- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/8/11 at 1:02 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
evidently, neither is sarcasm...
Gotcha
Posted on 11/8/11 at 1:02 pm to GRTiger
Yeah. He was clearly out of bounds. He must've thought he had more room because he could have run another 1/2 yard inside and it would have been TD.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 1:17 pm to ForeLSU
another wrinkle is that many of our short side options in the past have been run from the pistol/shotgun. Before this game, we never ran it much with jj under center. To me, the angles are much better with the qb under center.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 2:30 pm to lctiger
To me, it makes me wonder if JJ taking that big, looping angle isn't by design.
We're inviting the uncovered defender to read the quarterback, but also tempting him by having Jordan stay relatively deep in the backfield as he runs laterally.
Typically, the complaint there with him being so deep is that you want to initiate that uncovered or unblocked player making that read and comitting by "pressing the line" or pushing towards the line of scrimmage, which JJ really does not.
Instead, the invites the kid into the backfield, and Ford stays deep enough that it allows Hilliard time to identify the edge guy and get a hat on him.
Seems counterintuitive almost, but it works in this instance.
I also really think we ran this after seeing how 'Bama would read the keys when we ran it earlier in the game. Don't discount what Brown brings up in terms of us rearranging the blocking assignments once we saw how Bama was going to defend that play.
My point-quite literally-is that our offensive coaching staff completely rooked and outcoached the Alabama defensive staff by showing this look to them early and allowing them to stop it. Just so we could see how they matched up.
We're inviting the uncovered defender to read the quarterback, but also tempting him by having Jordan stay relatively deep in the backfield as he runs laterally.
Typically, the complaint there with him being so deep is that you want to initiate that uncovered or unblocked player making that read and comitting by "pressing the line" or pushing towards the line of scrimmage, which JJ really does not.
Instead, the invites the kid into the backfield, and Ford stays deep enough that it allows Hilliard time to identify the edge guy and get a hat on him.
Seems counterintuitive almost, but it works in this instance.
I also really think we ran this after seeing how 'Bama would read the keys when we ran it earlier in the game. Don't discount what Brown brings up in terms of us rearranging the blocking assignments once we saw how Bama was going to defend that play.
My point-quite literally-is that our offensive coaching staff completely rooked and outcoached the Alabama defensive staff by showing this look to them early and allowing them to stop it. Just so we could see how they matched up.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 2:34 pm to GFunk
quote:Have wondered enough to almost start a thread on it.
it makes me wonder if JJ taking that big, looping angle isn't by design
Posted on 11/8/11 at 2:40 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
That play call took balls
yeah JJ barely got that ball off.. bad things could have easily happened
Posted on 11/8/11 at 2:43 pm to Tiger JJ
quote:
Didn't realize Hilliard had been the FB on that play.
I touched on this the other day when somebody mentioned that they didn't wanna see Hilliard run that FB dive because it got no yards consistently. yeah, it might not always get yards, but I think the defense keys on him when he's in the game and it may make the LBs focus on stopping him on an inside run when we're going outside (as was the case here, and also on another run where we faked to him and flipped the ball to the TB).
Posted on 11/8/11 at 2:44 pm to GFunk
Chris Faulk is a fricking man. 
Posted on 11/8/11 at 3:13 pm to GFunk
interesting
I like seeing it broken down like that, and when you have a block by the fullback, TWO guys out of the play, courtesy Faulk, and no penetration, you're hoping the guy, by some miracle, accidentally steps out of bounds!
I have a new respect for the option. I was always one who felt if the defense plays technique, the option is of no effect... au contraire, when you lay it out with the overloaded wide side, that makes the short side option a much smarter move, provided it is properly coached.
I like seeing it broken down like that, and when you have a block by the fullback, TWO guys out of the play, courtesy Faulk, and no penetration, you're hoping the guy, by some miracle, accidentally steps out of bounds!
I have a new respect for the option. I was always one who felt if the defense plays technique, the option is of no effect... au contraire, when you lay it out with the overloaded wide side, that makes the short side option a much smarter move, provided it is properly coached.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 3:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I'm not certain but I think all of the option plays run in regulation were to the wide side....
Posted on 11/8/11 at 3:32 pm to GFunk
This really is evidence if everyone just does there job a team succeeds. The LSU section I was in went absolutely insane when this happened.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 3:44 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
That play call took balls
How is that? The perimeter is the only place they were vulnerable all night.
It was nice to see that after the Crowton years of not being able to get a yard off of that play that the new OCs have taught JJ and the boys how to run it correctly.
This post was edited on 11/8/11 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 11/8/11 at 3:46 pm to Veritas vincit
quote:
JJ probably turns upfield with the ball (like he always does)
Didn't think about this until I read your post, but yea, JJ kept all year long. I've been criticizing him for hogging the ball. But in this game he pitched most of the time. Maybe they were setting bama up all this time.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 4:08 pm to GFunk
I don't know why so many people don't like the option, it can be very successfull and hard to defend.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 4:11 pm to GFunk
Some folks post that it doesn't matter on a running play who the QB is because one QB can hand off as well as another QB.
Some folks post that a QB running a play takes away a carry from a more talented running RB.
This play shows why a running QB makes a running attack better. With a QB who is a running threat, the defense has to account for the QB.
On this play, Jefferson completely takes the DE out of the play. Without the threat of Jefferson keeping the ball, that DE would have either neutralized Hilliard or tackled Ford. Either way, the play doesn't work without a QB who is a running threat.
Some folks post that a QB running a play takes away a carry from a more talented running RB.
This play shows why a running QB makes a running attack better. With a QB who is a running threat, the defense has to account for the QB.
On this play, Jefferson completely takes the DE out of the play. Without the threat of Jefferson keeping the ball, that DE would have either neutralized Hilliard or tackled Ford. Either way, the play doesn't work without a QB who is a running threat.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 4:25 pm to just me
I love lee, but it seems that jj has many more advantages then lee.
Back to top


0








