- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:39 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
He is backed by the 15 presidents
I'm not convinced he is.
me either. and noone else knows even one that does
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:39 pm to Cshaw91
I’d tell Sankey to go screw himself, but he can’t because all he has is a pussy.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:40 pm to tgerb8
For making Sankey look like a douche nozzle.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:40 pm to sarussell01
and hey maybe you can prove we did reach out to these guys....
a) So what ? Legal experts all said they have an argument for another year. Why shouldn't we be allowed to explore adding them? Especially when this conference has a precedent for abiding by court orders.
b) Are you going to start kicking everyone out that reached out to these players? I'm sure LSU can easily prove we were not their only offer, just the one they accepted.
This is just such a laughably stupid PR move for the conference that just makes everyone look bad.
a) So what ? Legal experts all said they have an argument for another year. Why shouldn't we be allowed to explore adding them? Especially when this conference has a precedent for abiding by court orders.
b) Are you going to start kicking everyone out that reached out to these players? I'm sure LSU can easily prove we were not their only offer, just the one they accepted.
This is just such a laughably stupid PR move for the conference that just makes everyone look bad.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:44 pm to sheek
The anti-trust component is very tough to prove under the Sherman Act. Not many attorneys would undertake that except for potentially Liz Murrill.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:46 pm to LVag1997
Detrimental reliance and breach of contract are not. The SEC leaving LSU high and dry and down hundreds of millions of dollars after using LSU’s media rights to negotiate a tv deal on LSUs behalf is a slam dunk case.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:49 pm to lsuman25
LSU needs to call a special meeting to discuss the the future of Sankey. This guy needs to go.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:51 pm to tigerfan88
If I am LSU, I am trying to determine if any other school attempted any similar action. And if so, why the action against LSU solely.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:52 pm to Srobi14
All for that. But who is the replacement?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:53 pm to LVag1997
That's already been rumored on the pay sites. Harris has said that OM recruited him to come back for this season.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:54 pm to WylieTiger
Well, then what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Should be Exhibit 1 in the federal suit.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:58 pm to LVag1997
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:00 pm to WylieTiger
quote:
Harris has said that OM recruited him to come back for this season.
And if he had opted to go back there, you wouldn’t have heard a peep about any of this.
The power brokers in the SEC are scared shitless of a Kiffin-led LSU. Especially after witnessing that beatdown Saturday night.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:02 pm to boxcarbarney
Help me understand, does the expulsion go into effect immediately, and, if so, does that mean football season would be over? How does this work?
Seems like the 2026-2027 sports year would be toast from a scheduling perspective.
Seems like the 2026-2027 sports year would be toast from a scheduling perspective.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:03 pm to Buga
I think they would owe us a lot of fricking money if they did anything effective immediately, whether that is cancelling games or refusing to give us our cut of the tv deal.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:04 pm to Buga
It doesnt work and wont. This absolutely will not happen.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:04 pm to LVag1997
Replace Sankey with Nick Saban
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:05 pm to LVag1997
quote:
LVag1997
quote:
The anti-trust component is very tough to prove under the Sherman Act. Not many attorneys would undertake that except for potentially Liz Murrill.
Look Buddy, this thread already has one SlowFlowPro fricking it up. There's not enough room for another.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:05 pm to Cshaw91
This was never about just Will Wade. The central-east teams (Birmingham etc) and the new additions from the west want this for our entire sports program.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 3:06 pm
Page 18 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News