- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/18/19 at 1:56 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
So again, 12-2 = 12-2, but hey we won a national title and finished #1 with one of those. But, same thing in the end.
I already covered why that's not an equal comparison, but I bet you'll just ignore it for a second time.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 1:57 pm to TabledTiger
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
About right from this administrations plan to destroy our school’s athletic program.
About right from this administrations plan to destroy our school’s athletic program.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 1:57 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
I already covered why that's not an equal comparison, but I bet you'll just ignore it for a second time.
You're running yourself in circles. Stop backpedaling and take a side. Either record = record no matter what or maybe, just maybe, each year is actually different from one another. 12-2 one year, could be a lot different of a final outcome than 12-2 in another (reality).
This post was edited on 3/18/19 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 3/18/19 at 1:59 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
You're running yourself in circles.
Not at all. I very clearly explained why that scenario doesn't apply, and you don't like it.
quote:
s. Stop backpedaling and take a side
I haven't changed my argument at all. You're not very good at reading.
quote:
Either record = record no matter what or maybe, just maybe, each year is actually different from one another.
Go back and read and see if you can figure it out. Maybe the third time will be the charm.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:00 pm to LSURep864
People have to look past the 10 million dollar buyout. That is just if he is fired after 2019 which isn’t happening no matter how much anybody hates O.
I’m not a math whiz or a smart man in general but it looks like the buyout will go down to 7.5 million after 2020 season then 4 million every year after that under the current contract.
Those numbers aren’t that bad considering the only way he is getting fired after 2020 is if they go 6-6 or 7-5 the next two seasons.
I’m not a math whiz or a smart man in general but it looks like the buyout will go down to 7.5 million after 2020 season then 4 million every year after that under the current contract.
Those numbers aren’t that bad considering the only way he is getting fired after 2020 is if they go 6-6 or 7-5 the next two seasons.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:00 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
They absolutely do, and every year is different one to the next. This year's schedule is not next year's schedule. This year's outcomes for everyone can be viewed at differently than next year's outcomes.
The results on the field in 2018 resulted in a final ranking of #6/#7. The results on the field in 2015 resulted in a final ranking of #16/#17.
In 2018 we played an undefeated team in the Fiesta Bowl.
In 2015 we played a crap Texas Tech team with zero defense.
We got 5 home SEC games in 2015 because of a hurricane.
We did NOT get 5 home SEC games in 2018.
These are fairly noticeable differences to anyone who follows college football.
I follow College Football more than most on this site.
LSU had nearly the same strength of schedule in 15 as they did in 18. The only difference is that UCF propped the 18 schedule up.
That Texas Tech team would have beaten that UCF team
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:01 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Not at all. I very clearly explained why that scenario doesn't apply, and you don't like it.
Because your explanation lines up exactly with what I prescribed, that each year is different and the same record year over year results in different outcomes. Then you go full-retard by saying record = record regardless which completely contradicts yourself.
quote:Yes, you have, you're just not intelligent enough to realize it.
I haven't changed my argument at all.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:01 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Because your explanation lines up exactly with what I prescribed
The frick it does.
quote:
Then you go full-retard by saying record = record regardless which completely contradicts yourself.
If you say so
quote:
es, you have, you're just not intelligent enough to realize it.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:01 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
No one expects you to be objective.
You saying we weren't actually the 6th/7th best team last year isn't objective either bud
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:02 pm to lsufball19
quote:
You saying we weren't actually the 6th/7th best team last year isn't objective either bud
We were ranked that, sure. But we lost to teams we finished ranked behind, so do you really think we were the 6th best team in the country?
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:03 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:
LSU had nearly the same strength of schedule in 15 as they did in 18. The only difference is that UCF propped the 18 schedule up.
Big differences in Texas Tech vs. UCF and 5 SEC home games vs. 4.
Imagine if we got Florida at home in 2018, could have made the difference in 11-2 and 10-3. You cannot ignore that.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:03 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:
Non objectively, LSU finished tied with Kentucky for 5th in conference.
5 sec teams finished in the top 12
6 in the top 16
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:04 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Imagine if we got Florida at home in 2018
We lose like we did in '16?
quote:
could have made the difference in 11-2 and 10-3. You cannot ignore that.
Can we do this for the Auburn game too? Or the bowl game? Or do you only do hypotheticals that add wins?
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:05 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
The frick it does.
On one hand you state record = record regardless of year.
Then on another state, well but if you win something xyz it's different.
Then you claim 10-3 = 10-3 despite the fact the outcomes of each were quite different.
So again, which is it? You cant say record=record then just contradict yourself and say it doesnt unless you want to claim only 1 or 2 things change that. A season is judged beyond just SEC finish/national title. Rankings are a pretty good indication of where you stack up nationally. What bowl you get as well is a pretty solid indicator.
This post was edited on 3/18/19 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:06 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Can we do this for the Auburn game too? Or the bowl game? Or do you only do hypotheticals that add wins?
I'm making apples to apples here since that's apparently all you want to do. Is 5 SEC home games an advantage or not?
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:06 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
On one hand you state record = record regardless of year.
Then on another state, well but if you win something xyz it's different.
If you're too stupid to see who that's not equivalent, that's on you. We are comparing years that we did not win our division. Stop trying to change the discussion.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:06 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
We were ranked that, sure. But we lost to teams we finished ranked behind, so do you really think we were the 6th best team in the country?
Lolol. going by that logic, any team that ever loses to teams ranked behind them should never be ranked higher than them regardless of what else happens.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:06 pm to thunderbird1100
Welp... I guess we're done talking about the actual contract.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 2:07 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
I'm making apples to apples here since that's apparently all you want to do. Is 5 SEC home games an advantage or not?
A slight one, sure. Not having Brandon Harris seems like an advantage too.
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News