- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU vs USC
Posted on 8/24/08 at 1:28 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 8/24/08 at 1:28 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
You are slectively quoting leaving out points that do not support your point of view. I have already stated that prior to you going way off into left field.
Incorrect. YOu don't know if you were here then to witness what was said on here back then. You alluded to it several times.
quote:
You stated that I was posting like I was here to bear witnes
That's true. ANd I'm right.
quote:
I never claimed to bear witness
Not directly, no.
quote:
THus, your contention is disproved yet again, because you appear get all caught up in what you "think" I meant
Who the hell do you think you're fooling? You must have fell off the turnip truck yesterday.
My point is you weren't around to witness it. ANd you don't deny that, right?
These little games you're playing aren't working.
quote:
You also sometimes read words that are not in a post to help your points
Everything I read is what you post and then summarize it. Get over it.
quote:
Let me make it clear AGAIN. I did not contend that I was here prior to 2003 to witness. I stated I am certain of of the lack of USC posts then though
And that's my point. Thanks, AGAIN for helping me.
2
Posted on 8/24/08 at 1:29 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Are you actually claiming that it is bright and sunny outside?
Thanks for proving my poin
Absolutely terrible
Posted on 8/24/08 at 1:34 pm to Rocket
quote:
YOu don't know if you were here then to witness what was said on here back then.
There you go again. I am careful. I said, certain, sure, confident.
quote:
Not directly, no. That's true. ANd I'm right.
Or indirectly. You read too much into it. Green Bay won the first two SUperBowls. I was not there to witness.
quote:
My point is you weren't around to witness it. ANd you don't deny that, right?
Never said I was. Are you actually claiming to be 8 foot 11 inches tall? I say no and have proven my point that you should not have claimed that.
Posted on 8/24/08 at 1:39 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
There you go again. I am careful. I said, certain, sure, confident.
I can read. I know that.
quote:
Or indirectly. You read too much into it. Green Bay won the first two SUperBowls. I was not there to witness.
That information is easily accessible.
Nope, you posted as if you were around then to witness what was happening, although you never said "I was reading the site then". You didn't have to say it. I never argued what was or wasn't said back then.
quote:
Never said I was
Good. Just letting you know that you're just going on a hunch.
You have reading comprehension problems. If you didn't, you wouldn't have told me to check the "data".
quote:
Are you actually claiming to be 8 foot 11 inches tall? I say no and have proven my point that you should not have claimed that.
Did I claim I was?
Posted on 8/24/08 at 1:40 pm to Rocket
quote:
And that's my point. Thanks, AGAIN for helping me.
Rocket, you have a knack for claiming that people posted things which they, ineed have not posted. You then badger the person, attempting to "call him or her out" on something they have not even posted. You then continue to stand by your original contention and because the person did not post it in the first place, you claim your point is proven. My god!
quote:
Did I claim I was?
As did I claim I bore witness? Thanks for proving my point.
This post was edited on 8/24/08 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 8/24/08 at 1:46 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Rocket, you have a knack for claiming that people posted things which they, ineed have not posted. You then badger the person, attempting to "call him or her out" on something they have not even posted. You then continue to stand by your original contention and because the person did not post it in the first place, you claim your point is proven. My god!
You didn't have to directly state you weren't here to witness what was happening. If you had strong reading comprehension skills, you wouldn't have carried on about what I was or wasn't arguing. You would have never asked me to check the "data" from then, if you had strong reading comprehension skills.
Regardless, you acknowledged you weren't around then to witness what was going on, eventhough you decided to state in such a strong manner as if you were around then to witness what was or wasn't being said.
Posted on 8/24/08 at 2:15 pm to EastBankTiger
quote:
...lots of empty seats and little if any noise....
I was also there. The game started around noon, I believe. One of the smallest crowds I've ever seen at a USC game. Also probably the quietest. Small but very vocal contingent of LSU fans in the SE corner made most of the noise that day. I can't recall anything positive about the Trojan's performance that day.
Posted on 8/24/08 at 2:59 pm to Rocket
quote:
Regardless, you acknowledged you weren't around then to witness what was going on, eventhough you decided to state in such a strong manner as if you were around then to witness what was or wasn't being said.
I wil repeat yet again since you have a hard time digesting when you are proven incorrect. I stated it in such a strong manner b/c I am that confident about my statement. Not because I was impying that I was here to witness. That would be attributed to you and another one of your incorrect interpretations. I stated that early on. However if you had reading comprehension skills you would not have carried on, even after you stated you would not make issue of it.
Posted on 8/24/08 at 3:18 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I wil repeat yet again since you have a hard time digesting when you are proven incorrect
I was not proven incorrect.
quote:
stated it in such a strong manner b/c I am that confident about my statement. Not because I was impying that I was here to witness
People may interpret things differently. All you had to say from the get go was that you weren't around to witness it first hand and we wouldn't have carried on. You couldn't swallow your pride instead and thought I was arguing about what was or wasn't posted back then, otherwise you wouldn't have told me several times to check the "data".
quote:
However if you had reading comprehension skills you would not have carried on, even after you stated you would not make issue of it.
Again, if you had strong reading comprehension skills you wouldn't have been arguing with me what was or wasn't posted back then, and you wouldn't have subsequently asked me to "check the data". It took you several pages for you to realize what I was arguing.
Just like that last thread we got into it. If you had the courage to swallow your pride and admit you cared about what LSU fans say about USC(as we can conclude from the amount of time you've spent on the subject regardless if you directly say it or not), we wouldn't have carried on in that other thread. Instead you couldn't swallow your pride and you ignorantly tried to turn it around on me. And it was disastrous for you.
Posted on 8/24/08 at 3:46 pm to Rocket
quote:
People may interpret things differently. All you had to say from the get go was that you weren't around to witness it first hand and we wouldn't have carried on. You couldn't swallow your pride instead and thought I was arguing about what was or wasn't posted back then, otherwise you wouldn't have told me several times to check the "data".
You are the pot calling the kettle black. You recently had a post stating that you "know" that LSU fans will get antsy or something of the sort if they fall out of the SEC race early. Perhaps you need to go back adn preface that so it does not get questioned. Know is a "strong" word as you implied. You prefaced it with nothing. One could easily say "how do you know that for sure?". But that woudl look quite follish, b/c, even though you predicted the future, which you warned me against, you will likely be correct. You are the one who has a difficult time swallowing your pride when I pointed out early on that I was probably not around then and clarified that many many times.
quote:
Just like that last thread we got into it. If you had the courage to swallow your pride and admit you cared about what LSU fans say about USC(as we can conclude from the amount of time you've spent on the subject regardless if you directly say it or not), we wouldn't have carried on in that other thread. Instead you couldn't swallow your pride and you ignorantly tried to turn it around on me. And it was disastrous for you.
It's not a pride issue with me. Just as in other threads when you incorrectly assumed I implied and even typed "death" threats, your assumptions are incorrect.
By the way, nice attempt at a personal attack on "reading comprehension". Almost as bad as name calling, which you have also done. That is almost a new low. I was well aware of what you meant and stated many many many times that I did not have to be around here to be correct. You see I bolded that one for you. I only tagged the "I am confident I am sure" because you seem to question how I could "know" that. My point was and always has been, I do not need to know to be sure in this case. And you challenged that as well.
This post was edited on 8/24/08 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 8/24/08 at 3:51 pm to Rocket
quote:
You know as well as I do there will be plenty of fans, right or wrong, who will be a little on edge if we get knocked out of the conference title race early.
Can you predict the future? Please tell me or link me with this knowledge.
Posted on 8/24/08 at 3:53 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Why don't you guys get a room over at the O-T lounge? 
Posted on 8/24/08 at 4:06 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
You are the pot calling the kettle black. You recently had a post stating that you "know" that LSU fans will get antsy or something of the sort if they fall out of the SEC race early
I sure did.
quote:
Perhaps you need to go back adn preface that so it does not get questioned
No
quote:
Know is a "strong" word as you implied. You prefaced it with nothing. One could easily say "how do you know that for sure?"
It'll be okay
quote:
But that woudl look quite follish, b/c, even though you predicted the future, which you warned me against, you will likely be correct.
You have reading comprehension problems. I didn't say that.
I told you to be careful of what you say in the future about what you claim to know. I was talking about the things you recall and such, not to be careful about predicting the future, wingnut.
quote:
It's not a pride issue with me. Just as in other threads when you incorrectly assumed I implied and even typed "death" threats, your assumptions are incorrect.
That's only time I've been incorrect in any conversation with you. Unlike you, I had the courage to swallow my pride and acknowledge you didn't say that.
The problem here is you think you're fooling someone. You thought you could fool someone in the last thread that you didn't care about what LSU fans cared or obsessed with regarding USC. And it didn't turn out well for you.
quote:
y the way, nice attempt at a personal attack on "reading comprehension". Almost as bad as name calling, which you have also done. That is almost a new low. I was well aware of what you meant and stated many many many times that I did not have to be around here to be correct
You beated around the bush on that. Why did you keep telling me to check the "data" if you knew what I was arguing? You didn't. That's why. It took you a while to realize that. Why? Because you don't have strong reading comprehension skills.
quote:
see I bolded that one for you. I only tagged the "I am confident I am sure" because you seem to question how I could "know" that.
I was just trying to get you to come clean on whether or not you were around to witness what you claimed. You couldn't swallow your pride and come on out and directly say it. You didn't the courage to do that. That's why this carried on.
quote:
that. My point was and always has been, I do not need to know to be sure in this case. And you challenged that as well.
The only thing I challenged was whether or not you witnessed what was being said back then. The only reason I did was because of how confidently you said such. You didn't realize that early on. You thought I was arguing that what you claimed was being said wasn't being. Let me guess, you'll respond with something about how "I didn't say that" like a 3rd grader?
Posted on 8/24/08 at 4:08 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Can you predict the future? Please tell me or link me with this knowledge
As usual, you failed to comprehend what I was saying when I told you in the future, to be careful talking about what you know in reference to things you recall. Not about predicting the future.
Use your brain more.
Posted on 8/24/08 at 4:10 pm to Rocket
quote:
You have reading comprehension problems. I didn't say that.
Clarification. You said "if you had reading comp skills etc"? So you are still proven incorrect. I scored more than high enough on GRE verbal and ACT reading.
Posted on 8/24/08 at 4:13 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Clarification. You said "if you had reading comp skills etc"? So you are still proven incorrect. I scored more than high enough on GRE verbal and ACT reading.
If you can't clearly comprehend what I'm saying, then you have problems with reading comprehension.
quote:
I scored more than high enough on GRE verbal and ACT reading.
Any skills you have in those department eroded a long time ago.
Posted on 8/24/08 at 4:17 pm to FtBelvoirTiger
TOO CHICKEN TO EVER HAPPEN IN THIS DAY AND TIME. ONLY ON ESPN MAKEBELIEVE CHANNEL.
Posted on 8/24/08 at 4:34 pm to Rocket
quote:
I told you to be careful of what you say in the future about what you claim to know. I was talking about the things you recall and such, not to be careful about predicting the future, wingnut
Yes, and telling you to do the same when you predicted LSU fans would be upset would look foolish b/c it would likely happen. I should have put myself in your shoes and not mind looking foolish and then asked you "how do you know that" or tell you to be "very careful about what you say about the future".
[/quote]That's only time I've been incorrect in any conversation with you. Unlike you, I had the courage to swallow my pride and acknowledge you didn't say that. [/quote]
There is nothing for me to acknowledge. I did many pages ago. You just seemed to ignore it and continue on your podium, even when you stated you would not make issue anymore.
quote:
The only thing I challenged was whether or not you witnessed what was being said back then. The only reason I did was because of how confidently you said such. You didn't realize that early on. You thought I was arguing that what you claimed was being said wasn't being. Let me guess, you'll respond with something about how "I didn't say that" like a 3rd grader?
That is correct (last sentence). Because you do not seem to get it. That is you again, claiming someone posted something to prove your point that they said it. Then challenge that they said it, even though it was not said in the first place. You do not seem to comprehend that one does not have to witness something for that event to be true. Because you do not understand that is exactly why you are so adamant about me implying that I was here to witness prior to 03.
quote:
I was just trying to get you to come clean on whether or not you were around to witness what you claimed. You couldn't swallow your pride and come on out and directly say it. You didn't the courage to do that. That's why this carried on.
I did not imply that I was here prior to 2003. The two have no connection (me being here prior to 03 and the discussions here prior to 03). You seem more interested in how long I have been on this site than anyone else.
quote:
If you can't clearly comprehend what I'm saying, then you have problems with reading comprehension.
No. The problem lies with your chronic false assumptions about what one "means" in a post. In this case there is no connection b/t me bearing witness to prior to 03 and what was or was not posted here prior to 03, yet you falsely assumed I meant I was here. Then YOU have a difficult time swallowing YOUR pride when you find out (first hand --a word you frequently use) that it is not what I meant. Understand first hand? Straight from me. Yet you continue to badger as you do others, all while intermittently resorting to attempts to personally attack, as you have in the past.
This post was edited on 8/24/08 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 8/24/08 at 4:36 pm to fanrun
quote:
I love Baton Rouge, LSU and Louisiana, but the Southern Pride stuff don't strike much of a chord with me.
What kind of children are we RAISING nowadays?!!!
For those of us born before 1970, this game would mean Southern Pride -- bordering on religious crusade!
Posted on 8/24/08 at 4:50 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Yes, and telling you to do the same when you predicted LSU fans would be upset would look foolish b/c it would likely happen
I don't know why you'd tell me that because predicting things in the future was not what I was talking about.
Are you still not understanding what I was telling you? Are you really this thickheaded? Are you really thinking what I said had to do with what you say about the future? Geez.....
quote:
There is nothing for me to acknowledge. I did many pages ago. You just seemed to ignore it and continue on your podium, even when you stated you would not make issue anymore.
As long as you acknowledge you weren't around in 2003 and you're just guessing, it's cool.
quote:
Because you do not seem to get it. That is you again, claiming someone posted something to prove your point that they said it. Then challenge that they said it, even though it was not said in the first place
Please spare us this nickel and dime crybaby bullshite. Uhhwhaaha "I didn't say this, I didn't say that". You're fool because you think you have to say something directly in order for people to know what you're talking about.
quote:
I did not imply that I was here prior to 2003
Someone could interpret that when you make a claim in such a strong manner that you must've been witness to make such a strong claim.
quote:
The two have no connection (me being here prior to 03 and the discussions here prior to 03). You seem more interested in how long I have been on this site than anyone else.
No, just making sure it's crystal clear you acknowledge that you didn't witness what you claim.
quote:
No. The problem lies with your chronic false assumptions about what one "means" in a post.
Actually, the problem lies in the fact that you think in order for someone to know what you're saying you have to directly say it. Semantics. Take your tit for tat bullshite to a USC board.
quote:
In this case there is no connection b/t me bearing witness to prior to 03 and what was or was not posted here prior to 03, yet you falsely assumed I meant I was here
Not false. When you state what you did in such a strong manner what you claim, one can interpret you think you witness what was or wasn't said back then.
As long as you acknowledge you weren't around then to witness it, that's fine. ANd I'm not proven incorrect. I'm actually proven to be true on any point.
quote:
Then YOU have a difficult time swallowing YOUR pride when you find out (first hand --a word you frequently use) that it is not what I meant.
Nope. It took you a long time to realize what I was getting at. Now, that you've acknowledged, albeit in somewhat of an indirect manner that you didnt' witness what you claim, that's fine.
quote:
Understand first hand? Straight from me. Yet you continue to badger as you do others, all while intermittently resorting to attempts to personally attack, as you have in the past.
Nope, this would have ended a long time ago had you decided not to try to prove me wrong as if I was arguing that what you claimed wasn't happening back then.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News