Started By
Message

re: LSU is not a rebuild. LSU hired O to avoid a rebuild.

Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:02 am to
Posted by timlan2057
In the Shadow of Tiger Stadium
Member since Sep 2005
17343 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:02 am to
Well, they're coming out of the woodwork.

Summarizing succinctly all the bullshite from the O pumpers, some other posters and I have been proven right.

A significant part of this fan base--and a significant part of the BOS-- is okay with mediocrity, because now "we gots a corch dat tawks lak us, sha!"

To them, it was never about Miles.

And that weasel Alleva couldn't be happier because his job is more secure, when his seat should be on fire.

Alleva is doing his best to lower the bar of expectations, and with the number of idiots in this fan base, he's succeeding.
This post was edited on 9/19/17 at 9:06 am
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25526 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:03 am to
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Alleva better hope Ed works out for him. If he doesn't, it will mean the end of his gravy train as AD.
Posted by Fus0623
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2015
89647 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Dumb thread is really dumb. No matter how you slice it, LSU has a new head coach and new offense coordinator. Whether CEO was already in the program or served as interim is irrelevant. Promote a new guy to HC and OC in ANY program and there will be "rebuilding"

So you saying Oklahoma is in a rebuild?
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
280971 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:07 am to
quote:

o anyone who is arguing for patience or saying that we have to wait for "O to get his guys in" are arguing against O, because they are showing why he was either too stupid to know there would be a rebuild


Eh, everyone with a brain knew this would be a transition year, no matter who we hired.

The O haters used this against him, saying the standard should always be 10 wins blah blah blah. He has been set up to fail from the start because they said it can't be a rebuild when they damn well knew it would be at least a year before he could replenish the talent we lost in the offseason.

it's not really about getting "his guys" in. Just needs to keep building. This team isn't very good and that would be for any coach here
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
15052 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:07 am to
quote:

LSU is not a rebuild. LSU hired O to avoid a rebuild.
True dat.

Is it a rebuild if just bringing the young one's along is the issue? I say no.

However, I consider it a failure at this point they are not further along. Really disappointed in Aranda (therefore by default CEO). If he feels he has to limit his scheming that much due to freshmen not being ready we are "behind schedule" to use a euphemism.

But to reiterate-
A) Yes, CEO was to avoid a rebuild, no doubt... primary objective of the hire.

B) If it turns out that getting freshmen SEC ready was the key, it wasn't a rebuild. More of a refit, which is fine.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
159149 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:08 am to
Posted by Fanofages
Denham Springs,La.
Member since Jun 2013
676 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:08 am to
Nailed it!!!!!
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25526 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:09 am to
quote:

Lester Earl


quote:

Any coach would get beat by 30 against the conference's perennial cellar dweller.


I beg to differ.
This post was edited on 9/19/17 at 9:14 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432420 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:09 am to
quote:

The O haters used this against him, saying the standard should always be 10 wins blah blah blah.

THAT was his sales pitch to Alleva

don't try to criticize people for making O live up to his own words

quote:

He has been set up to fail from the start because they said it can't be a rebuild when they damn well knew it would be at least a year before he could replenish the talent we lost in the offseason.

he set himself up to fail, then. again, that's on O

quote:

This team isn't very good and that would be for any coach here

then what is the logical point to hire a coach for continuity?
Posted by TigerFan4040
Member since Sep 2013
4386 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:11 am to
quote:


Your making the argument that because 3 losses a year wouldn't be acceptable, it's okay that we hired a guy that's going to give us 5 or 6 per year?


Correct in the SECW today, 3 losses should not be acceptable for a program who wants to be considered elite. I never said it was okay to have 5 losses with CEO... waat?
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25526 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:13 am to
If "the team isn't very good" like Lester posits, there is no factual predicate for hiring O. If a full rebuild was necessary, O's candidacy doesn't have a prayer. His pitch was based on keeping things going, keeping recruiting together, and the players wanting him which was stupid. In reality it was based on Jimbo and Herman not working out so Alleva hired the easiest candidate quickly so he could "win" the narrative Thanksgiving week. Good job, a-hole.
This post was edited on 9/19/17 at 9:15 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432420 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:16 am to
quote:

If "the team isn't very good" like Lester posits, there is no factual predicate for hiring O

exactly

if LSU is a legit rebuild (and i'm not even arguing that it's not, objectively), then we needed somebody to come in, tear down the culture, team, schemes, mentality, etc and actually rebuild the program

we hired O to AVOID the rebuild. if it's a rebuild, then O is truly a terrible hire (b/c what kind of continuity are we maintaining? mediocrity?). if it's not a rebuild, then O has already failed this year. you don't get it both ways

do people who support O and also believe that LSU is a rebuild believe that O is the right coach to rebuild LSU? based on what?
Posted by Skillet
Member since Aug 2006
109967 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:16 am to
quote:

our AD decided he wasn't going to do an actual coaching search and went with the laziest choice in modern college football.


who should we have hired, and why would this person automatically be worlds better than o at lsu?


quote:

so anyone who is arguing for patience or saying that we have to wait for "O to get his guys in" are arguing against O, because they are showing why he was either too stupid to know there would be a rebuild or that he lied to our AD



that could all be true, but it's just one bad game that went terribly wrong. maybe we'll fix a lot of what's wrong the next couple of games and atone for last years florida debacle.

O will get this season and next season for sure. If he can't do it, we'll move on, and our new AD will easily be able to bring 70 year old Saban back, right?

This post was edited on 9/19/17 at 9:18 am
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
280971 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:18 am to
A perennial cellar dweller with the best player in the sec and a great offensive coach? Ok guy.

Funny people were laughing at the notion of us going after dan Mullen in the offseason
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25526 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:19 am to
Beating Ed Orgeron's arse doesn't make you a great candidate. If that was the barometer, we should have just signed up Houston Nutt and gotten it over with.
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
128114 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Skillet

You are clearly not a very informed fan to legitimately question who would be better than O.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
280971 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:22 am to
quote:

then what is the logical point to hire a coach for continuity?


A pitch for continuity does not have to equate to winning every game. You have complained about Miles' downward trajectory for fricking years jake. at what point does this trajectory show its head? frick man

We botched 2016 with championship talent. Now all that talent is gone. We're young & the returning players are not great. Analyze the damn roster &situation instead of just reading the headlines,
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432420 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:22 am to
quote:

who should we have hired,

assuming we're a legit rebuild? Mullen, Fleck, Taggert, or Aranda

if we wanted to maintain that 2-4 loss dynamic, there are a slew of coaches who are coaching BCS-conference teams who don't have the abysmal record that O does as HC. guys like Larry Fedora and that class/level of coach



Posted by slapahoe
USA
Member since Sep 2009
7450 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:22 am to
quote:

That why Saban has been able to go through coordinators left and right but still keep that machine running?
so you want to compare Saban to a coach who is something like 7-24 in the SEC? Ok gotcha
Posted by Skillet
Member since Aug 2006
109967 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Funny people were laughing at the notion of us going after dan Mullen in the offseason



I mentioned that yesterday. LSU fan base would have have totally lost it had Alleva went after Mullen.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 39
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 39Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram