- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:52 pm to volfan30
quote:
No you dominated most of the game to be fair. Still, Oregon did every single thing better than LSU against Tennessee except stop the run.
No offense, but Tennessee is so bad they aren't really even a good measuring stick. They are zero threat in the passing game.
LSU had a bad game against TN. But, statistically, LSU handled Tennessee. We just turned the ball over and shot ourselves in the foot multiple times.
On the other hand, Oregon gave up about 400 yards passing and 200 yards rushing in the same game against a pretty average Arizona State team. 600 total yards is never just a "bad game". That defense has serious holes.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:53 pm to The Future
See also : vs ohio state 1/1/10
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:54 pm to offdacorner
Year of the pick 6 huh?
God you suck. Btw change your stupid sig, its old and just not true.
God you suck. Btw change your stupid sig, its old and just not true.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:55 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
You keep saying this. Their offense isn't very "gimmicky;" it just constantly creates a mismatch on the LB core of the defense.
Yeah, their season low is 42 points. It might be "gimmicky," but I'd take the production.
The thing that is tough about them is that they are extremely explosive on offense and can turn things around before you blink. Tennessee found out and Stanford really found out. Stanford was kicking their azz 21-3 and Oregon turned it on and won 52-31. They can be beaten and usually will lay an egg somewhere. But even with their weaknesses, they are tough to knock out.
This post was edited on 10/21/10 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:03 pm to BT
quote:
God you suck.
Both genius and original.
And as far as the sig goes, those are your words...much as you'd probably like to omit what you want from the history books.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:09 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
If we traded Gary Crowton for Chip Kelly.
we would have to throw in les to truly have a chance
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:13 pm to Cornholio
Since you are mister football, cornhole, tell me what this atrocious defense would do to our run game and what our speed, attacking defense would do to their wide splits?
This post was edited on 10/21/10 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:13 pm to offdacorner
Apparently for some reason it bothers you ... a lot. not a surprise though, a quick look at your post history says it all.
Speaking of history books I must have been absent from school the they declared sambo a racist word.
You were there though huh?
Speaking of history books I must have been absent from school the they declared sambo a racist word.
You were there though huh?
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:16 pm to The312
Our d would actually get penetration and hit thomas.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:20 pm to The312
Their front 7 is small and tackles pretty poorly....we would ball control our way to a 10 point win.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:24 pm to BT
quote:
I must have been absent from school the they declared sambo a racist word.
Pathetic.
I come here to talk football. You come here to put your foot in your mouth.
If you were smart, you'd try to keep your mouth shut so that your true colors wouldn't seep through. But of course "smart" is the operative word here.
BTW, I wonder how the parents of some of LSU's players would feel about your use of that word.
Once again, truly pathetic.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:27 pm to The Mick
quote:
Oregon would kill us IMO.
I can't wait to hear what you have to say next weekend after USC beats them by 4 touchdowns.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:28 pm to The312
quote:
Iknow im drunk, but r u watching same game as me? Our d would have to play outstanding 2 keep us in it.
We probably would have 2-3 picks on the floaters the ducks qb has thrown up
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:31 pm to offdacorner
Two comments.
1. They really should think about taking some of their starters out.
2. I might usually be a bit drunk for our games and not remember correctly, but their stadium might be louder than ours these days. I think that has to do with expectations these days.
1. They really should think about taking some of their starters out.
2. I might usually be a bit drunk for our games and not remember correctly, but their stadium might be louder than ours these days. I think that has to do with expectations these days.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:31 pm to royals
quote:
they have the loudest stadium in the country.
nope. sorry there. been there and NOPE not even close on the field. I'd say arrowhead and TS are 2 of the loudest stadiums I have ever been too. At Oregon at least you can hear the person next to you.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:32 pm to tom
quote:
I can't wait to hear what you have to say next weekend after USC beats them by 4 touchdowns.
They might score 100 on USC's D. Though USC should be looking to try and get Oregon back for beating them by 4 TDs and posting 600+ yards of offense on them last year.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:33 pm to Jaketigger
Oregon would beat us soundly at their place and would likely beat us in Tiger Stadium. Don't kid yourself...they are better than us right now...dont be foolish.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 10:41 pm to DeltaDoc
No they are just flashy right now and everyone is going all googlyeyed over them.
Popular
Back to top


3


