- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:23 pm to LSURussian
I can't believe we have let this go on for so long.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:24 pm to LVdolphin7
quote:
It's not even possible to cherry pick stats that can mislead anyone in believing cotton was/is better than Nola
Hey douche, you do realize no one is saying that right?
They are saying that you mentioned Ryan Eades was the second best pitcher last season, easy. No he was not. The argument can then be said that Cotton was almost to Nola's level.
That was their point.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:24 pm to ell_13
Do I really need to read this shite?
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:26 pm to tadelatt
quote:
That was their point.
I edited my posts that made that point and added bold sections to help out his reading comprehension.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:26 pm to ell_13
You literally jut fabricated his supposed "stats" when you "converted" the stats. Haha what?
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:27 pm to LVdolphin7
That thread was on starting pitchers. Eades was second..
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:27 pm to LVdolphin7
quote:
You literally jut fabricated his supposed "stats" when you "converted" the stats. Haha what?
And you literally just fabricated the entire argument of anyone vs Nola in the first place. Haha what?
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:28 pm to LVdolphin7
Those stats only prove you can manipulate numbers
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:29 pm to LVdolphin7
No. Some doucher said it was arguable. It's not arguable. Not even by the numbers.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:31 pm to LSURussian
Seriously this is just some funny shite.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:31 pm to LVdolphin7
quote:
No. Some doucher said it was arguable. It's not arguable. Not even by the numbers.
No need to call yourself a douche.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:38 pm to LVdolphin7
quote:
LVdolphin7
Look Roy (Can I call you Roy?), The one person in here that was talking, and you should go back and read, was saying that Eades was not the second best pitcher easily.
He was saying that Cotton was, not Eades. And that you need to slow down before saying the word easy.
Also, the numbers aren't fabricated, they are showing you what Cotton would look like if he were a starter like Nola. It was only meant to give you a visualization of his numbers.
If you don't get that, I am sorry. But compare apples to apples please. Don't compare Apples to vaginas.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:41 pm to tadelatt
quote:
Look Roy (Can I call you Roy?), The one person in here that was talking, and you should go back and read, was saying that Eades was not the second best pitcher easily.
He was saying that Cotton was, not Eades. And that you need to slow down before saying the word easy.
Spot on.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:43 pm to tadelatt
There is absolutely no guarantee whatsoever that oven the same innings as Nola that his numbers would e Ben close. You have no idea. You can't just multiply his numbers
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:46 pm to LVdolphin7
quote:
There is absolutely no guarantee whatsoever that oven the same innings as Nola that his numbers would e Ben close. You have no idea. You can't just multiply his numbers
That is correct. What it does is shows you what the percentages look like if you put them on level playing fields.
That is all it does.
No shite he has more K's, it is because he averaged more K/9
It was simple calculation that gave me those numbers, I didn't just make them up. I am not saying his numbers are better because if he started THIS is what it would be, I am only SHOWING you what his numbers looked like compared to Nola's in common ground
Popular
Back to top


2


