- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lacy lawyer interview
Posted on 4/17/25 at 11:33 am to Red Stick Tigress
Posted on 4/17/25 at 11:33 am to Red Stick Tigress
whatever
This post was edited on 4/17/25 at 11:35 am
0
Posted on 4/17/25 at 11:38 am to Red Stick Tigress
You have no clue how biased or credible this dude is. The gotcha you've pointed out is based on his intuition. And for someone so concerned about facts, you dont seem to give a shite about the facts being reported by two separate police departments.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 11:45 am to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
I hope this police intervention wannabe didn't push him to unalive (sic) himself but it might have.
You are completely unhinged, holy shite
Posted on 4/17/25 at 11:48 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Her and Sammy are bending themselves into pretzels trying to come up with "magic bullet theories" to explain away all of this behavior or blame shift without Lacy taking any accountability whatsoever.
Have they played the race card yet?
Posted on 4/17/25 at 11:56 am to SammyTiger
quote:
So blame first falls on the car that crossed the centerline and hit the other vehicle.
There is absolutely zero way you can say this for sure unless you were there and saw the incident. People have told you this countless times already but for some reason, you just can’t seem to grasp that concept
Posted on 4/17/25 at 12:00 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Again, he didn’t hit anyone.
So blame first falls on the car that crossed the centerline and hit the other vehicle.
god damn. how many times are you going to repeat the same wrong, ignorant stuff? This shite is just obviously, demonstrably, and easily proven to be not true.
quote:
The fact that a motorist didn’t crash into you doesn’t mean they didn’t cause the accident. For example, a driver could cut you off, forcing you to take defensive action. Consequently, you could end up in a ditch trying to avoid a collision. But the driver who cut you off is the cause.
LINK
quote:
If another car causes you to crash, they may be liable for your damages even if their vehicle didn’t collide with yours.
LINK
quote:LINK
In a multi-car accident, the driver who initiated the chain of events that led to the pile-up is typically considered responsible.
quote:LINK
The driver who caused the first crash is usually held liable for the chain-reaction or pileup. This means that the initial driver would be responsible for the entire series of collisions... One driver was excessively speeding, making them unable to stop in time to avoid further pileup.
These are only a few examples of when someone other than the initial driver is at fault for a chain-reaction accident.
Just for the board's reference... I know you wont stop trolling no matter what anyone says. My goal here is to make sure no one else unintentionally falls for your ignorant BS.
This post was edited on 4/17/25 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 4/17/25 at 12:01 pm to TheRouxGuru
its been heavily implied.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 12:19 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:
There is absolutely zero way you can say this for sure unless you were there and saw the incident. People have told you this countless times already but for some reason, you just can’t seem to grasp that concept
1. The general rule is if 2 car collide one of them is at fault. I discussed in the same post what kind of defense can be brought up to ship blame onto a 3rd vehicle.
2. It’s an undisputed fact that she swerved into the other lane and hit the victims car.
3. The other factors I am looking at: Did Lacey hit any other vehicle? Were there other vehicle in the road who avoid lacey and didn’t swerve into oncoming traffic.
Another good rule of thump is if the car in front of you can avoid the obstruction in front of you, you can too. if you are paying attention and following at a safe distance.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 12:26 pm to Vacherie Saint
You posted several links for law firms outside of Louisiana.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 12:29 pm to Le Tenia
quote:
Geez. DIm dackin'
quote:
Toughin' the fk up, suga!!
Are you retarded?
Posted on 4/17/25 at 12:31 pm to Vacherie Saint
He was simply a young man who had maturity issues. The more I think about it all the more he reminded me of Dez Bryant early on in his career.
Dez was very immature and would do stupid stuff all the time.
Dez was very immature and would do stupid stuff all the time.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 12:32 pm to denvertiger
This is the rant, he might be.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 12:33 pm to denvertiger
Can anyone confirm the exact highway and mile marker that this happened at?
Posted on 4/17/25 at 12:36 pm to Vacherie Saint
this isn’t trolling it how the law works.
And I have said MANY times it can be another vehicles fault, but it has to be a sudden emergency
the fact that other people avoided that vehicle,’including the car in front of her hurts that argument.
clearly lacy was not that close or else he would have hit someone.
you keep saying the SB lane was blocked by the victim and the Nb lane was blocked by the truck… so where did Lacey go?
If he had time to merge in front of the victim, that means he was back in his lane before the woman swerved into the victim.
If he was behind the victim, and then he had time to slow down or stop and avoid hitting the 2 cars that were in an accident and a truck.
Which mean he had to be a good distance away if he was going fast.
and let’s look at your quotes:
This isn’t a multi car pile up. thisnis 2 vehicles hitting eachother.
This is not a pile up. it’s 2 cars hitting eachother. there is no second crash as far as I know.
This is the kind of accident they’re talking about:
if you are sitting a a light and the car behind you hits you so hard you get pushed into the car in front of you.
And I have said MANY times it can be another vehicles fault, but it has to be a sudden emergency
the fact that other people avoided that vehicle,’including the car in front of her hurts that argument.
clearly lacy was not that close or else he would have hit someone.
you keep saying the SB lane was blocked by the victim and the Nb lane was blocked by the truck… so where did Lacey go?
If he had time to merge in front of the victim, that means he was back in his lane before the woman swerved into the victim.
If he was behind the victim, and then he had time to slow down or stop and avoid hitting the 2 cars that were in an accident and a truck.
Which mean he had to be a good distance away if he was going fast.
and let’s look at your quotes:
quote:
In a multi-car accident, the driver who initiated the chain of events that led to the pile-up is typically considered responsible.
This isn’t a multi car pile up. thisnis 2 vehicles hitting eachother.
quote:
The driver who caused the first crash is usually held liable for the chain-reaction or pileup.
This is not a pile up. it’s 2 cars hitting eachother. there is no second crash as far as I know.
This is the kind of accident they’re talking about:
quote:
A chain-reaction accident involves multiple cars striking each other. These accidents may end up in a pileup accident as well. In most accidents of this type, Driver A, who caused the initial accident, collides with Driver B, the first person hit, and Driver B is shoved into Driver C. Drivers A and B will usually sustain the most severe injuries.
if you are sitting a a light and the car behind you hits you so hard you get pushed into the car in front of you.
This post was edited on 4/17/25 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 4/17/25 at 12:39 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
i’ve said it before, the Woman crossed the centerline and hit an oncoming car head on.
That’s clearly illegal we can all agree with that.
The standard to pass the blame onto another car is high. Basically is has to be either hitting Lacy head on or the other vehicle head on.
And there is no scenario where that was the case.
This is retarded. #1, a legal finding of guilt or non-guilt doesn’t necessarily align with the real world.
It’s very possible that Lacy caused the accident, and this the death, but wouldn’t have been found guilty.
But those are two different things.
Posted on 4/17/25 at 2:16 pm to denvertiger
I knew that would trigger at least one Dim. 
Am I a retard? No, I'm clearly not a Dim, unhinged and def not soft. I'm offended that you called me retarded and not by pronouns.
Look, I'm not the one that continues to melt and using words such as "public lynching" and "police wannabes" projecting unnecessary blame.
Let me guess, you also believe that mean people, the lack of support and the police are the reason he did what all that he did? Has CTE been blamed yet? BK will prob be next up.
Thanks for noticing though!
quote:
Are you retarded?
Am I a retard? No, I'm clearly not a Dim, unhinged and def not soft. I'm offended that you called me retarded and not by pronouns.
Look, I'm not the one that continues to melt and using words such as "public lynching" and "police wannabes" projecting unnecessary blame.
Let me guess, you also believe that mean people, the lack of support and the police are the reason he did what all that he did? Has CTE been blamed yet? BK will prob be next up.
Thanks for noticing though!
Posted on 4/17/25 at 2:42 pm to Zach Lee To Amp Hill
Hard truth is that this is a tragedy! And we may never know to what extent any of it could have been avoided. I don't necessarily agree with assumptions that Lacy was responsible for the first accident that killed the gentleman. Too many holes in the testimonies so far for me. But the actions after the fact of altercations with family, an apparent police chase, and sudden self-inflicted gunshot would that lead directly to Lacy's death are all actions that HE did with purpose. For those I can insert my opinion that they were all about Lacy and his mindset and how well or poorly he handled his emotions. My prayers to all involved here as well as the Tiger Nation who knew him up close and for those who admired his play on the field from afar.
RIP and Geaux Tigers!!
RIP and Geaux Tigers!!
Posted on 4/17/25 at 3:33 pm to Zach Lee To Amp Hill
I'm pretty sure you would also go crazy knowing your about go to court for something you didn't do!! The DA was just trying to make a name for his self. Firing a gun into the ground isn't even a crime in some towns Shooting a finger gun is such a crime. Gtf out of here bro if it wasn't for the media and a pos DA he would hear his name called next week. If it went to trail he beat it 100/100 times. I know someone who works for the assistant DA and others wanted the charges dropped because they don't have enough evidence to win the case. People amaze me when they gives their opinion and they only know what the media has released. Everything I've said isn't my opinion its a fact. Not 99% a fact but 100% a fact
Posted on 4/17/25 at 5:38 pm to Le Tenia
quote:
police wannabes
quote:
public lynching
If you think you're trying to quote me, at least do it accurately.
I'm not having a meltdown. I think KL was deep into social media amd it had a bad effect on him mentally. They went to every single story about him and called him a murderer, thug, etc. Even people on here said these type of things as well as on his and his dad's Facebook pages and that is mob mentality. Guilty until proven innocent. It wasn't just white people as some have said.
He obviously couldn't handle the pressure cooker in his head.
This post was edited on 4/17/25 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 4/17/25 at 6:15 pm to Ironeagle5879
quote:
His lawyer seemed quite confident it would go away, and after hearing the Brister case I would agree with him.
Ive watched (from the jury box) this lawyer argue a case for a defendant who had ZERO, and I mean ZERO case. I found his demeanor, and the conviction in which he pleaded his case, to be highly impressive. Just sayin. I'd hire him in a heartbeat if needed.
And btw... I hope you're right that Lacy's name gets fully cleared.
Page 13 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News