Started By
Message

re: No retribution against 91?

Posted on 1/1/19 at 4:59 pm to
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 4:59 pm to
Retribution came in the form of 4 TD passes and tagging their first loss in 2 years on them.
Posted by Skippy_
Member since Oct 2018
668 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:00 pm to
We don’t see everything on TV. I can guarantee you the offensive lineman gave him a few elbows and stomps in the pile
Posted by eddieray
Lafayette
Member since Mar 2006
18027 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:03 pm to
The hit was clean even if a little bush league. It would make me feel like a little bitch if I complained about it
Posted by zackcary
Member since Jun 2011
288 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:09 pm to
As per NCAA an example of a defenseless player
quote:

A quarterback any time after a change of possession.


LINK
Posted by zackcary
Member since Jun 2011
288 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:10 pm to
According to NCAA rules the fact he even hit Burrow was a penalty.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111148 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

No retribution against 91?
Huh?

We absolutely got the best possible retribution on both of them, what are you talking about?
Posted by TigerRugbyMuthaFers
Member since Jan 2019
3 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:45 pm to
Listen I'm a Tiger fan since day one of my life and a alumni but that is the most disappointing thing about the entire game. No retribution. C'mon. Nothing but choir boys on the offensive line. We needs some red blooded Cajuns. I promise if we had some Dufrene and Bourgeois, number 91 would have never walked off the field. I understand the Tigers won but #91 and the douche who stood over T-Joe taunting him should have paid for that crap and paid in blood. Where are the guys who never play and want to take one for the team and become Louisiana folk heroes. This team is a reflection of their coach, all bark and no bite.
Posted by TigerRugbyMuthaFers
Member since Jan 2019
3 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:46 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/1/19 at 6:16 pm
Posted by Bandits58
Mississippi
Member since Sep 2015
3006 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:47 pm to
It was a legal block!! That’s football
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111148 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

Listen I'm a Tiger fan since day one of my life and a alumni but that is the most disappointing thing about the entire game. No retribution.
We literally got the best retribution possible. Not just a W, but a W where we completed dominated their defense.

quote:

I promise if we had some Dufrene and Bourgeois, number 91 would have never walked off the field.
What happened was even better, they got to play 4 quarters getting smoked, and walked off the field a loser today.

Posted by stho381
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2012
4628 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

Hate to say it, but that was a clean hit.


If that's a clean hit, then so was Delpit's. This "letter of the rule" bullshite needs to get fixed. The single most dangerous play to a player in the game was that hit on Burrow and not only did every ref in the stadium miss the call, but the replay official did too.

Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
24285 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

It was a legal block!! That’s football

It wasn't based on the rule. Head and neck area...if you replay it you will see that. Burrow didn't just get a cut on his face because it wasn't in the head or neck area.

But as for the topic, winning is the ultimate retribution. I would have liked to someone bulldoze #91, but I will take the W.
Posted by lovinLSU
lafayette
Member since Nov 2007
13892 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 8:04 pm to
#91 should have had his nutz stomped on in the pile where he wouldnt even have known his name after what he did to Burrow...yea, im ole school...
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

gash in neck where his helmet dug into it?



No there wasn't. That was a "hickie" from his shoulder pads.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9260 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 8:08 pm to
When you are losing players on D left and right, if you want to win there is no time for such pettiness

Winning is good enough.
Posted by SXV
Member since Feb 2016
1679 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 8:08 pm to
They are currently waiting on him to post a PS4 for sale on Craigslist as we speak.



ETA: Thanks for exposing that those frauds couldn’t even compete with at best your second-string defense
This post was edited on 1/1/19 at 8:09 pm
Posted by RoaringTiger33
Member since Jun 2011
567 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 8:14 pm to
Peel back blocks haven't been legal for a while now you dumbass.
Posted by CajunPowah
Member since Jan 2016
374 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 8:39 pm to
Our entire team should have been looking to dispense some justice on that fat piece of shite.

It may have been a legal hit, but its still a total panzy arse thing to do to crackback on a QB who doesnt even know you are there. That guy is a bitch as far as I'm concerned, and there should have been payback for to #91 for that hit. The guy really deserved to have his arse beat for that.

Too bad this isnt hockey where the guy would have had to drop the gloves with somebody.
Posted by Tesla
the Laurentian Abyss
Member since Dec 2011
7981 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

No retribution against 91? Or the douche LB who was taunting over Joe was he was on the ground?


Well, not yet. I live only 90 minutes from Orlando. He might get his arse Terry Tate'd walking to class in a few weeks. Just sayin.'
Posted by ELLSSUU
Member since Jan 2005
7327 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 8:58 pm to
I thought a different UCF player ran up and taunted after the hit?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram