could bet your arse you couldn't rely on this defense to win the game for them.
This post was edited on 12/30/15 at 1:15 pm
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12137 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

I believe our points per game allowed is high because of busted coverages in the secondary.


Special teams. It's easier to score when you have to drive the ball 60 yards instead of 80.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164635 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:14 pm to
LSU is 27th in total defense. People may think that seems good. To put that in perspective the 2008 defense everyone thinks is the worst of all time was 32nd. Not very far away.
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:16 pm to
Malveto defense also didn't give 20+ points up 9 straight games either. Not to mention in those 9 games SEVERAL QBs were like 3-4th string QBs.

They keep Steele Miles will be out the door next year unless we see some amazing progression at QB in which case the offense will need to carry the team like they did in Mett's last season. You're going to see some really bad LB play next year unless by some miracle Beckwith stays.
This post was edited on 12/30/15 at 1:18 pm
Posted by TchPowDog
Zachary, LA
Member since Sep 2015
4798 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Special teams. It's easier to score when you have to drive the ball 60 yards instead of 80.

Special Teams certainly didn't help and I think SBD is a fricking moron, but I think if you add up our points allowed on blown coverage/busted plays/miscues, you'll be surprised at the percentage.
Posted by Andre
Cashier at Stein's Deli
Member since Apr 2009
4301 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

We played 3 of the nation's top 10 QB's this year. FWIW CFBstats

Link added for proof that I didn't make up the stats.



Also played

67 - e mich
89 - s carolina
100 - florida
N/A - syracuse
N/A - jeremy johnson, auburn
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:19 pm to
For reference: the 2013 defense, which was pretty bad, finished 15th in yards/game and 21st in ppg

2014, which also struggled, finished 3rd nationally

Football Outsiders Defensive FEI, which adjust for plays, drives, opponents, etc, has us at #39 going into the TT game
This post was edited on 12/30/15 at 1:22 pm
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84069 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

total defense: #8



cfb stats says we are 27th.
This post was edited on 12/30/15 at 1:21 pm
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37142 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:21 pm to
Weren't we one of the worst red zone defenses in the country?
Posted by TchPowDog
Zachary, LA
Member since Sep 2015
4798 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Weren't we one of the worst red zone defenses in the country?

Opponents redzone success was 86% (31 of 36)

That's terrible..
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:26 pm to
Those numbers are not right and you should feel bad for posting them as if they were.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84069 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Opponents redzone success was 86% (31 of 36)

That's terrible..


frick.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48699 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:30 pm to
How can anybody seriously say that you can judge a DC after only ONE single season?

I don't think it's possible. Many are ready to run Steele out of town based on one season.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:31 pm to
30th in yards per play at 5 per
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84069 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 1:33 pm to
I agree. I can't judge Steele too harshly, especially since the consensus on this board is that our defense is depleted and Chavis left it in ruins (or something like that).

I didn't like the Steele hire, but the guy is here now and deserves his chance to do what he wants to do.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram