
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Lane was impatient, DeBoer won with conservatism
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:14 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:14 am
In a game as defensive as this ended up being (until we handed Bama back-to-back 4th quarter possessions starting in the red zone), we just plain and simple got too aggressive when the offense was initially stalling.
1. The decision to attempt a 56 yard FG
While he did have the leg for it, that would have been Starzyk's career long by a few yards. Let him try FGs of that distance against LA Tech and McNeese, not against the #5 team in the country in a tie ballgame. Probably would have been safest to punt that one and let the defense continue gaining confidence with a 80-90 yard field. Instead, we gave Bama an extra 30 yards of field position to put the first TD of the game on the board.
2. 4th & 4 attempt from the 9
Down 10-3, offense is moving it well but has now stalled a few times. 3.5 minutes left in the 1st half, and we're getting the ball first in the 3rd quarter. Take your points and stay in the fight. 4th & 4 does not have a high enough probability of conversion when there's still 34 minutes left in the game.
3. 2nd & 19 at Bama 36 - Interception
The offense is once again driving, but Bama makes a big play and gets a sack. 30 seconds left in the 2nd quarter. Instead of accepting that it might be time to hit something underneath and work for a makeable field goal, we call a play to push it down the field, and Leavitt gets baited into an interception. Yes, Leavitt needs to do a better job of seeing the dropping linebacker, but Alabama was also willing to give us an underneath play to get in position for 3 points, and we opted for aggressive playcalling anyway.
4. 4th & 3 from Bama 36 - Turnover on Downs
Unlike the missed FG in the 2nd quarter, this would have been within Starzyk's career long range by a yard. 13 minutes left in the game down 17-13. This is definitely the most defendable decision of these 4 that I'm highlighting, but I would still say (as a Monday-morning quarterback) that the right move would have been to kick it when we had been struggling all day in short yardage situations.
Looking back, the issue was that we got aggressive early, and the tension just continued build as each tough situation arose, forcing Lane to lean on the aggressive side more and more as the game went along. We easily could have had 9 points at the half, and I don't believe Alabama would have drove the full length of the field had we punted instead of attempting the long field goal. We could have put our thumb on them in that 3rd quarter instead of playing catch up.
A lesson to be learned here in taking your medicine early when you're playing a defense of Bama's quality. Look at how Tennessee beat them: very very similar game flow, but Tennessee kicked 4 field goals in the 1st half and were then able to blow it open in the 2nd half because Heupel stayed patient in the 1st half.
1. The decision to attempt a 56 yard FG
While he did have the leg for it, that would have been Starzyk's career long by a few yards. Let him try FGs of that distance against LA Tech and McNeese, not against the #5 team in the country in a tie ballgame. Probably would have been safest to punt that one and let the defense continue gaining confidence with a 80-90 yard field. Instead, we gave Bama an extra 30 yards of field position to put the first TD of the game on the board.
2. 4th & 4 attempt from the 9
Down 10-3, offense is moving it well but has now stalled a few times. 3.5 minutes left in the 1st half, and we're getting the ball first in the 3rd quarter. Take your points and stay in the fight. 4th & 4 does not have a high enough probability of conversion when there's still 34 minutes left in the game.
3. 2nd & 19 at Bama 36 - Interception
The offense is once again driving, but Bama makes a big play and gets a sack. 30 seconds left in the 2nd quarter. Instead of accepting that it might be time to hit something underneath and work for a makeable field goal, we call a play to push it down the field, and Leavitt gets baited into an interception. Yes, Leavitt needs to do a better job of seeing the dropping linebacker, but Alabama was also willing to give us an underneath play to get in position for 3 points, and we opted for aggressive playcalling anyway.
4. 4th & 3 from Bama 36 - Turnover on Downs
Unlike the missed FG in the 2nd quarter, this would have been within Starzyk's career long range by a yard. 13 minutes left in the game down 17-13. This is definitely the most defendable decision of these 4 that I'm highlighting, but I would still say (as a Monday-morning quarterback) that the right move would have been to kick it when we had been struggling all day in short yardage situations.
Looking back, the issue was that we got aggressive early, and the tension just continued build as each tough situation arose, forcing Lane to lean on the aggressive side more and more as the game went along. We easily could have had 9 points at the half, and I don't believe Alabama would have drove the full length of the field had we punted instead of attempting the long field goal. We could have put our thumb on them in that 3rd quarter instead of playing catch up.
A lesson to be learned here in taking your medicine early when you're playing a defense of Bama's quality. Look at how Tennessee beat them: very very similar game flow, but Tennessee kicked 4 field goals in the 1st half and were then able to blow it open in the 2nd half because Heupel stayed patient in the 1st half.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 11:15 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:18 am to iamandykeim
the issue was redzone playcalling and execution.
even with the few defensive busts, if LSU gets points on their statistical production, that was an easy win
even with the few defensive busts, if LSU gets points on their statistical production, that was an easy win
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:18 am to iamandykeim
There was no reason to be that aggressive that early. Lane gave more ammo to those who already say he's a tard.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:18 am to iamandykeim
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 11:19 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:21 am to iamandykeim
quote:
3. 2nd & 19 at Bama 36 - Interception
The offense is once again driving, but Bama makes a big play and gets a sack. 30 seconds left in the 2nd quarter. Instead of accepting that it might be time to hit something underneath and work for a makeable field goal, we call a play to push it down the field, and Leavitt gets baited into an interception. Yes, Leavitt needs to do a better job of seeing the dropping linebacker, but Alabama was also willing to give us an underneath play to get in position for 3 points, and we opted for aggressive playcalling anyway.
The interception was 100% Leavitt. Take what's there, and get at least half of the 19 back. The play design (as it usually would be) was to give him options. He picked the absolute wrong one on his own.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:23 am to iamandykeim
Good post. We blew it. Had opportunities and you can't make me believe Bama is better.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:23 am to iamandykeim
It had the look of a compulsive gambler that kept doubling down after losing. Making riskier and riskier gambles as they dug themself into a hole.
I think Lane playing it conservative at the end of the Kentucky game has been eating at him for weeks. It was in his head during the game and he made a way over adjustment in how he made decisions.
I think Lane playing it conservative at the end of the Kentucky game has been eating at him for weeks. It was in his head during the game and he made a way over adjustment in how he made decisions.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:27 am to iamandykeim
quote:
2. 4th & 4 attempt from the 9
Down 10-3, offense is moving it well but has now stalled a few times. 3.5 minutes left in the 1st half, and we're getting the ball first in the 3rd quarter. Take your points and stay in the fight. 4th & 4 does not have a high enough probability of conversion when there's still 34 minutes left in the game.
This one was the one that annoyed me, still early in the game. Take the damn points. If it was like 4th and 1 okay I can see it, but 4th and 4 is no gimme at all.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:28 am to Jwho77
quote:You're not wrong here, but the coaches have the ability to call plays (like a draw or screen) that can take risk out of the equation. We don't have Joe Burrow back there who we can trust to make perfect decisions all day. You have to coach the players you have, and the coaches are aware that Leavitt can make bad reads from time to time. Call a play that doesn't put all the pressure on him. 47 pass attempts - we asked Leavitt to do a TON.
The interception was 100% Leavitt. Take what's there, and get at least half of the 19 back. The play design (as it usually would be) was to give him options. He picked the absolute wrong one on his own.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:29 am to iamandykeim
quote:
2. 4th & 4 attempt from the 9 Down 10-3, offense is moving it well but has now stalled a few times. 3.5 minutes left in the 1st half, and we're getting the ball first in the 3rd quarter. Take your points and stay in the fight. 4th & 4 does not have a high enough probability of conversion when there's still 34 minutes left in the game.
I’ve got no issue with being aggressive here.
You had Bama pinned back deep if you failed to convert and still maintained high probability of getting a stop with chance to still go 2 for 1. The alternative was taking 3 points, kicking off, and giving Bama better field position for a chance to drive and get points at the end of half.
Defense got the stop and then Sam Leavitt proceeded to Sam Leavitt.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:59 am to iamandykeim
While watching the game, I couldn't help think what Kirby would do if in the same situation. The answer is he would have taken the field goals, won 23-16 or similar and moved on to next week.
Deboer gameplan was to use Lane and Leavitt's impetuousness against them and it worked like a charm.
Deboer gameplan was to use Lane and Leavitt's impetuousness against them and it worked like a charm.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 12:23 pm to iamandykeim
In my opinion, a lot of this (Redzone issues, Redzone play calling, not being patient) directly relates to our inability to run the ball when it matters. The offensive line has not done any good job of getting tough yards for us in the three games that we lost. Guard center guard cannot get push when it matters.

Popular
Back to top
10













