1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So is this just the SEC is laying the framework to kick us out if we roster the players?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:58 pm to sheek
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:58 pm to sheek
Slow will say this is wrong and all legal opinions are wrong but his....even though he does local criminal law
and ftr I like slow...but he is being extremely dense on this one
and ftr I like slow...but he is being extremely dense on this one
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:54 pm to lsu777
quote:
Slow will say this is wrong and all legal opinions are wrong but his....even though he does local criminal law
Equal protection will be tricky to argue since it will be hard to establish a state actor. I am no attorney, so this is where I limit out on my legal knowledge.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
Thoughts?
quote:
Ross Dellinger is telling you the root cause issue here if you read between the lines.
A) The SEC is basically acknowledging that the Protect College Sports Act has little to no chance of passing.
Therefore,
B) The SEC is trying to insert control in a potential self governance model moving forward because the NCAA is powerless unless it gets protection from the PCSA.
But really,
C) This is the last ditch effort to protect the cash cow. The only way the SEC can continue to enrich themselves is by refusing to acknowledge the players as professionals which avoids collective bargaining.
Lastly,
D) Lane Kiffin and LSU are throwing a wrench into the already broken machine because he doesn’t care about the unjust enrichment the NCAA, SEC, and schools are profiting. Lane only cares about winning football games and because of that the SEC knows he is on the verge of toppling the already vulnerable system.
That is real reason the SEC is throwing everything at LSU hoping something will stick. The whole business is about to collapse and they know it.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
I don't think they would either but they already amended their entrance one time before with Nebraska who didn't meet as an AAU member. LSU is a much bigger brand than Nebraska that gives B10 a foothold into the SEC market. 6th overall in national ratings, 2nd in average ratings in the SEC the past 2 decades. Plus a kneecap to SEC. There's many reasons to make exceptions here. $$$.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:08 pm to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
to ask why the need for today’s additional filing even though they were never rostered .
They're asking for the power to enforce the rules for those who break them. If LSU hasn't rostered the players, I don't think they've broken the rules.
quote:
Also, do you agree with the SEC’s filing that Lane’s comment is indicative of “lack of institutional control”?
No, but they're clearly saying "we can play this game in the media, too" and that plan is working (see: USA today article)
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:08 pm to AkronTiger
I can't figure out what we actually did to deserved this threat. Maybe it is groundwork if we roster any of those players that signed an NFL contract of any kind, but I am 100% sure LSU is not going to do that, so where's the issue?
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News