Started By
Message

re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation

Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:24 am to
Posted by biggdogg
United States
Member since May 2008
1869 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:24 am to
The gold truck and lacy were able to come to a complete stop without any problems. Swerving through traffic at a high rate of speed and still able to stop completely without making contact with any vehicle. And the driver of the truck said prior to the accident she almost hit him.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50359 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:25 am to
quote:

No matter how reckless he may have been driving beforehand, the other two cars crashed well ahead of him. Lacy had no direct involvement in that collision and is innocent of causing it. Corruption at its finest


This is insanely ignorant.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
175432 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Honestly if I didn’t see it happen and if others had already stopped, I’m not stopping either.


Two things.
1. He saw it. Like honestly quit trying to spin shite.
2. He was literally maneuvering 5 seconds after the crash to escape. What are you expecting people to do in 5 seconds did.


He caused the accident.
Posted by BayouBaw84
Member since Oct 2016
3215 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Think of turning left on green at an intersection. You could successfully make a risky squeeze between traffic and someone drastically overreact to you and get into a wreck. Just because it was your action that ultimately "caused" the accident, doesn't necessarily make you at fault.
Are you really comparing turning left on a green light to passing 3 cars and an 18 wheeler in one of the most congested areas on that road between Chackbay and Thibodaux not to forget in a huge curve?
Posted by BayouBaw84
Member since Oct 2016
3215 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:32 am to
quote:

The gold truck and lacy were able to come to a complete stop without any problems. Swerving through traffic at a high rate of speed and still able to stop completely without making contact with any vehicle. And the driver of the truck said prior to the accident she almost hit him.
From the little information gathered I would assume this type of driving was normal for Lacy. He is driving a car built for that type of driving and with his experience doing it I’m not surprised he was able to avoid colliding with another vehicle. It was even stated in the LSP video that someone else had already phoned in that day to report erratic driving by a green dodge charger.
Posted by TeygerFan
Member since Dec 2016
549 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:35 am to
That's what sheeple get when blindly following the word of a sleezy lawyer. You get shite on with actual facts.
Posted by TeygerFan
Member since Dec 2016
549 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:36 am to
quote:

He was literally maneuvering 5 seconds after the crash to escape. What are you expecting people to do in 5 seconds did.


Eh, 5 seconds is generous. He never even came to a complete stop. Complete classless actions.
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
450 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:38 am to
I think the lesson learned here is to never trust an attorney at face value. Everyone just ran with it. Including myself.
Posted by gotiger
Delray Beach, FL
Member since Feb 2009
2946 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:40 am to
Playing devils advocate:

If one car slams on their brakes to avoid hitting someone in front of them and you hit them in the back because you weren’t paying attention or following too closely, who’s at fault? Is it the cars who slammed on their brakes or the car who actually hit someone?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
175432 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Eh, 5 seconds is generous.


maybe slightly. 4.25 seconds to 4.5 seconds is pretty much on cue to the timing of him realizing accident in front of him to kyren starting to weave into the oncoming lane.
Posted by PlaySomeHonk
Montegut La and Liberty MS
Member since Jan 2023
528 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:42 am to
Just a general comment….I’ve read many of the comments here and while there is some disagreement, there is (mostly) logic involved on both sides. I also read the WAFB Facebook post of the same video and many of those comments.

My take away is that the average IQ of the rant, while obviously not Rhoads Scholarship worthy, is probably at least twice that of the general public in South La.

I believe the LSP’s findings were legit, and will be confirmed by the Louisiana Attorney General’s independent investigation.
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
450 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:46 am to
It depends. Usually it’s the car who hits the car in front at fault, unless :
quote:

Sudden, unforeseeable stop by the lead vehicle: If Car A stopped abruptly without reason (e.g., no hazard ahead), it could share fault.

Mechanical issues: E.g., Car A’s brake lights not working, preventing Car B from seeing the stop. •

Lead vehicle’s negligence: E.g., Car A backing up into Car B or swerving erratically.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 11:48 am
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
2164 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:49 am to
Everyone here that is bashing the woman really needs to take a step back.

Imagine you are driving on a very busy two-lane highway. All of the sudden you look up, and someone is coming at you head on, clearly speeding and driving recklessly. You have less than three seconds to make a decision. Any decision you make is going to end up badly for you and others around you. The only person who won't be hurt is the person coming at you head on because they are going to swerve themselves into a nice safe spot while all hell breaks loose.

Now also imagine a bunch of idiots judging you before and after the fact that no matter what you do, it is YOU that is in the wrong and not the person that caused all of this.

This is what is happening now on this board after seeing and hearing the video.

People are judgmental assholes and would never want to be in the position this person was put in due to Lacy's negligence. The fact that he even called a lawyer after this tells you all you need to know.

This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 11:50 am
Posted by Lgrnwd
Member since Jan 2018
8228 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:50 am to
quote:

No matter how reckless he may have been driving beforehand, the other two cars crashed well ahead of him. Lacy had no direct involvement in that collision and is innocent of causing it. Corruption at its finest


Multiple eyewitnesses at the scene of the accident said otherwise. They all told the responding officer that the green Charger caused the accident. The officer on the scene didn't just decide to go after Kyren Lacey. He was told directly by multiple eyewitnesses that the green Charger caused the accident. So is it any wonder that the "driver of the green Charger" was the initial main suspect??

Now how the investigation was played out from that point going forward should be questioned. But the initial response from law enforcement of suspecting the green Charger as being responsible for the accident wasn't just pulled out of thin air. That was literally what mulitple eyewitnesses at the scene told law enforcement.
Posted by BayouBaw84
Member since Oct 2016
3215 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:51 am to
quote:

maybe slightly. 4.25 seconds to 4.5 seconds is pretty much on cue to the timing of him realizing accident in front of him to kyren starting to weave into the oncoming lane.
His call to his lawyer took slightly more time. Two things that indicate, not prove that he felt like he was in some way guilty.
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
450 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:53 am to
However:
quote:

Third-Party Negligence (Car C): Car C, driving in the wrong lane, is likely 100% at fault for initiating the hazard. Louisiana’s comparative fault system (La. Civ. Code Art. 2323) allows fault to be apportioned among all negligent parties. However, Car C’s role affects Car A and Car B’s liability indirectly.
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
4740 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:54 am to
quote:

quote:
Eh, 5 seconds is generous.


maybe slightly. 4.25 seconds to 4.5 seconds is pretty much on cue to the timing of him realizing accident in front of him to kyren starting to weave into the oncoming lane.
it is too generous. Lets say i have a bunch of yrs of experience in this area and I can tell you that based on the evidence , 72 yards is around 2.3 seconds roughly and a 100 yards is 3.3 seconds. KL although traveling behind at impact between 100 and 72 yards is pretty quick closing speed between wise 2.3 to 3.3 seconds was his distance behind the accident. 2.5 second is where I believe he was. If you know radar and distances/times behind vehicles in front of you then you would understand this isny a far distance especially when your traveling 55 mph or greater. Modern day semi trucl drivers have this equipment/technology on their trucks and see these distances and times behind another vehicle all day everyday.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 11:57 am
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
4171 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:55 am to
quote:

The person behind the gold truck swerving into the southbound lane to avoid running into the back of the truck


That's called following too close and she's to blame 100%. Cars in front of you are allowed to brake at will for whatever reason. Who's to say he wasn't overreacting?

Someone still should explain how there still was another vehicle in front of lacy the was NOT in the wreck.
If your gold truck theory is true, and he needed to super hard brake, why didn't Lacy rear end the car in front? Simple...because he wasn't that close to Lacy.

My hypothesis is the lady was distracted, texting or whatever, saw brake lights and swerved too aggressively.

You yourself admits there's a solid center line. Under NO conditions should she have swerved that way. It ILLEGAL. She could have went right if thats the case of necessity
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78099 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Third-Party Negligence (Car C): Car C, driving in the wrong lane, is likely 100% at fault for initiating the hazard. Louisiana’s comparative fault system (La. Civ. Code Art. 2323) allows fault to be apportioned among all negligent parties. However, Car C’s role affects Car A and Car B’s liability indirectly.


where did you get that answer?
Posted by zuluboudreaux
God’s country USA
Member since Jan 2008
1044 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:56 am to
quote:

The gold truck breaking to turn and the white car not paying attention caused the driver of the car to swerve into other lane to avoid rear-ending the gold truck. Nothing to do with green charger.


The green charger had everything to do with the Gold truck braking which caused the second sequence of events, which is the car swerving to avoid hitting the truck. The car driver does have responsibility for her actions if she was tailgating.

That does not release Lacy’s actions from being the initial spark that set the chain of events in action.
Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15 16 17 ... 60
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 60Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram