- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Matt Canada -- Master of Disguise -- Pro Style Spread Offense
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:14 am to luvdatigahs
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:14 am to luvdatigahs
quote:
Hey, my gam gam didn't have a tv, and even she knew what to expect.
I bet your gam gam was the best gam gam in the world. my mimi is the best mimi in the world
1
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:15 am to Rickdaddy4188
Since you've proven on multiple occasions that you're completely incapable of explaining what a "smashmouth spread" is, I'll take it that you're just repeating the same regurgitated media bullshite buzzwords that's being used to describe modern RPO spread offenses. But it's okay though, dude. It really is. You're just on a different level than us. How could any of us have known where a 6 tech lines up?
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:17 am to rmnldr
quote:
Since you've proven on multiple occasions that you're completely incapable of explaining what a "smashmouth spread" is, I'll take it that you're just repeating the same regurgitated media bullshite buzzwords that's being used to describe modern RPO spread offenses. But it's okay though, dude. It really is. You're just on a different level than us. How could any of us have known where a 6 tech lines up?
holy shite. you didn't even know what a smashmouth offense was so why the frick would you know what rpo is?
and for the record I didn't start personal attacks or take shots at your football knowledge 1st.
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 3:20 am
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:19 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
holy shite. you didn't even know what a smashmouth offense was so why the frick would you know what rpo is?
It's just a fricking vertical spread concept RPO. Why are you and everyone else calling it "smashmouth spread"? It sounds like something out of a retarded madden video game.
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 3:20 am
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:23 am to rmnldr
quote:
It's just a fricking vertical spread concept RPO. Why are you and everyone else calling it "smashmouth spread"? It sounds like something out of a retarded madden video game.
because it's built upon inside zone option. between the tackles.
you'd rather say," auburn runs a vertical run pass offense that built upon inside zone option"?
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 3:24 am
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:28 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
you'd rather say," auburn runs a vertical run pass offense that built upon inside zone option"?
Well I'd actually say that Auburn runs a wing-t spread option vertical concept RPO offense
But hey, smashmouth spread may sound retarded but it works.
to life, love, and the smashmouth spreadPosted on 8/4/17 at 3:29 am to rmnldr
quote:
Well I'd actually say that Auburn runs a wing-t spread option vertical concept RPO offense
But hey, smashmouth spread may sound retarded but it works.
to life, love, and the smashmouth spread
so ready for the season.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:42 am to Rickdaddy4188
Hnnnnngggggg
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:48 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
exactly. let the football ignorant posters out themselves.
I don't think this argument is about football ignorance. It's quibbling over how to define a "massive change."
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:06 am to Purplehaze44
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:18 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:Good God you're a miserable fricker
Rickdaddy4188
How the hell did you manage to frick up this perfectly interesting thread?
Posted on 8/4/17 at 8:14 am to Space Cowboy
If we had Canada last season we beat Alabama probably. Oh well. It got Les fired.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 9:36 am to Madking
quote:
He seemed like a d-bag.
For telling the truth?
Fact is, Canada's offenses while he is an OC aren't any better than Les's offenses here at LSU.
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 10:19 am
Posted on 8/4/17 at 9:42 am to SportTiger1
quote:
Fact is, Canada's offenses while he is an OC are any better than Les's offenses here at LSU.
I'm not sure you phrased this correctly.
But, IF you are saying Canada's offenses are NOT better than Les'.....I think you could ONLY determine that if you are able to control for the 'athlete disparity' relative to each team, right?
I mean, LSU lines up with an advantage in all but 1 or 2 games each year.
If I coach the Golden State Warriors and Coach K coaches the Sacramento Kings.... my team "winning" does not make me a better coach.
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 9:43 am
Posted on 8/4/17 at 9:51 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
I have a PHD in stupidity
Fify
Posted on 8/4/17 at 9:55 am to Space Cowboy
I am a huge fan of the Canada hire and I think he will do very well for us. However, if you think that he's going to magically transform our team into the Alabama giant killer you are sorely mistaken. There have been many great offensive coaches in the SEC (Spurrier, Mullen , Meyer, Malzahn, etc.) And more often than not, little Nicky figures them out. Canada has never coached a down of football in the SEC and we know our league is on a whole other level aka NFL lite. Let's pump the breaks a little kids. Sorry for the reality check rantards.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 10:14 am to Purplehaze44
quote:Me personally, with modern football I choose to define "massive change" with formations/personnel utilization over play selection.
I don't think this argument is about football ignorance. It's quibbling over how to define a "massive change."
Baylor had 628 rush att for 3143 yds while LSU had 459 att for 2796 yds.
Oregon runs over 60% of the time out of their spread.
You can pass out of the power I or a Wing. Number of eligible receivers didn't change. Lou Holtz at Notre Dame did it very well (just not often). Can utilize the FB or TE in the passing game.
We can all agree there's a "massive difference" between Baylor/Oregon and LSU, and it isn't run to pass ratio.
So to me if you are changing the formations (or player utilization) and hitting the same holes (or route trees) it is a massive difference.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 10:14 am to GeauxJZK
Canada's offense was the only one to outscore the team that beat Bama.
Little Nicky never did figure out Clemson's offense. And Pitt's was better.
Little Nicky never did figure out Clemson's offense. And Pitt's was better.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 10:20 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
But, IF you are saying Canada's offenses are NOT better than Les'.....I think you could ONLY determine that if you are able to control for the 'athlete disparity' relative to each team, right?
Correct, they are NOT better.
I conceded that Canada has never had the athletes that he has at LSU, but at many of his stops he was not playing against our level of competition.
I think he'll do fine at LSU, but he could also very easily be called a one hit wonder.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 10:21 am to LMfan
quote:
Canada's offense was the only one to outscore the team that beat Bama.
Little Nicky never did figure out Clemson's offense. And Pitt's was better.
Thats not how this works.
Page 4 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News