- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LSU 3, Bama 0 / Bama 3, LSU 0
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:04 pm
I was thinking about the thread someone posted a few days ago about the 1970 LSU / Notre Dame game that the Irish won 3-0 in a defensive struggle. If the Nov. 5 game ends as a 3-0, or even 6-3 final score, I think it may help the chances of a rematch in the BCSNC. I think a lot of voters in the polls would be more inclined to put LSU and Bama in a position to force a rematch with a low scoring defensive slugfest.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
8
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:07 pm to doublecutter
Not going to be a total of 3 points.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:08 pm to doublecutter
If LSU loses by 3 no matter what the score and Stanford and okie st. lose we are in
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:08 pm to doublecutter
Have already sat thru a LSU-Alabama 3-0 game. It was a little wet that night....lol
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:09 pm to doublecutter
Well I don't know. The media can be stupid.
I've seen them say before in games that "if this game is a low scoring game I'll probably drop X in the polls"
As if a low scoring defensive struggle somehow means that both teams suck
I've seen them say before in games that "if this game is a low scoring game I'll probably drop X in the polls"
As if a low scoring defensive struggle somehow means that both teams suck
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:13 pm to doublecutter
There should not be a rematch regardless of who wins. If you don't win your division you shouldn't be in the championship game. It would suck if LSU lost 3-0 and that was it. But that's how stuff works.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:13 pm to LC412000
Yes it was rained most of the night.Long time ago.lol
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:17 pm to doublecutter
Precedent has been set. Tigers lost 3-0 to Bama in 1979. Same year as the USC epic match up. Pretty awesome home schedule that year.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:18 pm to doublecutter
The ND game in 1970 was a classic. I remember we were at Six Flags in Houston, TX that Sat. and we stayed in the hotel room for the entire game and listened on the radio!
I think modern day football w the spreading of the field and potential for big plays every down prohibits such low scoring games from happening very often - if EVER!
Besides, LSU's offense has been very productive and potent just like Alabama's. Expect double digit points by both teams no matter how good the defenses are. 17-14 LSU is good for me.
I think modern day football w the spreading of the field and potential for big plays every down prohibits such low scoring games from happening very often - if EVER!
Besides, LSU's offense has been very productive and potent just like Alabama's. Expect double digit points by both teams no matter how good the defenses are. 17-14 LSU is good for me.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:21 pm to LC412000
quote:
Have already sat thru a LSU-Alabama 3-0 game. It was a little wet that night....lol
Sleet and very cold as I recall!
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:25 pm to doublecutter
Honey Badger is sure to have a pick six off of AJ. 
Posted on 10/27/11 at 9:28 pm to TexTiga
If rainy conditions could be a sub 10 point game. Remember 2005 Auburn 10 - 9 and 2006 7 - 3. This may well be that kind of game but LSU has more explosive players and expect a 17 - 6 win by the Tigers.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News