- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Objective Ranking of LSU Offense in SECW
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:51 pm to Tillmanscorner
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:51 pm to Tillmanscorner
quote:
Msu had a better d than lsu. Not debatable.
You still refuse to give an answer though.
0
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:55 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
Ok. You are either trolling or retarded. The lsu offense was better than the msu offense. The msu defense was better than the lsu d. With the msu d this year, very likely lsu is 11-1. Troll somewhere else. Jesus Christ. You people are pathetic.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:57 pm to Tillmanscorner
quote:
Ok. You are either trolling or retarded
You are the retarded one if you think LSU's defense isn't just as, or more, talented than the MSU defense.
You just keep further proving you are the one with an agenda here. It started with your cherry picked stats, and has now evolved into this.
I'm not trolling. You are an official village idiot. Although, you were already one before Tiger Ree.
This post was edited on 12/8/18 at 2:00 pm
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:58 pm to Tillmanscorner
quote:
Ok. You are either trolling or retarded.
Coming from you?
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:10 pm to RB10
This thread is wonderful comic relief on a rainy Saturday. I wonder how good our stats would look if we only counted scoring plays.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:15 pm to Tillmanscorner
You seem to lack the basic understanding between facts and opinions. So, let me try to help.
- MSU has the #1 scoring defense.
That is an absolute fact.
- Because MSU has the #1 scoring defense, they are the best defense in the country.
That is an opinion.
Throughout 20 pages of this thread you have either:
A) Cherry picked stats, to fit your narrative.
Or
B) Stated your opinion, and passed it off as fact.
Are you that stupid? Or do you think we are that stupid?
- MSU has the #1 scoring defense.
That is an absolute fact.
- Because MSU has the #1 scoring defense, they are the best defense in the country.
That is an opinion.
Throughout 20 pages of this thread you have either:
A) Cherry picked stats, to fit your narrative.
Or
B) Stated your opinion, and passed it off as fact.
Are you that stupid? Or do you think we are that stupid?
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:24 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
quote:
admitting that would mean your whole thread is absolutely stupid (which we have been trying to tell you for hours now)
No it isn't. You just don't understand it and because you can't comprehend it you try to insult the OP.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:25 pm to bencoleman
quote:
No it isn't. You just don't understand it and because you can't comprehend it you try to insult the OP.
Poor village idiot. You are probably the most presistent of the village idiots though, I'll give you that.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:26 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
quote:
we are that stupid
You'll get no argument out of me or anyone else with a halfway functioning brain.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:28 pm to Tillmanscorner
quote:
I've been reading this board a good while now been, and a few things are clear. There is hardly ever real objectivity on here, except by posters with intellect. I see a lot of overemotional, low intelligence posters with clear agendas. Speaking of which, chicken has a hell of an army working for him to keep it stirred up.
Kristy! is that you? You don't mind if I call you Kristy do you? Your post reminds me of someone that use to post on here with the name of Kedwards1. Then ozone1, dawgfan128, pensacolatiger, maybe even a few more names.
This person would post like crazy for a month or two and then get banned for being a dumbass, before showing back up with a different name.
Anyway, this particular post of yours sounds just like something that person would post. So I thought I would ask.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:31 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
I wonder how good our stats would look if we only counted scoring plays.
Baw... if LSU scored on every play, the defense would be tired all the time, baw!
Can't have that, baw! Run and play defense! It's the only way!
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:34 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Obviously alter is obvious
Can anybody say pensacolatiger?
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:42 pm to Tillmanscorner
quote:
The defense could hold. That is a fact.
Honest questions....Who looked better this year, offense or defense?
Who was ranked higher in their respective areas, offense or defense?
Did we lose games because we couldn't score or the defense couldn't get stops?
Do you think Ensminger is a better OC than Aranda is a DC?
If both were fired, who do you think would be hired first?
These are serious questions, I just want to see where you stand.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:48 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
This. It IS wishful thinking. Fournette was a generational back. He didn’t do a lot his freshman year. Emery and Davis are not generational talents. Expecting them to be superstars next Year is not just wishful thinking, it’s delusional thinking.
quote:
Also, remember Fournettes freshman year? He was a physical freak, but didn't do a whole lot. Expecting Emery and Davis to step right in and be super stars (especially giving the way our offense operates) may be a bit of wishful thinking.
This post was edited on 12/8/18 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:50 pm to ellis197575
I'd like to ask a question as well.
We will be going into the 4th year with Orgeron as the guy responsible for recruiting. How long does he get to use talent or lack of at certain positions as an excuse for substandard results?
We will be going into the 4th year with Orgeron as the guy responsible for recruiting. How long does he get to use talent or lack of at certain positions as an excuse for substandard results?
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:52 pm to Stephen1979
quote:
We will be going into the 4th year with Orgeron as the guy responsible for recruiting. How long does he get to use talent or lack of at certain positions as an excuse for substandard results?
We’re going into the 4th year of Orgeron as head coach.
If not, the O-pumpers need to quit padding his win total with interim wins.
You can’t have it both ways.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 3:01 pm to Tillmanscorner
The problem with this analysis is that other teams can and do score against Alabama. So you are boosting LSU's numbers and diminishing the others. Just leave it as is.
The best analysis is PP In regulation because OT is made for TV and designed to maximize points.
The best analysis is PP In regulation because OT is made for TV and designed to maximize points.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 3:20 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
quote:
Proud Member of Chickens Army
Did you just add that because of this thread?
If so, that's funny as all get out.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 3:28 pm to Tillmanscorner
Since you’re being so even handed in removing a game where we scored 0 pts...how bout remove the real anomoly stats...you know ..the one with 7 OTs and 72 pts? 
Posted on 12/8/18 at 3:46 pm to Genestealer55
He said earlier that he excluded all 7 of the OTs.
Page 20 of 22
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News