- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lsu talent
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:12 pm to cj2002
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:12 pm to cj2002
quote:
with the talent we have in state and a DC just as we have now, our defense stays as good as it is.
You're acting like the defense and offensive sides of the ball play in a vacuum. What happens on one side absolutely effects the other side of the ball. That doesn't mean LSU would completely suck on D, but without time to rest and a ball control offense, the ability of the D to sustain their play would drop, it's just a fact.
3
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:13 pm to drizztiger
quote:
I'm saying Malzahn was scoffed at by this same board because the board is collectively stupid. Same thing with Patterson. You have to be able to see potential in people regardless if it's coaching or business or life. It's a testament to the Rantards that they can't even fathom it.
So what were your thoughts on Miles when he won the SEC West twice in 3 years, three 11+ win seasons, and won a National championship his first 3 years?
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:14 pm to cj2002
No it's not. There's a reason you don't see top defensive coordinators attached with these HUNH offensives. That style of offensive football isn't complimentary to good defense. Everyone keeps saying this shite, but none of yall can name a HUNH offense that has an outstanding defense with it or outstanding defensive coordinator. Plus, going up against that style of offense everyday at practice makes defenses soft. I guess things are just supposed to be different because we would be talking about LSU. 
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 10:15 pm
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:14 pm to OldManRiver
quote:
You're acting like the defense and offensive sides of the ball play in a vacuum. What happens on one side absolutely effects the other side of the ball. That doesn't mean LSU would completely suck on D, but without time to rest and a ball control offense, the ability of the D to sustain their play would drop, it's just a fact.
This guy gets it. It's called having an identity. You're either power, or you're finesse. It's impossible to be both.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:16 pm to OldManRiver
quote:
You're acting like the defense and offensive sides of the ball play in a vacuum. What happens on one side absolutely effects the other side of the ball. That doesn't mean LSU would completely suck on D, but without time to rest and a ball control offense, the ability of the D to sustain their play would drop, it's just a fact.
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:17 pm to RB10
I'd bet $100 you had to look up "mutually exclusive" to see what it meant then still didn't understand.
Especially in the context - another one that will get you - that Miles had shitty defenses at OSU. Yet any other coach couldn't possibly come into LSU and have a offensive mind AND a defense as well.
I imagine the hamster turning the wheel in your head, "we can't have offense AND defense. Impossible."
Especially in the context - another one that will get you - that Miles had shitty defenses at OSU. Yet any other coach couldn't possibly come into LSU and have a offensive mind AND a defense as well.
I imagine the hamster turning the wheel in your head, "we can't have offense AND defense. Impossible."
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:19 pm to drizztiger
quote:
I'd bet $100 you had to look up "mutually exclusive" to see what it meant then still didn't understand.
Especially in the context - another one that will get you - that Miles had shitty defenses at OSU. Yet any other coach couldn't possibly come into LSU and have a offensive mind AND a defense as well.
I imagine the hamster turning the wheel in your head, "we can't have offense AND defense. Impossible."
More deflection? Having trouble finding that offensive guru that was able to keep teams under 30 points per game?
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:20 pm to OldManRiver
I disagree from the stand point the D would be jacked to play knowing the offense was lighting up the scoreboard.
now I think they get demoralized if the give up more then 20, because most likely the offense play calling cant keep up.
now I think they get demoralized if the give up more then 20, because most likely the offense play calling cant keep up.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:21 pm to drizztiger
quote:
we can't have offense AND defense. Impossible
No one is saying this. The point is being made that it's hard to have a good defensive unit running HUNH offense. Every fan wants better offensive production at LSU. Anybody saying otherwise is lying. Better offensive production can be accomplished without having to go to a HUNH offense.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:21 pm to drizztiger
quote:
I imagine the hamster turning the wheel in your head, "we can't have offense AND defense. Impossible."
Of course we can have offense and defense, that wasn't the point of the thread. The wide open, HUHN teams are the ones that traditionally struggle to field competent defenses. But there are many other ways to have good offenses that score points without trying to run 90 plays a game.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:22 pm to cj2002
quote:
I disagree from the stand point the D would be jacked to play knowing the offense was lighting up the scoreboard
It's hard to be jacked when you're winded because your offense doesn't value time of possession.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:23 pm to RB10
quote:I'm deflecting? You haven't answered one fricking thing.
More deflection? Having trouble finding that offensive guru that was able to keep teams under 30 points per game?
Easy answer is Jimbo bro if you really need one.
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:24 pm to BigBrod81
quote:That's exactly what RB10 is saying. Exactly.
No one is saying this.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:25 pm to drizztiger
quote:
I'm deflecting? You have answered one fricking thing.
Yes you are. All I'm asking for is one team that runs HUNH and has a dominant defense. Just one.
quote:
Easy answer is Jimbo bro if you really need one.
Lol no. Jimbo doesn't run a HUNH. Try again.
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 10:27 pm
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:25 pm to drizztiger
quote:lol no
Easy answer is Jimbo bro if you really need one.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:26 pm to drizztiger
quote:
That's exactly what RB10 is saying. Exactly.
Wrong.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:27 pm to drizztiger
quote:
Easy answer is Jimbo bro if you really need one.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:27 pm to drizztiger
Auburn has given up 48 points and is losing by double digits right now.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:28 pm to BigBrod81
I am not even speaking to the hurry up aspect.
I like the way the offense is opened up and the defense cant just key on the hand off.
I like the way the offense is opened up and the defense cant just key on the hand off.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:29 pm to studentsect
quote:Oops...
Auburn has given up 48 points and is losing by double digits right now.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News