
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU-OM Stats - What Stands Out to You?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 10:56 am to AlwysATgr
Posted on 9/21/26 at 10:56 am to AlwysATgr
quote:
A game like this usually turns on no more than a half dozen plays if that. Flip those and we're all happy campers.
If we complete a few more passes and not have 4 to 5 passes batted down every game, it's a win.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 11:33 am to AlwysATgr
I really felt we would give up scores, but would hold them to settling for fg’s more often. I thought OM would score 20 having to settle for as many fg’s as td’s. We should have held to the fg right before half. If that would have happened, and we score first in second half, we are only down 6 with as bad as we played in the first half.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 11:55 am to AlwysATgr
quote:
- Passing yds (158 vs 363)
This was the difference. They have a QB with a fast processor and will pull the trigger fast if he sees an opening, he had no issues taking the 5 yard route quickly with the soft zones we were giving him. And there were times that nobody was open initially and he did get under pressure, he used his legs to buy time but kept his eyes downfield until he found an open man. He threw balls into really tight windows that most QBs at this level are not going to be able to make. He played a hell of a game
Leavitt just couldn't do any of that consistently. Too often it takes him longer to process what he's seeing, his timing from recognizing an open guy to actually making the throw is slow, results in throws that are late and off the mark. And he has no patience to keep his eyes downfield, if it's not there initially he pulls the ball down and tries to take off. The frustrating thing is that he has the physical ability to be really good, you'll see him throw some great passes at times and you just wish you could get that from him more consistently. That TD throw to Watkins on 3rd down to cut the lead to 3 was an absolute dime, you can't make that throw any better than he did. He has it in him to be really good, so I'm not ready to completely give up on him yet like it seems that some are. We just have to hope he continues to improve, and gets better timing and chemistry with the rest of the offense and the game slows down for him.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 11:59 am to lob1284
quote:
I don’t think this was quite as it appeared. I could tell our DL, particular edge guys, were so controlled with their rush approach to emphasize keeping him in the pocket as much as possible. I think when an end is basically forced to cut his approach in half it makes a pretty big difference.
That is true. But it also highlights what was evident from even before the season started, LSU's DTs are very average. The true freshman may be very good in time. But when you are starting and relying quite a bit on true freshmen, particularly now where players are "older" than ever before, that's telling that LSU doesn't really have any great veteran players at that spot.
It's quite reasonable to have your edge rushers take a bit of a contain approach to keep from opening big running lanes for a mobile QB. But when your interior DL gets zero push up the middle the QB is comfortable in the pocket

Popular
Back to top

0











