- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Randy Rosetta Reporting Jefferson was NOT involved in fight
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:12 am to slackster
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:12 am to slackster
quote:
What if Yahoo! Sports does a Freedom of Information Act request and gets Miles' emails. Then they discover that Miles was emailing the attorney (Nathan Fisher) and others in an attempt to make this go away. Ohio State Part Tweaux.
Do you know what a FOIA request is for?
0
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:12 am to jacks40
quote:
Smart people ALWAYS obtain counsel.
Definitely.
ESPECIALLY if the other side has already lawyered up. I would be stumped if they didn't get a lawyer, especially one that will do the case pro bono.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:13 am to GrindHouse
quote:
you dont know what the frick you are talking about
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:13 am to WITNESS23
Witness23
you are fricking retarded
you are fricking retarded
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:13 am to GrindHouse
quote:
GrindHouse
quote:
1 post
quote:
you dont know what the frick you are talking about
great 1st post
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:13 am to Tiger_n_ATL
I'm done 
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:13 am to spslayto
quote:
You really think JJ went out and got this lawyer?
It's documented that he has counsel.
quote:
Under your assumptions, anyone that hires a lawyer is "involved."
Usually this is the case. Involved enough to need legal defense. Why else do people hire lawyers? This isn't TV law. There is sufficent evidence to significantly implicate Jefferson here.
quote:
Why investigate or have a trial then?
For several reasons, one of which might be to determine the level of culpability, which JJ has here to some extent.
quote:
Moreover, if he were a witness, the police would want to question him anyway.
Not necessarily, and he wouldn't have to comply if asked. The fact that he was called to the station specifically speaks to the level of involvement.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:13 am to jacks40
quote:That's the FIRST thing you do genius, BEFORE ever speaking to the Police.
bullshite. You don't obtain counsel if you weren't involved
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:13 am to GrindHouse
quote:
you dont know what the frick you are talking about
Welcome aboard. Nice tone to your first post, so obviously you've lurked for a while.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:14 am to clamdip
Is there anything new on the Cam Newton deal?
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:14 am to slackster
quote:
If true, there is going to be a portion of the LSU fan base that wonders whether LSU lowered its integrity to get this swept under the rug, and those fans have a right to question that.
I agree...but I think we'd disagree in regards to who actually resides in that portion of the fan base, and what their motivation is for assuming the worst in regards to a cover upo.
I've said this since day one...wait until we finally know all we're going to know. Instead, people have run around like chickens with their heads cut off vilifying the players, Miles, etc all under the assumption/hope that the stories that came out from 1 side were 100% accurate.
there was ALWAYS going to be another side of this, and anyone but a damn fool had to know that at the very least it was going to be markedly different from the one we heard first.
I've always assumed the truth would lie somewhere in between...you?
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:15 am to Rick Rickles
quote:
Rick Rickles
Holy shite, I hope you didn't go to LSU for your degree.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:15 am to Rick Rickles
quote:
Usually this is the case. Involved enough to need legal defense. Why else do people hire lawyers? This isn't TV law. There is sufficent evidence to significantly implicate Jefferson here.
"Usually." If there is "sufficient evidence," then why have no arrests been made yet?
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:16 am to Cajun Revolution
quote:
Right when you think Team Sweep has lost...
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:16 am to junkfunky
Team sweep is in full effect! 
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:16 am to spslayto
quote:
Welcome aboard. Nice tone to your first post, so obviously you've lurked for a while.
At least since Friday. Bennet was asking if anyone knew who witness was.
grindhouse = Andrew Lowery ?
This post was edited on 8/23/11 at 11:21 am
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:17 am to Choctaw
quote:
Right when you think Team Sweep has lost...
Team Sweep for life
This post was edited on 8/23/11 at 11:18 am
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:17 am to spslayto
quote:
"Usually." If there is "sufficient evidence," then why have no arrests been made yet?
..because it involves the starting QB.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:17 am to TheDoc
does this flipside of this mean Jarvis Landry is in deep doo-doo? (conventional rant wisdom in play)
Posted on 8/23/11 at 11:17 am to WITNESS23
quote:
Could explain the whole laughing in the film room thing..... What happened?
There was another of the 1-zillion threads on this topic that linked to a news article that referenced another player (Lee?) saying JJ was "laughing in the film room", and acting normal at practice. Maybe because he knew all of the reports were BS??
Page 6 of 16
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News