Started By
Message

NCAA Football Rules Committee Proposed rule changes on Targeting and OT

Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:22 pm
Posted by NASA_ISS_Tiger
Huntsville, Al via Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2005
7975 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:22 pm
LINK

Football Rules Committee proposes modifying targeting protocols
Progressive penalty and instant replay changes among recommendations
March 1, 2019 2:16pmGreg Johnson

The NCAA Football Rules Committee met this week in Indianapolis and recommended two adjustments to its targeting rules to strengthen one of the most important calls of the game.

The committee, chaired by Stanford coach David Shaw, proposed a progressive penalty for those student-athletes who receive a second targeting foul in the same season. In addition to being disqualified from that game, the player would be suspended for the team’s next contest.

The second adjustment to the targeting rule deals with the instant replay review. Instant replay officials will be directed to examine all aspects of the play and confirm the foul when all elements of targeting are present. If any element of targeting cannot be confirmed, then the replay official will overturn the targeting foul. There will not be an option for letting the call on the field stand during a targeting review.

“The targeting rule has been effective in changing player behavior,” said Steve Shaw, NCAA secretary-rules editor. “The progressive penalty is to ensure that a player re-evaluates his technique, with coaching staff support, after he receives a targeting foul. Additionally, the instant replay review changes will ensure that when a player is disqualified, it is clearly warranted.”

Before taking effect, the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel must review and approve the committee’s proposals. A membership comment period will be conducted to collect feedback for committee consideration. PROP is scheduled to review these proposals April 17. The proposals will be shared with the NCAA Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports, which will be invited to comment.
Kickoffs

The committee conducted a robust examination of the kickoff play, including the fair-catch change made in 2018. Approximately 12 percent of all kickoff plays in the Football Bowl Subdivision were touchbacks as a result of the fair-catch rule. Data showed that overall injuries on kickoffs declined during the 2018 season.

In an effort to continue this positive momentum, the committee voted to eliminate the two-man wedge formation on all kickoffs. The group will continue to review all aspects of the kickoff play and will consider future adjustments, if needed, in the coming seasons.
Overtime

The committee proposed a tweak to the overtime rules. If a game reaches a fifth overtime, teams would run alternating 2-point plays, instead of starting another drive at the opponent’s 25-yard line. This recommendation is being made to limit the number of plays from scrimmage and to bring the game to a conclusion.

The committee also is proposing a two-minute rest period after the second and fourth overtimes. The rules for the first four overtimes would remain unchanged.

In the past four seasons, only seven games across all divisions lasted longer than four overtimes.

“The NCAA overtime rules continue to be very popular with our fans and coaches,” Steve Shaw said. “This change impacts only a small number of our contests but will eliminate plays from long overtime games.”
Blind-Side Blocks

The committee recommended a change in blind-side blocking technique. Players will not be allowed to deliver a blind-side block by attacking an opponent with forcible contact. It will be considered a personal foul and a 15-yard penalty. If the block also includes the elements of targeting, it will be a blind-side block with targeting.


This post was edited on 3/1/19 at 2:23 pm
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
27755 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

The committee recommended a change in blind-side blocking technique. Players will not be allowed to deliver a blind-side block by attacking an opponent with forcible contact.

This has potential to be a shite show.
This post was edited on 3/1/19 at 2:26 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64420 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:26 pm to
So instead of dialing back targeting, they are enhancing the penalties and even adding new previously legal plays that will now also be targeting. Nice
This post was edited on 3/1/19 at 2:27 pm
Posted by JohnnyU
Florida
Member since Nov 2006
12350 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:28 pm to
So, it still doesn't take into account the potential for a non- egregious, incidental hit with targeting elements. It would way too much to have a "flagrant" and non-flagrant version. Way to go Rules Committee.

Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
67755 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

The committee recommended a change in blind-side blocking technique. Players will not be allowed to deliver a blind-side block by attacking an opponent with forcible contact. It will be considered a personal foul and a 15-yard penalty. If the block also includes the elements of targeting, it will be a blind-side block with targeting.



Yea this is gonna be a nightmare if this passes
Posted by Pole142
Metry
Member since Jun 2016
132 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:30 pm to
"The second adjustment to the targeting rule deals with the instant replay review. Instant replay officials will be directed to examine all aspects of the play and confirm the foul when all elements of targeting are present. If any element of targeting cannot be confirmed, then the replay official will overturn the targeting foul. There will not be an option for letting the call on the field stand during a targeting review. "
__________________________________________________

the Devin White Rule.
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
27755 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:32 pm to
Enhancing the penalty, but I don’t see where they’re adding anything else. Since it has to be confirmed and can’t just “stand”, some of the BS accidental stuff should be eliminated.

Blind side blocks may now be a penalty, based on some subjective interpretation of “attacking” or “forcible”, but targeting was already a possibility.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42187 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:38 pm to
Refs couldn't even make that call against Burrow in the UCF game
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
27755 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:41 pm to
It should have been and I have no idea why it wasn’t. But they reviewed it to see if it was targeting, it isn’t like they didn’t even consider the possibility since it was a blind side block situation.
Posted by Bengal26
Member since Oct 2014
1776 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:04 pm to
Did they just completely forget that football is a damn contact sport?? Good lord..
Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:09 pm to
Nope
Posted by Codythetiger
Arkansas
Member since Nov 2006
27531 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

The committee, chaired by Stanford coach David Shaw, proposed a progressive penalty for those student-athletes who receive a second targeting foul in the same season. In addition to being disqualified from that game, the player would be suspended for the team’s next contest.




fricking progressives literally ruin everything


Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43785 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

The committee, chaired by Stanford coach David Shaw, proposed a progressive penalty for those student-athletes who receive a second targeting foul in the same season. In addition to being disqualified from that game, the player would be suspended for the team’s next contest


So you get a targeting penalty in game 1, and then another in a conference championship game. You miss a playoff game.

That's fricking brilliant.
Posted by Codythetiger
Arkansas
Member since Nov 2006
27531 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:25 pm to


Why not just play flag football instead, fricking sheesh
Posted by Amish threesome
Olive Branch
Member since Oct 2013
976 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:47 pm to
Sarcastic a ball is on the way.
Posted by schwartzy
New Orleans
Member since May 2014
9026 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:47 pm to
bullshite changes.

Look, it's this simple: If a player makes a flagrant hit to the crown of the head while leading with head, that is targeting. The bullshite call where Grant Delpit made a tackle while a guy was spinning down, thus he hit his head, should not be a targeting foul. Delpit wasn't able to adjust while a guy is spinning upside down in mid air. That should not have been targeting.

Devin White's shove to the chest of Fitzgerald was also NEVER targeting. Should have never been called, and sure as hell should have never been a confirmed call.

Posted by Cannon style
Homer,La.
Member since Sep 2018
1582 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:50 pm to
All that sucks. Hope it don't pass
Posted by FreeState
Member since Jun 2012
3161 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 4:00 pm to
Glad they put someone from a liberal west coast school in charge of the committee. I guess no one from UCal Berkley was available.
This post was edited on 3/1/19 at 4:01 pm
Posted by dirtbag lsu
Not in Texas anymore ...dammit
Member since Feb 2005
2884 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 4:12 pm to
And yet NONE OF THIS AFFECTS a certain team that wears Crimson.

Just everyone else.
Posted by larry289
Holiday Island, AR
Member since Nov 2009
3858 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Instant replay officials will be directed to examine all aspects of the play and confirm the foul when all elements of targeting are present. If any element of targeting cannot be confirmed, then the replay official will overturn the targeting foul. There will not be an option for letting the call on the field stand during a targeting review.

What the hell were they doing before??
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram