Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Should the NCAA go to something like targeting 1 and targeting 2?

Posted on 10/25/18 at 6:54 pm
Posted by BamaHater
Houston
Member since Sep 2003
13536 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 6:54 pm
I say instead of a blanket targeting call they need to go to a targeting 1 and targeting 2. 1 would be a targeting call the refs deem unintentional and would be a 15 yard penalty. 2 would be targeting deemed intentional and would follow the current rules. What the rant say.
This post was edited on 10/25/18 at 6:55 pm
Posted by TheTexasTiger7
Dallas - Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2018
9387 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 6:55 pm to
Yes
Posted by dax9876
Member since Aug 2004
1210 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 6:59 pm to
This is a brand new idea.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 6:59 pm to
Holy shite this is a great novel idea
Posted by toratiger
susukino
Member since Aug 2008
2604 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:00 pm to
No this was not targeting.
Posted by Bayoufightingtiger
Member since Aug 2011
4608 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:00 pm to
They can't decide what targeting is so deciding 1 or 2 would be just a sign bad. The whole targeting rule isn't BS anyways. Go play golf if you don't want to get hit.
Posted by Garnertigah
Member since Jan 2014
128 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:04 pm to
They already make that type of distinction for running into the punter vs roughing the punter. There is definitely precedent for making a distinction on targeting fouls.
Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:07 pm to
Posted by FournetteForEver7
Member since Nov 2015
2296 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:08 pm to
No matter what devin white wouldve got the worst punishment. Bama just out for him
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:09 pm to
Yep I think that's the ticket.

Target 2 better be obvious as hell
Posted by StatMaster
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
4291 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:13 pm to
How about just not call targeting on people that don’t look like they are “targeting” someone’s head? Targeting should be very obvious. There should be no question as to whether it should be called. As it is written now, the rule is way too encompassing.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35273 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:13 pm to
Yes. Just like a flagrant foul in basketball.

When you can eject and suspend a player for what White did, something needs to change.
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
18004 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:19 pm to
Nope.
The refs and/or replay officials will frick that up too.

Just make it a 15 yard penalty and only throw a player out of the game if he has two personal fouls.

Posted by BamaHater
Houston
Member since Sep 2003
13536 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:26 pm to
Well I guess as long as I have been on TD is should figured this has probably been posted multiple times.
Posted by DLSWVA
SW Virginia via Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2012
781 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:31 pm to
I heard that suggested on Sirius XM Monday morning. I think it would be a much more effective system.
Posted by CBarkleytruth
Member since Dec 2014
1663 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:31 pm to
Nice steal from Hanigriff
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:48 pm to
Ah, you were listening to Sirius College sports radio too huh?

I heard them suggest this the other day. It's a good idea.
Posted by sheek
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Sep 2007
43894 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:52 pm to
Yes. One of the goals to the Free Devin whife campaign is to get a refresh on the rules. It’s soudns it was written by people that never played football. I like the two strikes and you are out deal.
Posted by braindeadboxer
Utopia
Member since Nov 2011
8742 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

targeting call the refs deem unintentional




How the frick does that work
This post was edited on 10/25/18 at 7:55 pm
Posted by BamaHater
Houston
Member since Sep 2003
13536 posts
Posted on 10/25/18 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

How the frick does that work

Well the SEC refs would just deem every targeting 2 for us anyways
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram