- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:07 pm to Chicken
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:07 pm to Chicken
quote:
it is quite possible...by the time the cop talked to her to get her statement, she had likely heard all the people talking about Lacy's vehicle and she possibly used that to her advantage.
Quite possible doesn’t fly scooter
1
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:08 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Wait so if green car wasnt coming she wouldve avoided the wreck? Was she gonna teleport through the car she hit or the gold truck?
If green car wasn’t coming at them what reason would any of them have had to brake or swerve. I’ll ask again for you, if Lacy isn’t on the road that day, does that wreck still happen? You trying to say that those two drivers were predestined to brake and swerve regardless of anything else happening at that moment?
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:09 pm to RB10
quote:
If green car was coming gold truck drives through the area without braking and pulling off the road. Funyuns never swerves. Kia never dies.
Gold Truck is allowed to brake. Funyons has to give enough room to avoid hitting him if he decides to brake, just like the car behind you at the red light.
If Gold Truck is braking to turn into whatever that building was, she would've still hit him or the other car. Thats why her driving is to blame.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:10 pm to RB10
quote:
Guess who’s insurance had to pay for damages to 4 vehicles on top of their own?
the one coming in hot, #5
IN the insurance world which ever car hit yours is at fault...even though they are just sitting there at a light or in traffic
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:11 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Gold Truck is allowed to brake. Funyons has to give enough room to avoid hitting him if he decides to brake, just like the car behind you at the red light.
So? How does this affect Lacy’s actions?
You can’t separate the two, which tells me a lot about you.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:13 pm to RB10
He passed three cars AND a large semi trailer at high speed, but yes.
Essentially, all parties have an defensive/evasive predicate to their actions.... Except Lacy. He willfully and consciously violated several traffics laws and by the preponderance of evidence was the first link in the chain of events. Therefore, he will bear the lions share of the liability.
Essentially, all parties have an defensive/evasive predicate to their actions.... Except Lacy. He willfully and consciously violated several traffics laws and by the preponderance of evidence was the first link in the chain of events. Therefore, he will bear the lions share of the liability.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:13 pm to RB10
I mean, no one knows if she lied or not except her… She obviously gets some blame in this whole thing…
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:13 pm to RB10
quote:
If Gold Truck is braking to turn into whatever that building was, she would've still hit him or the other car. Thats why her driving is to blame.
Yeah, this is what’s called conjecture. You THINK that’s what would have happened. Issue is no one gives a shite what you think.
Here’s what we know happened:
Lacy Sped past 4 vehicles at a dangers place breaking several laws. Lacy’s actions caused the truck to brake. The truck braking caused the lady to swerve. The lady swerving caused the wreck.
Again, no one gives a shite what you THINK could have happened. Do try and wrap your nugget around that.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:14 pm to Chicken
quote:
I mean, no one knows if she lied or not except her… She obviously gets some blame in this whole thing…
Without question. My issue is with people trying to say Lacy deserves none.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:15 pm to sgallo3
quote:
The math doesnt lie Lacy at 80mph and 270 feet has about 2.5 seconds to react. The woman at 50mph and 40 feet following distance has under 1 second. There's a reason he was able to stop without hitting anyone and she wasnt.
You’re not taking into account the closing speed of the oncoming car who admits he didn’t brake. Therefore your math and data is wrong. Lacy didn’t have 280 feet because gold truck was lessening that gap with every millisecond that passes
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:15 pm to RB10
quote:
Guess which car Lacy is in this wreck?
which car did he hit?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:15 pm to RB10
quote:
quote:
If Gold Truck is braking to turn into whatever that building was, she would've still hit him or the other car. Thats why her driving is to blame.
Yeah, this is what’s called conjecture. You THINK that’s what would have happened. Issue is no one gives a shite what you think.
How do you think the trucks reasoning for braking impacted the cars ability to brake?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:16 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
which car did he hit?
Doesn’t matter.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:16 pm to RB10
That’s his only argument which is the same as the lawyer’s and it is extremely weak, hence why the lawyer came out with his shitty chopped video to get public sentiment flaring because he knows his weak shite gets dismissed in court.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:16 pm to sgallo3
quote:
How do you think the trucks reasoning for braking impacted the cars ability to brake?
Does
Not
Matter
Man you two are fricking dumb. No offense of course. The utter inability to comprehend simple cause and effect is frightening.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:18 pm to PurpNGold1985
You’re not taking into account the closing speed of the oncoming car who admits he didn’t brake.
who didn’t break?
who didn’t break?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:18 pm to RB10
You have that right. It does not matter why the truck was braking, the car behind it has to give it room to brake if the truck needs to brake. They failed to do so.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:18 pm to Chicken
I can buy that. I think she could have seen that Charger briefly coming toward them (I'm sure a neon green charger flying 70MPH in the wrong lane stuck out like dog balls), as the gold truck simultaneously bails off the road. Big cloud of dust, funyuns flying, she panics and swerved to avoid the truck, and never sees the victim. Witnesses come to her aid prior to LEO arriving and they all talk about what happened. Extremely plausible.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:19 pm to SammyTiger
brake*
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:19 pm to sgallo3
quote:
You have that right. It does not matter why the truck was braking, the car behind it has to give it room to brake if the truck needs to brake. They failed to do so.
The only reason to believe this is to exonerate Lacy.
No rational person would ever believe the reason the truck started to brake doesn’t matter.
Page 51 of 60
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News