- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:10 am to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:10 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
thats a lie too. Even in Ory's heavily edited videos, Gold truck acknowledges that he swerved to avoid the Charger. The officer simply asked him to make sure he included that in his written statement - which was a follow up to the verbal statement he already gave at the scene. Stop making shite up.
First mention of the charger was by the cop. Gold truck didn’t give a prior statement to any officer because he had already left the scene. Gold truck blamed the car behind him for the crash yet that isn’t in “his” statement that he refused to sign. Why would he refuse to sign his own statement, I wonder?
2
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:11 am to TeddyPadillac
There is a diagram in the video in the OP. Gold truck veers slightly right to avoid Lacy, leaving a small gap between southbound traffic and the gold truck still partially in the northbound lane. She veers left to go through that gap and clips the front left of the kia. Its not complicated. Its not some racist conspiracy. This isnt a movie about some intrepid lawyer fighting small town racial injustice. The dude fricked up and caused an accident. It happens.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:12 am to yaherrdme
quote:
This is not what the gold truck driver said. He said " I aint skid mark or nothing, I wasn't even going fast"..... even if you are going slow you can still brake "hard" or abruptly or unexpectedly because someone is coming head on at you, but he never says he did not brake hard, just that he did not leave skid marks because he was not traveling at a high rate of speed
It seems like you are agreeing that the woman should have had no problem stopping in her lane if not for her negligence.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:12 am to joe68
quote:
All the state police is doing now is covering their arse
That’s not “all” they’re doing. Maybe they’re releasing a video that proves realistic facts you can witness with your own eyes because that’s how investigations work. Crazy I know.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:12 am to RB10
quote:
This definitely helps you come across as more stable.
You’ve completely gone off the rails ITT. You really need to extract yourself from this conversation.
Yes. Between the people on here claiming Lacy was the devil and clearly as witness testimony proves crashed into both cars and fled scene, and others saying he has no blame at all, I am the one that is off the rails.
The cops, or at least one cop, did something extremely inappropriate and that is without question, by trying to steer the gold truck drivers statement.
Cops can make mistakes. They can also be shady as shite. The biggest question mark in all of this is from the behavior of that one officer.
Again, this is tragedy all around, but the point is it never should have happened in so many ways.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:13 am to LSBoosie
Meh....The man in the gold truck stated he didn't need to slam on his brakes, he pulled off to the side. His truck data box showed he was traveling 28 MPH before he pulled over.
The female driver of "vehicle 2"data box showed she was driving 49 MPH behind the gold truck and she initially was cited for following too close. That citation was done away with.
The female driver stated she was eating a bag of chips that were in her lap. If I had to guess, she was frustrated with how slow the man in the gold truck was driving and was on his bumper. A combination of her glancing down to get more chips and looking back up is when she noticed the gold truck pulling over and by the time she got her eyes back on the road, she more than likely she panicked and swerved into oncoming traffic.
Just some things to think about.
1. Why swerve into oncoming traffic (a head on collision) when she could've swerved off the road and impacted the gold truck which was a much better option.
2. You swerve left in this instance if you not paying attention to the road and don't know there's a vehicle in the opposite lane that's that close.
3. If she was going the speed limit, she could've safely pulled over just as the gold truck did.
100 yards isn't as far as people think on a road with cars traveling at excessive speed opposite each other. I can definitely understand how many put some blame on Lacy.
I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Both Lacy and the female driver of vehicle both were travelling at excessive speed and Lacy illegally passed several vehicles. Just as much as people think Lacy's actions are to blame for the crash, I find it hard for the female driver to bear no blame when she was speeding and distracted by eating a bag of Funyuns in her lap. There's a reason most states have passed a law against simply having a cell phone in your hand period! Too many drivers are distracted and it only takes a split second. I just don't get who swerves into on-coming traffic and thinks a head-on collision is a better option than crashing into the back of someone...unless you were distracted and didn't have your eyes on the road and by the time you looked up, you panicked!
The female driver of "vehicle 2"data box showed she was driving 49 MPH behind the gold truck and she initially was cited for following too close. That citation was done away with.
The female driver stated she was eating a bag of chips that were in her lap. If I had to guess, she was frustrated with how slow the man in the gold truck was driving and was on his bumper. A combination of her glancing down to get more chips and looking back up is when she noticed the gold truck pulling over and by the time she got her eyes back on the road, she more than likely she panicked and swerved into oncoming traffic.
Just some things to think about.
1. Why swerve into oncoming traffic (a head on collision) when she could've swerved off the road and impacted the gold truck which was a much better option.
2. You swerve left in this instance if you not paying attention to the road and don't know there's a vehicle in the opposite lane that's that close.
3. If she was going the speed limit, she could've safely pulled over just as the gold truck did.
100 yards isn't as far as people think on a road with cars traveling at excessive speed opposite each other. I can definitely understand how many put some blame on Lacy.
I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Both Lacy and the female driver of vehicle both were travelling at excessive speed and Lacy illegally passed several vehicles. Just as much as people think Lacy's actions are to blame for the crash, I find it hard for the female driver to bear no blame when she was speeding and distracted by eating a bag of Funyuns in her lap. There's a reason most states have passed a law against simply having a cell phone in your hand period! Too many drivers are distracted and it only takes a split second. I just don't get who swerves into on-coming traffic and thinks a head-on collision is a better option than crashing into the back of someone...unless you were distracted and didn't have your eyes on the road and by the time you looked up, you panicked!
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:13 am to LSBoosie
green charger was no where near the collision when it happend. The truck may have stopped seeing the charger coming. toward him,, but that doesn't mean the charger caused the accident from what I see on the video. The charge easily stopped short of the accident scene. the charger was guilty of reckless driving imo, but had nothing to do with the collision. Give him a ticket for reckless driving and that is all.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:13 am to Mickey Goldmill
you only saw a short clip of that exchange provided by the Lacy lawyer yet you've drawn all of these conclusions. Weird. And are you denying that gold truck acknowledges he swerved to avoid the charger in that same video?
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:14 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
It seems like you are agreeing that the woman should have had no problem stopping in her lane if not for her negligence.
The woman’s negligence is a completely separate issue. This may shock you, but more than one person can be at fault in a traffic accident.
Kyren’s actions caused a chain of events that resulted in an accident. The funyon lady’s action caused an accident. Both of these statements are true.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:15 am to zuluboudreaux
They can't prove that Lacey caused that crash due to speeding etc.--its heresay from the witnesses
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:16 am to QB
he was 150 feet from the collision moving at a high rate of speed. Ory doesnt even dispute this. That amounts to under 2 seconds of reaction time at the speeds being discussed.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:16 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
First mention of the charger was by the cop. Gold truck didn’t give a prior statement to any officer because he had already left the scene. Gold truck blamed the car behind him for the crash yet that isn’t in “his” statement that he refused to sign. Why would he refuse to sign his own statement, I wonder?
Have you never been in a situation where you needed to give a statement and wanted no part of it?
Some of y’all have experienced nothing in life but are always on the internet yappin’
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:17 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
you either dont understand the case, or your bias is rotting your brain
I don't understand the case, and I don't think you do, either. That's the point. There is conflicting information, and a lot of interjecting of opinions to say why people did what they did.
And my initial reaction to this video was that THIS video doesn't prove anything. Which is clearly doesn't. Other people are saying there are wider views that show something else, which I have yet to see anywhere, and I wonder why that isn't being shown here. Regardless, we have contradictory statements that don't really give me a clear explanation as to why the distracted driver did what she did. If the truck slowed down in reaction to Lacy, then fine. But why is she going too fast to slow down, not paying attention, and going into the wrong lane in response?
Has she been charged with anything, or is this all on Lacy? As far as I've heard, it's all been blamed on him, and that does not appear to be accurate.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:17 am to Geauxgurt
quote:There is really only one way to look at this.
Yet clearly also states it was the woman behind him’s fault for the crash and that he didn’t slam his brakes as she made up. So you are doing whatever part of the statement fits the corrupt cops narrative, right?
If Lacy isn’t passing those cars at a high rate of speed in a no passing zone does this accident happen? If your answer is no, he is at fault.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:18 am to Vacherie Saint
Not at all. Gold truck was able to avoid any crash because he was driving alert and under the speed limit unlike the lady behind him who was speeding and distracted.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:18 am to ell_13
Has anyone asked why we don’t have camera from dollar general?
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:18 am to Geauxgurt
quote:
Geauxgurt
Trying to paint this as some grand conspiracy is exactly what makes you look dumb, yet you keep trying to push that narrative.
Like I said, you really need to extract yourself from this conversation.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:19 am to saturncube21
quote:
They can't prove that Lacey caused that crash due to speeding etc.--its heresay from the witnesses
They can determine that the drivers in their rightful lane had less than 2 seconds to react to a sports car flying head on at them at 70 mph in a no passing zone. 2 seconds Isn’t a lot of time to weigh your options. You go with what you think works in that moment, and as with most split second decisions, their actions could be the wrong ones. Like in this case.
Both funyun girl and Lacy are responsible for this tragedy. If he would have been providing a safe environment for the oncoming cars and not breaking the law x3, this chain of events is likely to not ever take place.
Why would the truck need to slow down if he was driving the opposite way with nothing impeding his passage in HIS lane.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:20 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Not at all. Gold truck was able to avoid any crash because he was driving alert and under the speed limit unlike the lady behind him who was speeding and distracted.
So two people were driving recklessly. Kyren and the funyon lady.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:20 am to Metaloctopus
quote:
Why would someone crash because of someone well behind them?
Because the lady was following too closely and not paying attention so when the green truck braked she swerved into oncoming traffic to avoid him causing a fatal collision.
Page 8 of 60
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News