- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU WBB a 2 seed paired with UCLA as 1 seed
Posted on 3/15/26 at 10:24 pm to BigTigerJoe
Posted on 3/15/26 at 10:24 pm to BigTigerJoe
Was LSU, the lowest rated 2 seed?
Believe it was Vandy.
Believe it was Vandy.
2
Posted on 3/15/26 at 10:32 pm to FriscoTiger
so are we!!!… !!!GEAUXTIGERS!!!…
Posted on 3/16/26 at 3:57 am to BOSCEAUX
quote:
Was LSU, the lowest rated 2 seed?
quote:
Believe it was Vandy.
Thanks. Makes sense.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 7:03 am to lsucoonass
It is, but that would destroy this board’s (insert whatever) hates LSU narrative.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:35 am to saintsfan22
quote:
Little troll they got coaching at UCLA talking shite again
She's just jealous of all the attention LSU and Kim get, while she has to beg people to show up to their games.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 12:45 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
You should have specified GOOD basketball
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:24 pm to Tigerbait357
Let's geaux, Lady Tigers!
Posted on 3/17/26 at 12:08 am to 30 Plus Three
Anyone considering making the trip up to Sacramento for Sweet 16?
Posted on 3/17/26 at 12:55 am to timlan2057
quote:
We would have to beat one of Texas, SC, UConn, or UCLA in the Elite Eight. Might as well be UCLA.
I want SC. I dont think they could beat LSU three times in one year.
And of course Texas has the easiest path. They are playing in a Texas Regional...against Tennessee.
Posted on 3/17/26 at 9:40 am to BOSCEAUX
I think UCLA was the lowest 1 seed so you would think that they considered LSU the highest 2 seed? But because of Texas a SC may have shuffled a bit
Posted on 3/17/26 at 9:56 am to Kocin
quote:
I think UCLA was the lowest 1 seed so you would think that they considered LSU the highest 2 seed? But because of Texas a SC may have shuffled a bit
I don’t think “lowest one, highest two” was considered, at least initially. Top priority was separating the SEC’s one seeds (SC and Texas) from the SEC two seeds (LSU and Vandy.)
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:12 am to timlan2057
While you might be right you would then have to then state the argument for Iowa or Michigan being the best 2 seed which I don’t see
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:42 am to Kocin
Just looked at the brackets and LSU vs Baylor is a possibility in the sweet 16.
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:48 am to Kocin
quote:
I think UCLA was the lowest 1 seed so you would think that they considered LSU the highest 2 seed? But because of Texas a SC may have shuffled a bit
UConn was top 1 seed, followed by UCLA, Texas, South Carolina.
We don't know specifically the order of the 2 seeds. We do know this:
LSU is a higher 2 than Vandy because Vandy got paired with the best #1 seed UConn and LSU got paired with the 2nd best #1 (UCLA)
Also, it stands to reason that Iowa is a higher 2 than Michigan since Iowa was paired with the lower #1 (S. Carolina) and Michigan was paired with the higher #1 (Texas)
And this is true:
quote:
Top priority was separating the SEC’s one seeds (SC and Texas) from the SEC two seeds (LSU and Vandy.)
This post was edited on 3/17/26 at 10:49 am
Posted on 3/17/26 at 4:54 pm to LSUGrad9295
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/17/26 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 3/17/26 at 9:02 pm to Jim bean xxx
UConn-UCLA-Texas-Carolina, those are the #1 seeds in order. UCLA was the second #1 seed who many thought should be the first #1 seed based on having so many Q1 wins.
LSU was the highest #2 seed with Vandy the second highest.
LSU was the highest #2 seed with Vandy the second highest.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News