Started By
Message

re: Small plane crash in Gonzales, engine fell off

Posted on 10/13/26 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by VernonPLSUfan
Leesville, La.
Member since Sep 2007
18055 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 2:43 pm to
Didn’t have a tee time, marshalls doin work. Now did the engine fall off or did the plane fall off the engine?
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
19322 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Just a guess, but I would be looking for that other blade and how far away it was found from the rest of the wreckage.


Had an aviation case once that involved a similar issue. We searched and even put up a large reward for recovery of the piece. Never found it.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
58396 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Now did the engine fall off or did the plane fall off the engine?

A new take on the chicken/egg thing.
Posted by AutoYes_Clown
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2012
5391 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 3:09 pm to
Well I just went down a rabbit hole. It lools like plane is a 1982 Cessna 210 registration N1329U.

I wont post names, but N1329U is owned by a transportation company in Gonzalez whose owner has familiar last name. In 1989 a transportation company with the same name and last name owner had its owner indicted in 1989 for distribution of cocaine and used the company for cocaine sales. Part of the owners plea deal was to forfeit ....a 1976 Cessna 210.





Seriously though, glad pilot is ok. Im wondering if he tried impossible turn, stalled and bounced the plane cause engine to dislodge. The tracking data shows pretty tight turn.
Posted by Traveler
I'm not late-I'm early for tomorrow
Member since Sep 2003
26702 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 3:10 pm to
Judge, I remember reading about a tail rotor blade separating from the rest of the assembly over a swamp and I don’t think it was ever found either.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80948 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 3:11 pm to
Or dropped the engine then had to do an impossible turn because it was either that or ditch straight ahead
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
22230 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 3:16 pm to






Looks like the 175's are known for engine mount problems


https://www.regulations.gov/document/FAA-2016-5579-0001

quote:

We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2008-15-06, which applies to certain Textron Aviation Inc. Models 175 and 175A airplanes (type certificate previously held by Cessna Aircraft Company). AD 2008-15-06 currently requires checking the airplane logbook to determine if the original engine mounting brackets have been replaced. If the original engine mounting brackets are still installed, the AD requires repetitively inspecting those brackets for cracks and replacing any cracked engine mounting bracket until all four original engine mounting brackets are replaced. Replacing all four original engine mounting brackets terminates the actions required in AD 2008-15-06. Since we issued AD 2008-15-06, we have determined that the applicability needs to be changed to add a serial number and take one out. This proposed AD would retain the actions required in AD 2008-15-06 and would change the Applicability section. We are proposing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.


Service bulletin:

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2008/07/29/E8-16583/airworthiness-directives-cessna-aircraft-company-models-175-and-175a-airplanes




This post was edited on 10/13/26 at 3:35 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram