- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Les Miles on Elliot Porter today...
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
scholarships are 1-year contracts. there isn't this fine print or schools would get in serious trouble
Right. And you would know this how? The ability for the team to release a player because he got arrested would be just one thing that would be written out in this document. That's just one agreement. There's probably several other agreements that allow a team to release you including the case the Porter is in. These kind of release / firing conditions are on just about every contract for so many different jobs.
quote:
they're not, which is why porter was so shocked
Porter is shocked that Miles didn't mention that he was a candidate, not because something like this isn't mentioned in the contract. Once again, you don't know what all is involved in a Letter of Intent. Neither do I. However, more than likely, LSU has EVERY RIGHT to do what they did in this situation, therefore no lawsuit can be made. You're assuming a lot of stuff that you don't know on such a claim.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I know you're laughing.
you can't move it
a scholarship for the 2010-2011 season exists once in reality
porter had this scholarship promised to him until monday
now LSU says he doesn't have this scholarship
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:13 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
That's just not how it works. Sorry. I know it fits SFP's agenda. The FACT is, LSU will start paying his way in January if he shows up. Do you guys really not know what pulled means
what do you mean that's not how it works??
He can't play during the 2010-2011 football season, not for LSU at least. What are you talking about?
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:14 pm to kadillak
quote:
LSU has EVERY RIGHT to do what they did in this situation, therefore no lawsuit can be made.
no lawsuit doesn't mean this wasn't a dipshit move
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:16 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
That's just not how it works.
yes it is
quote:
Do you guys really not know what pulled means?
yes. it means you had a scholarship and then you didn't. like porter with the 2010-2011 season
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:17 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
I know you're laughing.
are you denying that a scholarship for the 2010-2011 fall LSU semester is not an individual, intangible item?
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:19 pm to tigerguy121
quote:
what do you mean that's not how it works??
This part: "He may get another offer for 2011-2012,"
There is no "may". No greyshirt is turned away come January.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:No.
are you denying that a scholarship for the 2010fall LSU semester is not an individual, intangible item?
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:21 pm to kadillak
quote:
LSU has EVERY RIGHT to do what they did in this situation,
no they don't
porter has not violated the terms of his LOI or scholarship in any way
quote:
you don't know what all is involved in a Letter of Intent.
it's not rocket science
here, i'll give you a basic rundown
LINK
quote:
therefore no lawsuit can be made
it can be, but it won't. CFB is a good ole boys club and doing something like suing schools is a huge no no
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:22 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
No.
then how can you argue he hasn't lost anything
he had an intangible item in his possession (the LSU scholarship for 2010-2011)
now he does not possess that item
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:28 pm to moneyg
quote:denial of the f up. Miles failed to communicate the possibility that someone would have to greyshirt if all the kids signed made it. End result is Porter is left in a bad situation
Denial of what? It was a bad situation. Do you think it was done intentionally?
quote:I care that a LA kid that shaved LSU in the side of his hair as a sign of how excited he was before he got to campus and worked out all summer was screwed over. Why wouldn't I? The fact that it was done bc of another patented LM's miscommunitcation isn't a surprise to anyone.
You don't care about Porter. You simply are excited to have something to bitch about Miles about.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
then how can you argue he hasn't lost anything
he had an intangible item in his possession (the LSU scholarship for 2010-2011)
The way I read it, if the school does not fulfill the offer of a scholarship then the LOI is then null and void.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:41 pm to Books
Books your an idiot 24 hrs is if he found out today the 4th camp starts tomorrow. if he found out yesterday he had at least 48 hours
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
no lawsuit doesn't mean this wasn't a dipshit move
I'm not talking about how ethical the situation is. I'm strictly debating the legality of what happened which SFP brought up.
quote:
no they don't
porter has not violated the terms of his LOI or scholarship in any way
I never said he did. He didn't have to violate anything for him to be eligible for the team to release him.
quote:
it's not rocket science
here, i'll give you a basic rundown
LINK
That's a very general run-down of the agreement. There's way more to the contract than that. You and I both know that for a fact. The article doesn't even mention the ability for a team to release a player for conduct problems during that time period, and we all know teams can/have done that in the past. That's one obvious aspect of a release that's not even mentioned in the article and it's a very well-known, and used aspect.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:47 pm to Books
if he would have WOWED the coaches during the summer he wouldn't have been asked to greyshirt
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:50 pm to 102362
quote:
if he would have WOWED the coaches during the summer he wouldn't have been asked to greyshirt
Most retarded post in this thread. Congrats.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:52 pm to Books
quote:
spin the horrid timing of telling the kid 24 hrs before he starts Fall practice after 3 months of busting his arse w/ his teammates after having been promised a full ride for the '10 season
This. It's complete bullshite.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 6:56 pm to TheBob
Why would you want someone that did the best over the summer to greyshirt? ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
Posted on 8/4/10 at 7:03 pm to 102362
quote:
Why would you want someone that did the best over the summer to greyshirt?
What?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)