- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 8/31/25 at 5:58 pm to TigerKing19
Y'all have a nice day. 
Posted on 8/31/25 at 5:59 pm to Geauxldilocks
The call by the referee was obviously that the catch was made because he ruled him oob, which is incompetence fully on display by an SEC official. So if the catch is made before crossing the end line then when the runner with the ball crosses the goal line, it is a TD. The ultimate call was incorrect.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 5:59 pm to TigerKing19
quote:
Yes which means you must have 7 on the line
Wrong. What if you have 10 on the field? You're still legal. You said the rule states 7 on the line. It clearly does not. So much for admitting your error.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:03 pm to 62zip
Why would I admit I'm wrong when I'm not? 
No matter what you have to have 7 on the line. I literally just read the rule.
No matter what you have to have 7 on the line. I literally just read the rule. Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:04 pm to 62zip
Are you really this dense?
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:04 pm to TigerKing19
quote:
Yes which means you must have 7 on the line.
Just got explanation from an NCAA referee. About 5 years ago both NCAA and NFHS changed the rule to say only you can’t have more than 4 off the ball. You do not need 7 on the line. Example, you only have 10 on the field because a TE ( who would be on the line) forgets to come out, and you have 5 lineman and a SE on the line, and the qb, rb, slot, and a fb off the ball; you still have a legal formation with fewer than 7 on the los. And you could legally put 10 on the los as well.
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:06 pm to yccsmf
Ok. Everything I read says you need at least 7. If they changed the rule it's not coming up when I search. I stand corrected.
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:11 pm to yccsmf
What's your opinion on the overturned touchdown? I thought he had possession and made a football move, so it should have been a touchdown.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:13 pm to 62zip
I apologize bro on the dense comment. 
If I'm wrong I'm wrong.
If I'm wrong I'm wrong. 
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:14 pm to TigerKing19
quote:
Ok. Everything I read says you need at least 7. If they changed the rule it's not coming up when I search. I stand corrected.
I thought the same thing, and that’s what the rule used to state, they simply removed any reference to 7 on and simply require no more than 4 off now.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:15 pm to SludgeFactory
quote:
blatant cheating
I understand the emotion because it truly was a stupefyingly bad call but y’all lose me with the conspiracy stuff. If these games are fixed they’re doing a terrible job of fixing them. Refs just suck at their jobs. Period. They’re some of the most bumbling professional fools that exist to do anything.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:16 pm to SludgeFactory
Yall need to get a grip.
They were bad calls. Bad calls happen.
Why do yall live like this? You can literally do nothing about it. There's no way I'd watch something that made me, a grown man, this angry.
They were bad calls. Bad calls happen.
Why do yall live like this? You can literally do nothing about it. There's no way I'd watch something that made me, a grown man, this angry.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:20 pm to TigerKing19
[quote]What's your opinion on the overturned touchdown? I thought he had possession and made a football move, so it should have been a touchdown.
I’m 57 years old, so I’m calling that a catch and a touchdown all day long. But with the rules these days I’m completely clueless. I guess they said he didn’t control the ball and complete the catch?
I’m 57 years old, so I’m calling that a catch and a touchdown all day long. But with the rules these days I’m completely clueless. I guess they said he didn’t control the ball and complete the catch?
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:22 pm to yccsmf
Yeah I think it changes from crew to crew. Nobody knows what a catch is anymore. Nice chatting with you.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:35 pm to Chadwick
So regardless of any doublespeak yada yada about what constitutes a catch- just look at this clip and then have any official explain how the ref right on top of the play, on the goal line, ran over and spotted him out-of-bounds on the 1yd line?
Just explain that part, with a straight face.
Just explain that part, with a straight face.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:36 pm to atltiger6487
quote:
thinking the refs are cheating is utterly ridiculous. Were there some questionable calls? Sure, but that happens every game, to both teams. You’re an LSU fan so you see what you want to see. Go back and watch the game from Clemson’s perspective and you’d see a bunch of calls/no calls that went against them too.
Here is what a lot of you are missing- Officials on the field make mistakes, sometime egregious (see no grounding). But, it is blatant, biased cheating when you OVERTURN a call on the field like they did the TD with replay. It's like "Birmingham" takes the stance that they have to prove LSU did not make a good play, not disprove the call on the field with indisputable video evidence. They did not have that here and just said frick it, we say it's not a catch.
How many times do we get royally fricked by the replay officials in Bama's backyard?
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:43 pm to TigerKing19
quote:
made a football move
A football move is a juke, cut etc. Just continuing your path and falling to the ground is not a football move.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:48 pm to MikeD
I'll go with what the official in the booth and others have said since the game. They blew the call! It was a touchdown! I'm just glad we didn't need it.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:51 pm to TigerKing19
I havent read the rule book either but I did see, late in the 4th quarter, our O Line getting pressure on the qb when we were tackled from behind and brought down by a pair of defenders.... I didnt think u could do that on the line.
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News