Started By
Message

re: LSU-OM Stats - What Stands Out to You?

Posted on 9/21/26 at 10:56 am to
Posted by Tiger on the Rag
Cattle Gap Egypt
Member since Jan 2018
7901 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 10:56 am to
quote:

A game like this usually turns on no more than a half dozen plays if that. Flip those and we're all happy campers.



If we complete a few more passes and not have 4 to 5 passes batted down every game, it's a win.
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
49476 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 11:26 am to
Game of inches
Posted by Demonbengal
Ruston
Member since May 2015
6095 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 11:33 am to
I really felt we would give up scores, but would hold them to settling for fg’s more often. I thought OM would score 20 having to settle for as many fg’s as td’s. We should have held to the fg right before half. If that would have happened, and we score first in second half, we are only down 6 with as bad as we played in the first half.
Posted by Papa Tigah
TIGER ISLAND, LA
Member since Sep 2007
20863 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 11:38 am to
Posted by WaterLink
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
21111 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 11:55 am to
quote:

- Passing yds (158 vs 363)


This was the difference. They have a QB with a fast processor and will pull the trigger fast if he sees an opening, he had no issues taking the 5 yard route quickly with the soft zones we were giving him. And there were times that nobody was open initially and he did get under pressure, he used his legs to buy time but kept his eyes downfield until he found an open man. He threw balls into really tight windows that most QBs at this level are not going to be able to make. He played a hell of a game

Leavitt just couldn't do any of that consistently. Too often it takes him longer to process what he's seeing, his timing from recognizing an open guy to actually making the throw is slow, results in throws that are late and off the mark. And he has no patience to keep his eyes downfield, if it's not there initially he pulls the ball down and tries to take off. The frustrating thing is that he has the physical ability to be really good, you'll see him throw some great passes at times and you just wish you could get that from him more consistently. That TD throw to Watkins on 3rd down to cut the lead to 3 was an absolute dime, you can't make that throw any better than he did. He has it in him to be really good, so I'm not ready to completely give up on him yet like it seems that some are. We just have to hope he continues to improve, and gets better timing and chemistry with the rest of the offense and the game slows down for him.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
36758 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 11:59 am to
quote:

I don’t think this was quite as it appeared. I could tell our DL, particular edge guys, were so controlled with their rush approach to emphasize keeping him in the pocket as much as possible. I think when an end is basically forced to cut his approach in half it makes a pretty big difference.


That is true. But it also highlights what was evident from even before the season started, LSU's DTs are very average. The true freshman may be very good in time. But when you are starting and relying quite a bit on true freshmen, particularly now where players are "older" than ever before, that's telling that LSU doesn't really have any great veteran players at that spot.

It's quite reasonable to have your edge rushers take a bit of a contain approach to keep from opening big running lanes for a mobile QB. But when your interior DL gets zero push up the middle the QB is comfortable in the pocket
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram