- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should the NCAA go to something like targeting 1 and targeting 2?
Posted on 10/25/18 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 10/25/18 at 6:54 pm
I say instead of a blanket targeting call they need to go to a targeting 1 and targeting 2. 1 would be a targeting call the refs deem unintentional and would be a 15 yard penalty. 2 would be targeting deemed intentional and would follow the current rules. What the rant say.
This post was edited on 10/25/18 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 10/25/18 at 6:59 pm to TheTexasTiger7
This is a brand new idea.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 6:59 pm to BamaHater
Holy shite this is a great novel idea
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:00 pm to BamaHater
No this was not targeting.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:00 pm to BamaHater
They can't decide what targeting is so deciding 1 or 2 would be just a sign bad. The whole targeting rule isn't BS anyways. Go play golf if you don't want to get hit.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:04 pm to BamaHater
They already make that type of distinction for running into the punter vs roughing the punter. There is definitely precedent for making a distinction on targeting fouls.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:08 pm to BamaHater
No matter what devin white wouldve got the worst punishment. Bama just out for him
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:09 pm to BamaHater
Yep I think that's the ticket.
Target 2 better be obvious as hell
Target 2 better be obvious as hell
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:13 pm to BamaHater
How about just not call targeting on people that don’t look like they are “targeting” someone’s head? Targeting should be very obvious. There should be no question as to whether it should be called. As it is written now, the rule is way too encompassing.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:13 pm to BamaHater
Yes. Just like a flagrant foul in basketball.
When you can eject and suspend a player for what White did, something needs to change.
When you can eject and suspend a player for what White did, something needs to change.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:19 pm to BamaHater
Nope.
The refs and/or replay officials will frick that up too.
Just make it a 15 yard penalty and only throw a player out of the game if he has two personal fouls.
The refs and/or replay officials will frick that up too.
Just make it a 15 yard penalty and only throw a player out of the game if he has two personal fouls.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:26 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
Well I guess as long as I have been on TD is should figured this has probably been posted multiple times.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:31 pm to BamaHater
I heard that suggested on Sirius XM Monday morning. I think it would be a much more effective system.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:31 pm to BamaHater
Nice steal from Hanigriff
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:48 pm to BamaHater
Ah, you were listening to Sirius College sports radio too huh?
I heard them suggest this the other day. It's a good idea.
I heard them suggest this the other day. It's a good idea.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:52 pm to BamaHater
Yes. One of the goals to the Free Devin whife campaign is to get a refresh on the rules. It’s soudns it was written by people that never played football. I like the two strikes and you are out deal.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:53 pm to BamaHater
quote:
targeting call the refs deem unintentional
How the frick does that work
This post was edited on 10/25/18 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 10/25/18 at 8:17 pm to braindeadboxer
quote:
How the frick does that work
Well the SEC refs would just deem every targeting 2 for us anyways
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News