- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
One of the more ridiculous talking points parroted since the NIL era started
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:37 am
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:37 am
One of the more ridiculous talking points being parroted since the NIL era started is that the SEC were the only programs that were paying players under the table, before it was legal.
I see this all the time from B10 fans on Twitter (AKA Hell), and I just find this to be so laughable. Taylor Lewan, in a Bussin With the Boys interview with Coach O, had the audacity to say "The SEC was doing NIL before NIL was a thing". Is he insinuating that the school he played at, Michigan, was not paying players under the table while he was there? Not only that, but coming from a guy whose school ran the biggest cheating operation in the history of the sport, it is just comical.
I think there is some obvious jealousy from previous success, as well as a bit of pompous bewilderment, that the simpletons in the south could possibly excel at something.
I see this all the time from B10 fans on Twitter (AKA Hell), and I just find this to be so laughable. Taylor Lewan, in a Bussin With the Boys interview with Coach O, had the audacity to say "The SEC was doing NIL before NIL was a thing". Is he insinuating that the school he played at, Michigan, was not paying players under the table while he was there? Not only that, but coming from a guy whose school ran the biggest cheating operation in the history of the sport, it is just comical.
I think there is some obvious jealousy from previous success, as well as a bit of pompous bewilderment, that the simpletons in the south could possibly excel at something.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:39 am to whitetiger1234
I have no inside knowledge, but I feel like OSU was probably the king of bags.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:46 am to whitetiger1234
quote:
One of the more ridiculous talking points being parroted since the NIL era started is that the SEC were the only programs that were paying players under the table, before it was legal.
I haven’t seen anyone say this
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:06 am to LSBoosie
quote:
I haven’t seen anyone say this
I see it all the time from B10 people on twitter. All the time.
They claim that the B10 is as dominant as they are today, due to NIL leveling the playing field regarding player compensation, which I could definitely see for a team like Indiana.
But for teams like Michigan and Ohio St., GFY.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 10:11 am
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:25 am to LSBoosie
quote:quote:I haven’t seen anyone say this
One of the more ridiculous talking points being parroted since the NIL era started is that the SEC were the only programs that were paying players under the table, before it was legal.
Seems to have been a fairly common sentiment on the few Big10 fan sites I've accidentally been on. Not universal, but common enough that I get where the OP's hyperbole comes from.where
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:32 am to The Pirate King
quote:
I have no inside knowledge, but I feel like OSU was probably the king of bags.
Don't need inside knowledge just Google tattoo-gate. Rocks and glass houses.
Popular
Back to top

2







