- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:21 pm to RB10
I'm starting to think they are the same poster. I mean... who honestly believes the can win an argument by repeating the same unfounded opinions over and over and over again?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:22 pm to RB10
quote:
the car behind it has to give it room to brake if the truck needs to brake. They failed to do so.
The only reason to believe this is to exonerate Lacy.
What? Im gonna be driving home in a few hours. Ill be pretty pissed if the car behind me drives so far up my arse that if something happens that causes me to have to brake or get off the road they plow over me.
3 seconds following distance +1 second per 10mph over 40mph. Use it.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:24 pm to sgallo3
quote:
What? Im gonna be driving home in a few hours. Ill be pretty pissed if the car behind me drives so far up my arse that if something happens that causes me
Hopefully no one is in your lane coming at a high rate of speed and you are forced to make a decision
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:24 pm to sgallo3
quote:
What? Im gonna be driving home in a few hours. Ill be pretty pissed if the car behind me drives so far up my arse that if something happens that causes me to have to brake or get off the road they plow over me.
More pissed than if a car passes 4 others in the wrong lane and comes head on at 70 MPH getting within a second of a collision? Ultimately forcing you off of the road.
If you're more scared of the tailgater you're a fricking idiot. Again, no offense.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:25 pm to bayou85
quote:
From what I gathered, the gold truck did not slam on its brakes and the 2nd car was too close to him so she swerved into oncoming lanes. The gold truck could have been weary of the charger, but the 2nd car couldn't have seen the charger due to the truck. it really seems like the lady wasn't paying attention and didn't want to go to jail.
Gathered from who? SammyTiger? LOL.
The gold truck did slam on his brakes. He said he didnt "skid". There is also no information supporting the idea that funyuns was subjectively "too close" or "couldnt see Lacy". In fact, she said at the scene that she saw the green charger. And literally everyone involved except the victim swerved regardless of distance to impact, so its really not a good argument if you want to assess her judgement in the moment.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:26 pm to jmh5724
quote:
Hopefully no one is in your lane coming at a high rate of speed and you are forced to make a decision
So the only time a car should give proper following distance is if someone else is driving dangerously?
What kinda sense does that make?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:27 pm to sgallo3
I need you to continue obsessively swearing up and down that funyuns is obviously to blame so we can get to 1500 posts! You are doing great!
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:30 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
There is also no information supporting the idea that funyuns was subjectively "too close"
The DA report forensic evidence does.
"The Kia Cadenza driver who hit Hall’s vehicle was following the gold pickup at 49.6 mph, just 0.5 seconds behind it, about 1.5 seconds before the crash."
At 50mph 5 car lengths would be 1.02 seconds behind.
Read More: Expert Questions Fatal Crash Investigation That Blamed Lacy | LINK
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:30 pm to RB10
quote:
Doesn’t matter.
it does.
The farther you’re removed from the actual collision the less culpable you are
You can cal it a chain reaction but if there are several breaks in the chain it doesn’t matter.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:31 pm to sgallo3
so why did the gold truck swerve nearly into a telephone pole before bailing off into a parking lot at 30MPH? 92 yards from any potential hazard?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:32 pm to Vacherie Saint
To be safe...
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:32 pm to sgallo3
quote:
At 50mph 5 car lengths would be 1.02 seconds behind.
Broooo, that's not the law though. How many times!?!??!?!
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:33 pm to sgallo3
The fact that you are ok with people driving at high speeds in the wrong lane is troubling. So as long as everyone else spaces themselves accordingly, you are totally fine with these idiots selfishly driving however they want? Let’s take it up a notch. What if Lacy was under the influence? Is it still the woman’s fault for following too closely? Let’s just abolish all traffic laws. According to Sgallo3 we only need one traffic law, everyone must be spaced accordingly. If that happens, there’s no chance of an accident ever happening no matter how bad the circumstances are. Why even have speed limits?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:35 pm to jmh5724
Im not fine with lacys actions. He was driving recklessly. She was driving recklessly and hit someone and killed them.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:36 pm to Geauxgurt
I agree with your take and I don’t think Lacy’s actions were the main reason for the collision. I think that the charges would have been thrown out or reduced for sure. I do wonder if every person charged with a crime, legit or not, that goes off the deep end are we gonna hold law enforcement liable. His defense team should have stressed to him to hang in there. I do think social media beating up on the kid was a major factor.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:37 pm to sgallo3
Perfect. So if funyun's judgement/reflex was to swerve rather than slam on her brakes "to be safe" for whatever reasons she had, than its no different.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:37 pm to sgallo3
quote:OK Boomer.
3 seconds following distance +1 second per 10mph over 40mph. Use it.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:38 pm to sgallo3
Of course you are. You wont stfu up about how someone else's at fault.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:39 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
it does.
The farther you’re removed from the actual collision the less culpable you are
You can cal it a chain reaction but if there are several breaks in the chain it doesn’t matter.
How far removed is driving in the wrong lane less than 2 seconds before the crash?
Doesn’t seem very far removed to me
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 1:43 pm
Page 52 of 60
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News