Started By
Message

re: (Rumor) LSU "is negotiating a 5 year deal" in Fball with....

Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:12 pm to
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
175732 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

do we?

Yes...

And both.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62037 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

both.




how is it better for the program?
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
175732 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:14 pm to
There's no way to know that. They certainly wouldn't have put Tech in over LSU if those two didn't play in 07, nor Georgia. USC maybe, but it would have come down between USC and LSU to get the 2nd spot in the game.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62037 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

They certainly wouldn't have put Tech in over LSU if those two didn't play in 07, nor Georgia. USC maybe, but it would have come down between USC and LSU to get the 2nd spot in the game.




There is no "they." It would have been the BCS formula.
Posted by Palm Beach Tiger
Orlando, Florida
Member since Jan 2007
30065 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

Why not? It's not very far and it would give us a little exposure in that area. And they're giving us a 3 for 2, which is pretty good. Also, it will allow us to play another game on turf, which could only help if we wound up playing in the SECCG and/or Sugar Bowl those years. And I think Houston is likely to have a better program than a lot of us think by then.


Just because we don't have to. I don't like playing teams on their field that are not in a BCS conference......nothing good can happen (except maybe recruiting and for the local fans) in terms of positioning for that season. If we win, we were supposed to win, if they just so happen to have a Brett Farve that year and FSU is coming to Hattiesburg...... know what I mean?
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
162028 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:21 pm to
I'd be willing to bet we'll be getting a cut of the gate at Reliant
Posted by Obi-Wan Tiger
Fulshear TX
Member since Jan 2004
8119 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

They certainly wouldn't have put Tech in over LSU if those two didn't play in 0


If I remember correctly (and maybe I don't) Tech was ahead of us in the standings BEFORE the last regular season weekend miracles occurred. If they were ahead of us in spite of the drubbing we put on them, it stands to reason that they'd be ahead of us if, instead of playing each other, they'd lost to someone else and we played a cupcake.

UF was very close to getting edged by UT in the final BCS. The fact that Miami was on their schedule...not a great team certainly, but no cupcake, definitely helped them.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62037 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

I'd be willing to bet we'll be getting a cut of the gate at Reliant



Oh, no doubt. That'll be more like a neutral site game than an away game.
Posted by lsutothetop
TigerDroppings Elite
Member since Jul 2008
11323 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:24 pm to
Sure there is. Virginia Tech schedules a cupcake and goes 12-1, LSU schedules a cupcake and stays 11-2, Virginia Tech vs Ohio State in the lamest BCSNC ever.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
162028 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:30 pm to
I'd actually make one or two of those trips....been wanting to check out reliant.

Overall this is a solid move and also a little frick you to Tulane for signing that contract with Bama.
Posted by Obi-Wan Tiger
Fulshear TX
Member since Jan 2004
8119 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

The fact that Miami was on their schedule...not a great team certainly, but no cupcake, definitely helped them.


Completely forgot to mention FSU as well. I think they definitely get left out if they had replaced those two with cupcake opponents.

On the flip side, if LSU had been in UF's position this season, I don't think there would have been any way we would have gone to the title game over UT with our lame OOC schedule.
This post was edited on 3/13/09 at 6:31 pm
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
79222 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:36 pm to
I don't mind scheduling home and homes...if you are a NC contender or wish to become on you have to play on the road sometime...

As far as Houston and TCU go...I look a little differently on them when it comes to these non-BCS teams...they were members of the SWC, if that league hadn't folded and the BCS came along, the SWC would have been a BCS conference league...
Posted by Pleasenewdc
Member since Oct 2008
1563 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 6:46 pm to
Not trying to be a dick or anything, but how is everyone so sure that this is a recruiting tactic? Is that speculation or fact?

Posted by diehardfan
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2005
5333 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 7:11 pm to
I'm glad we're really hanging our balls out there.
Posted by Tiger in Texas
Houston, Texas
Member since Sep 2004
22005 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 7:15 pm to
This is GREAT news & I hope it is true!! Not just because I live in Houston, but this is an LSU hotbed for talent, and every year, more & more LSU grads are moving here. Houston is becoming West Louisiana!!
Posted by Tiger Ted
Member since Mar 2009
864 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 7:19 pm to
Screw the NCAA Cougars, lets schedule the NFL Texans! We can take 'em!!!

Posted by Tiger Ted
Member since Mar 2009
864 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

On the flip side, if LSU had been in UF's position this season, I don't think there would have been any way we would have gone to the title game over UT with our lame OOC schedule.


It would have been close. But sure, it would have been nice if we had played the "Arkansas" of the Big 12, like Texas A&M

LSU
--Florida (13-1) -- #1
--Alabama (12-2) -- #4
--Georgia (10-3) -- #16
--Mississippi (9-4) -- #25
--South Carolina (7-6)
--Auburn (5-7)
--Arkansas (5-7)
--Mississippi State (4-8)

--Troy (8-5)
--Appalachian State (non-IA)
--Tulane (2-10)
--North Texas (1-11)

TEXAS
--Oklahoma (12-2) -- #2
--Texas Tech (11-2) -- #8
--Oklahoma State (9-4) -- #13
--Missouri (10-4) -- #25
--Kansas (8-5)
--Colorado (5-7)
--Baylor (4-8)
--Texas A&M (4-8)

--Arkansas (5-7) -- SEC
--Rice (10-3)
--Florida Atlantic (7-6)
--UTEP (5-7)

This post was edited on 3/13/09 at 7:34 pm
Posted by JawjaTigah
On the Bandwagon
Member since Sep 2003
22898 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

University of Houston Cougars
Mixed feelings. LSU has nothing to gain by beating UH, and a lot to lose if they win a game in the series. But on the other hand, LSU gets lots of "presence" in Houston over five years, and that can only be a plus positive in the recruiting wars in that very fertile football state and city.
Posted by otowntiger
O-Town
Member since Jan 2004
16751 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

well, much better than tulane, USL, etc.
Not much. Not much at all. This series, if true does absolutely nothing to pique my interest.
Posted by otowntiger
O-Town
Member since Jan 2004
16751 posts
Posted on 3/13/09 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

The matchup looks smart to me.
ehh, maybe, but not one that will do ANYTHING to invoke fan interest.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram